Analysts expect unemployment to rise significantly
when public spending cuts begin later in the year.
Not exact matches
Seemingly without irony, Clegg told the conference floor: «To those who ask, incredulously, what we — the Liberal Democrats — are doing
cutting public spending, I simply say this: Who suffers most
when governments go bust?
This is despite the catch - all language of «
cuts» used by political opponents, as well as by governments themselves
when it suited to portray themselves as bearing down hard on
public spending.
But I bet you that,
when all those people are deciding which name to put a cross by on 2 May, ultimately they'll be asking themselves the same question: «While
cuts are being made to
public spending, who can I rely on to
spend the money that is available on the right things?»
As a result we are set to
spend # 97 billion on new nuclear weapons at a time
when public spending faces deep
cuts.
When it comes to giving the
public reassurance on
spending cuts, Nick Clegg manages to raise more questions than he answers.
When the Labour governments elected in those years squandered their political support by wave after wave of pay restraint and finally IMF - inspired
cuts in
public spending, Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979 and made a last ditch attempt to stem the Tory decline.
In 2001
when a shadow Treasury minister he had to go into hiding during that year's election campaign after claiming the Tories wanted to
cut public spending by # 20 billion rather than the # 8 billion they had publicly stated.
In this climate of austerity and the need for
public sector
cuts,
when so many are worried about the possibility that nurses, teachers and other such essential workers will be forced out of work as government tightens its belt, it is worth noting that # 2.8 billion of taxpayers» money was
spent on consultancy fees in 2005 - 06 alone.
The
public spending cuts will wound a sector bolstered by injections of funding under Labour from the mid-90s
when money was redirected away from universities to early years learning and further education.
Labour, trade unions and some economists argue that by drastically
cutting spending in the
public sector the government is preventing demand in the economy, just
when international markets become more and more volatile.
Bloomberg will likely issue a plea for lawmakers to restore some of NYC's $ 300 million in aid to localities Gov. Andrew Cuomo axed in his 2011 - 2012
spending plan and also ask for the repeal of «last in, first out» rule
when it comes to laying off
public school teachers, which he says the governor's
cuts will force him to do if they're allowed to stand.
Have things reached the perverse situation where in order to get elected Labour have to
cut public spending for their first term although they want to increase it and the Conservatives have to increase
public spending in order to get elected, usually
when people vote for a different party it is because they expect something to be different from the way it was, such plans leave it wide open for the Liberal Democrats to come out and propose a series of economy measures and be the one of the 3 parties proposing the lowest levels of
public spending and tax
cuts targeted at the poor.
There are also disagreements on Europe and
when to start
cutting public spending.
«
When to
cut public spending?»
That's
when the voting
public elect Dems to fix the deficit
spending and bring down the debt with the only tool available being raising taxes or
cutting the few services available to the residents.
And
when we're done with these
cuts,
spending on
public services will actually still be at the same level as it was in 2006.
Conservatives should not be pledging to continue the biggest ever peacetime increase in
public spending when ordinary Britons are having to
cut their own budgets.
This, The Sunday Times tells us, «is higher than the 49.7 % peak reached
when Denis Healey had to turn to the IMF for help in 1976, and underlines the scale of the crisis in the
public finances and the even deeper
cuts in
spending that will be needed after the election.»
In his budget last month, Chancellor George Osborne said departments would face average
cuts of 25 %
when the government's
public spending review is completed in October - potentially bigger than anything attempted by a previous UK government.
Blame William Hague for his spineless comments
when British jobs were on the line at the Total oil refinery, blame David Cameron for not saying he'd abandon the Lisbon Treaty, and blame George Osborne for talking about
public spending cuts at a time
when only
public sector workers are working.
What the government has promised to do is
cut the nation's structural deficit - the
public sector
spending deficit that exists even
when the economy is operating at its full potential.
At a time
when public spending is to be
cut, how vital is it to retain universal welfare benefits, such as child benefit, winter fuel allowances and free bus passes for the over 60s?
At a time
when the
public are warming towards
spending increases - DC lauds the fact he has asked every shadow minister to find
cuts!
«We became interested in studying the effects of economic downturns on
public spending during the Great Recession of the late 2000s,
when media outlets were filled with stories about states
cutting optional Medicaid benefits, increasing school class sizes and reducing course offerings,» said Ho, who is also a professor of economics at Rice and a professor of medicine at Baylor College of Medicine.
At a time
when pressure on school places and buildings is increasing, and the
public sector is being asked to make more
cuts on
spending, it is critical that school providers understand current issues on planning if they are to make best use of their built assets, according to Karen Cooksley and Lindsay Garratt from law firm Winckworth Sherwood
When it comes to traditional
public schools, more than three out of every four parents surveyed said they were opposed to reducing compensation for teachers or
cutting resources for the classroom while increasing
spending on charter schools.
It argues that by improving their finances
when economic performance is strong, governments will have more scope to use tax
cuts or increases in
public spending to combat a future downturn.