Sentences with phrase «when religious people»

Kind of like when religious people claim attacking LGBT people is for «family values» — the definitions of these slogans always leaves much to be desired.

When religious people will vote lock step with a candidate that spits on the first amendment and can not keep his religion out of his politics, then there is just cause to oppose Romney and all who support him.

Always find it funny when religious people write «uniting» articles like this which only service to isolate the non-religious from mainstream, believing society.

I also have a problem when religious people disregard science and fact for blind faith and the so - called «inspired word of god.»

It offends me when religious people try to «save» me based on their determination of why they think I need to be «saved», but I think I find it even more offensive that any myth, fairy tale, delusion, or what - have - you can be completely accepted in this society, but the ones who are considered «off» are the ones like me who find religious beliefs absurd.

@CJ: I'd chill out if I could, but I think it's a huge issue when religious people foist their beliefs on impressionable little kids.

I do care, however, when religious people try to interfere with secular laws and education.

I consider it mixed up when the religious people have the power and the rational thinking are thought of as the crazies

When religious people stop attempting to codify their religious beliefs into our laws just because they are the majority and think they have some kind of divine right to do so, then they wouldn't need to be bad mouthed.

Let me tell ya, for every one argument or «crying» as you put it, there are 1000 times when religious people cry about this or that.

I don't appreciate it when religious people do it to me.

But when religious people attempt to codify nonsense into law or otherwise force their religion on others, then blowback is entirely to be expected.

Yes, they will argue if given the opportunity, but the only time you see them become agitated is when religious people try to impose their beliefs on them via public works: government, schools, etc..

this world is not very pleasant sometimes, especially when religious people try to tell me what to do.

I can only say that I do this when religious people use the «bible» as a historical text.

It's always amusing when a religious person has to fall back on insults because he can't muster up an intelligent defense of his beliefs.

All three are at work when religious persons consecrate their lives to the care of leprosy or other peculiarly unpleasant diseases.

Not exact matches

To put things in context, Bell followed that quote up by expressing his disappointment when communities of faith discourage people from asking questions about religious texts or beliefs.

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi championed this notion when he realized that this experience was felt and described in a similar manner no matter the person — religious mystics, scientists, artists, and ordinary working people describing their most rewarding work experiences.

«The idea of getting to hang out with [Wild Turkey's] Jimmy Russell — when you look at people's faces, it's like a religious experience,» Gregory says.

Religious people have no business being alive when they are that stupid.

There is nothing at all beyond that, but when people get all their science information from religious websites it shows in their ignorance.

Not a religious perosn just hate when people intentionally misconstrue data.

I just don't like it when people cherry pick their religious sources or, in the case of this article, outright go against what their religious texts teach to try and appear more politically correct.

I think we let the terrorists win when we become less American and violate our own constitution by messing around in people's religious affairs.

The more educated one becomes the less religious one is... when you see educated politicians and professional people of all kinds talking religiousness it's lip service for the ignorant... it's part of their job... other wise there's trouble from the little people.

It is not fair to simply group all believers of a religious into disillusioned when many people say they live their lives only through faith.

When atheists begin a debate with a religious person, it's because the atheists are bullies who have no respect for the beliefs of others.

I absolutely hate that the backwards overly religious people in our country need to quote the bible when common sense should be justification enough.

I'm always interested in how Huston Smith (Methodist Minister / world renowned religious historian) answers people when they ask if he believes in God.

And when they ask questions you can not answer because you do not know, just revert to the religious person's favorite default, «It is part of god's plan.

Why blame the religious people when they're just using the system the way it was meant to be used?

When people come to share a plane or public place they should try to be a human being first, instead of a show case religious person.

If you don't get that, if you can't overlook your personal religious beliefs when someone is before you dying, then you are doing a grave disservice not only to those people but to your beliefs.

WRONG... I like this USUALLY WORD... it's so religious in the since that you can PICK AND CHOOSE when, whether and what god is saying to you... people that hear god knows it's GOD... HOW?

This is exactly why religious people are having difficulties coming to terms that there is no God — they construct an «evidence» for God because they simply desire to do so; they do so when it is not supported by logic and / or despite logic.

When we see religious communities spending most of their time trying to convince people not to sin, we are seeing a community that has missed the point.

Community of the kind Christ desires can only occur with another when He is shared as more necessary than breath amidst all persons present, whether they be the person «giving» or the one receiving — Christ must not be fore - fitted to some other monstrous conceit that is paraded as «communion» and «fellowship» — the common bane of our religious activity.

Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...

It should actually scare the hell out of people when someone running for office declares deep religious motivation.

I don't feel the need to cater to the religiously naive and uneducated by acting like there's a difference especially when these same religious folk would surely deem a person of an opposing religion / view that heard voices crazy.

Well I sometimes use the Christian label so as not to be oppressed by people like you — for example, when filling out religious preferences for organizations like the Boy Scouts.

Now in Africa, most people are rural, religious, and fairly conservative when it comes to sexual behavior, despite lurid stereotypes of oversexed African men forcing themselves on women and girls without a thought.

When you ask a religious person «Why?»

When comments treating religious people as morons are posted, that makes atheists look just as asinine as the far right religious nut jobs that most here rail against.

On top of that the Byzantine empire was occupying the Egyptians and persecuted its people, when Muslims beat Byzantium they granted religious freedom to the Christians of Alexandria.

It's to the point with some Christian posters here that any criticism of their actions and religious beliefs garners the immediate judgment that the person doing so is being hateful when, in reality, they are only fulfilling that very same Bible observation made by Jesus.

When I say blindly it is because I know many, many, many religious people that believe what they believe because someone told them to, not because they have studied the material and come to their own conclusions as you have.

The real question is «When does a religious person stop being an ideologically - blinded drag and start to become a human being?»

Then I understood religion and atheism are alike because religious people when they can't answer something they say it's God's wishes and they followers accept it.