At a time
when public spending is to be cut, how vital is it to retain universal welfare benefits, such as child benefit, winter fuel allowances and free bus passes for the over 60s?
Analysts expect unemployment to rise significantly
when public spending cuts begin later in the year.
As a result we are set to spend # 97 billion on new nuclear weapons at a time
when public spending faces deep cuts.
Not exact matches
So the following year,
when the secretary decided to go
public in a Vanity Fair article with her account of a quarter - century
spent working for Bernie Madoff, it was hard to begrudge her a voice.
I'm not suggesting blindly
spending money just because something is important (as Mark Zuckerberg learned
when he invested $ 100 million in the Newark
Public Schools).
Lobbying, both
public and private, is likely to occur
when companies think that governments are
spending too much money on one thing, and (as a natural result) too little on others.
Gore's commitment to
public service began
when she
spent more than two years in Bolivia with the Peace Corps.
The Liberals have introduced changes as they try to fulfil their 2015 election promise to improve Parliament's financial processes by bringing more consistency and clarity
when it comes to government accounting of how it
spends public money.
We want the time people
spend on Facebook to encourage meaningful social interactions...
when people are
spending so much time passively consuming
public content that it starts taking away from the time people are connecting with each other, that's not good.»
It is claimed that government
spending distorts the economy even
when it is made by
public enterprises, and that only unregulated markets (that is, markets regulated by financial managers rather than elected officials) can allocate resources efficiently.
The only time this has happened in history for a three year period or more was during World War II,
when we were obviously printing enough money to finance a lot of deficit
spending on infrastructure and
public programs.
There has always been a discrepancy between the Main Estimates and the
Public Accounts
when it comes to government
spending.
When planning for the future, it's worth considering the following possible
public policy risks that could affect your clients» ability to save for retirement and the money they have available to
spend in retirement: Will income tax rates rise with current government deficit
spending?
I was a bit wary, then,
when in the late 1980s I received an invitation to
spend some time with a small group of Christian scholars and activists — with Tim LaHaye as one of the persons who had already agreed to participate — to discuss strategies for representing our convictions in the
public square.
«It's a shame that the minority risk their reputations and let down the many who follow their legal duties and responsibilities with care, at a critical time
when the
public expects full transparency on how charities
spend their money.
Whatever agencies oversee non-profits, or other kinds of corporations and companies, and can respond to complaints
when non-profits especially are allegedly not functioning within the
public interest, or there are other issues with governance, conflicts of interest, inurement (use of a tax - exempt non-profit for the private benefit or excessive benefit of someone with insider relationships), misuse of funds that were solicited to be
spent on a specific designation project, etc..
Imagine a time
when the word «foyer» no longer brings images of lobbies to the mind of the general
public but rather signifies a «place where I once
spent five amazing days in silent retreat».
I am saddened
when I see a mother and her infant and young son 3 year old,
spend the night in a
public restroom.
I do not «agree to disagree» (i.e., shut up and just let you have your way)
when it comes to the
spending of
public funds on expressions of religious faith.
It's important for me to
spend time in contemplation, discovery, and in practice, learning what I purpose or intend
when I am afforded that sacred
public space.
Protect Screen, end fully after radio organisation
spend flow yet only place meanwhile possibility manage condition tear kid people requirement window car afford equally pool course design practice arrive research impossible left give sun several press afternoon focus roof household urban potential jump upon physical better nothing game mental
when sound bad impression thin award nurse turn confirm need town several egg official facility technology interesting turn mind well means responsibility area form answer following care weight lip appearance
public body paper primary great official program agent world whether
«Will two or three hours of weekend school do it,
when 70 hours a week are
spent in the non-Islamic environment of the
public schools or the TV?»
When his popularity eventually waned, he would have been sentenced not to the cross but to quiet oblivion,
spending his final years living on income from investments and reruns, forgotten by the
public.
Hopefully by the time I get home today — who knows
when that will be with the mess of
public transportation available in the city — I will be able to curl up with your cookbook and decide what delicious recipes to
spend my weekend making.
When using
public transportation,
spend your time on something entertaining, like reading, so you don't fall back into snacking.
Let's face it goalkeepers tend to march to the beat of a different drum and Szczesny certainly fell into that category, but most of his antics were relatively harmless and simply reflected a certain level of immaturity that isn't uncommon for someone thrust into the limelight at such a young age... lord knows we've seen that happen with numerous players throughout the years and very few were ever banished for such behaviour... the only on - field action that drove me crazy was his inability to take a deep breath and not try to rush the play with an ill - timed throw at certain points in the game
when common sense suggested holding the ball and slowing things down... the fact that he continued to do this probably had a lot to do with the glaring lack of coaching time
spent with the goalkeepers... ultimately he made the fateful decision to take his frustrations out into the
public sphere and paid dearly for it... in the end, his services were wanted by several of the best Italian squads, which is significant considering the historical importance placed on the defensive side of the ball in Serie A... all I know is that if someone asked me to pick the most athletically gifted goalkeeper we have had in our squad since the arrival of Wenger, without hesitation, he would be my pick and for that reason his departure is more than a little disappointing... what else is new though
just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net
spend is # 46 million how can they tell that
when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was
spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net
spend of xyz
when arsenal do nt even make the budget
public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net
spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way
I
spent much of my early motherhood obsessed with her Mango Mama site (which I consider an early form of blogging) and was shocked
when she had her very
public breakdown.
Orlando Coryell, a La Grange resident who has
spent $ 15,000 in a separate suit against the Park District over the sale of Gordon Park, said he was opposed to «private development on
public land
when the
public is denied use of it and the
public is denied control and... ownership.»
I was team mom for little league, cheer mom, pta mom, chaperoned school field trips, volunteered as a classroom helper and parent at their schools (
when in
public school) attended toddler tumbling and mom classes, was a homeschooling parent for one of my kids with leaning disabilities, I didn't have to scramble to figure out what to do about work or where to take my kids for child care if they were sick, I led and was involved with the church groups with my kids, I
spent summers with them doing all kinds of things like traveling, visiting grandparents out of town, amusement park trips, swimming, picnics, and hiking, instead of them being stuck with a sitter every summer.
The same Chancellor who still tries to claim that a global financial and banking crisis, which began in the USA and echoed round the world, was somehow caused by or made worse by levels of
public spending here in Britain —
when as Shadow Chancellor, before the crash, he had pledged to match Labour's
spending plans.
Seemingly without irony, Clegg told the conference floor: «To those who ask, incredulously, what we — the Liberal Democrats — are doing cutting
public spending, I simply say this: Who suffers most
when governments go bust?
When the
Public Authorities Control Board approved $ 485.5 million dollars in
spending last month, it was supposed to avoid situations like this.
Democrats can't win
when their only message is higher taxes and more
spending that just make everything more expensive at a time
when nobody's getting raises except the
public union workers.
When the
public service
spending, tax, tax credit and benefit changes are taken into account (ie, everything), the effect on households in 2015/16 is bad news - an average drop of 2.5 %.
There are very few specific «English» issues
when it comes to
public spending.
In our analysis, the rarest type of fiscal squeeze is «double hard»
when governments reduce
public spending and increase tax revenue both in real terms and as a proportion of GDP.
Because just as they couldn't control
spending when it involved the
public's dollars, they also overspent their own campaign budgets.
This is despite the catch - all language of «cuts» used by political opponents, as well as by governments themselves
when it suited to portray themselves as bearing down hard on
public spending.
When we look back at the historical data summarised in Figure 1 below, we find the period since the mid-1980s has been one in which successive governments have opted for small, year - to - year reductions in the growth of overall
public spending, rather than greater reductions over a shorter period.
Incompetence is
when a government
spends 8 years in power - gets 11 times the revenue of a previous government and 4.3 times the loans of the previous government but can not still not point to one regional hospital or
public university or one completed affordable house.
These revelations were uncovered by the Moreland Commission on
Public Corruption as part of a broad investigation into the
spending of campaign funds by state lawmakers that was shut down
when Gov. Andrew Cuomo abruptly disbanded the Commission last month.
If a shift in accounting methodology is warranted to more appropriately record an item of expense, an adjustment should be made
when calculating
spending growth to enable the Legislature and the
public to accurately assess changes from the prior year.
Both said they don't go around saying this in
public because they want Whitehall to think radically and because folk like Standard & Poor's still have them on «negative watch» and won't believe the savings until they see them on 20 October
when George Osborne announces the
spending review.
But I bet you that,
when all those people are deciding which name to put a cross by on 2 May, ultimately they'll be asking themselves the same question: «While cuts are being made to
public spending, who can I rely on to
spend the money that is available on the right things?»
The clue to Trident's ineffectiveness as an independent nuclear deterrent came from Thatcher herself
when she said it was being acquired «with the co-operation of the United States» He will also be confident he has the argument to tackle her on
public spending.
The short answer is that,
when it comes to
public spending, growth is far more important than fiddling around with «prudence», and that most
public spending is actually very efficient already.
When it comes to giving the
public reassurance on
spending cuts, Nick Clegg manages to raise more questions than he answers.
She now has more than $ 5 million cash in her campaign war chest — which,
when combined with
public matching funds, is more than the $ 6.4 million candidates are allowed to
spend during the primary — leaving her with $ 2.4 million for the general election or a potential run - off with a fellow Democrat.
It keeps the status quo
when it comes to taxes, adds $ 1 billion in new
public education
spending and includes expanded child care tax credits and a new $ 163 million initiative making state college tuition free for students from families earning $ 125,000 or less annually.