Sentences with phrase «when robots»

Of course, Atlas isn't perfect, and Boston Dynamics knows the audience loves it when robots fail.
If and when robots become ethical actors that can be held responsible for their actions, we can then begin debating whether they are no longer machines and are deserving of some form of personhood.
In one instance of robotic guidance by machine vision, robots in the assembly line are given feedback when the robots install components into the mainframe of the automobile.
Will there ever come a day when robots will replace lawyers?
She asks if a «feminist exit movement» can be established, wondering who will pick up the pieces when the robots leave and there is nowhere left to go?
When the robots turned into balls, that was like Indiana Jones.
When robots and tentacles and cars pop out of the screen, you really get an appreciation for the visual effects.
And what measure of upheaval will be triggered when the robots go haywire?
Sending humans is much more expensive than sending people, and on a scout mission why potentially send humans to their deaths when the robots could do just as good a job?
Until now, they have always had to step in when the robots need to cross a road.
Like in many of the other films on the list, this directive is taken to the extreme when the robots decide that humanity is a danger to itself and must be pacified.
The lessons learned, she hopes, will hasten the day when robots can collaborate with people in space exploration, deep - sea research, and search - and - rescue efforts.
When the robots return to the surface and are recovered, UH Mānoa researchers will extract DNA from the filters.
When robots fight in place of soldiers, will wars have fewer casualties?
But when these robots are done mixing it up, they snap together and fold their way down to smaller sizes and more manageable weights.
New applications will expand the market and spur further advances when robots fall short in acuity, precision, strength, reach, dexterity, skill or processing power.
When robots fight in place of soldiers, will wars have fewer civilian casualties?
Sure it could have a lot of uses, but what about when the robots decide to conquer us?
I agree that universal basic income would be logical when robots make everything and everything is basically free.
When robots take over many humans» jobs, what will people do for a living?
In retrospect, the new Tesla seems rather pedestrian coming from a man who muses about flying cars and the day when robots replace humans, but at least he possesses a superhuman ability to generate publicity.
It's better when robots take over mundane tasks or drive cars for us so we can be more productive at other tasks.
The recipient receives a text notification when the robot arrives, which contains a link that will unlock it.
When a robot has to actually take some action, it's limited to the number of sets of actions it can take in a given day.
When the robot is carrying a tray, you can place any object and let the humanoid robot take the item where ever you want him to bring it to.
Feedback from force sensors also helped: When the robot needed to insert a pin into a hole, for example, it would slide the pin over the surface until it felt a change in force.
But when their robot got stuck — because a necessary part was missing, say — the machines were unable to explain the specifics of what was needed, and instead could only ask for generalised «help».
Or they might slap a small patterned decal on the satellite, so that when the robot sidles up, it can tell instantly if everything's lining up properly.
That way, when a robot goes to push it back, it's a simple peel job, it's not a cut — and you can reattach it afterward.»
Nobody cares if you have a stinging pain when a robot hits you — what you want to prevent is injury, because that's when litigation starts.»
But when the robot lifted its tail after it left the ramp — just enough to make up for the vehicle's forward pitch — it landed even more gracefully than the lizards.
But when the robot got inside, «we faced a challenge that we had not seen before,» Choset recalls.
So when the robot senses a change in the pattern of the field the algorithm automatically adjusts its path of to dodge the obstacle.
Improvements in a legged robot's agility could only come when the robot could operate each leg independently without sacrificing the machine's stability.
«But as soon as the competition started, I knew exactly what to do and when our robot hung, I was so happy.»
Their robot, called CHIMP, has legs that can fold up and double as treads when the robot needs to traverse rough terrain.
They showed that when a robot was able to infer both the task and the specificity of the instructions, it responded to commands in one second 90 percent of the time.
(The good news: It's only near the entrance to the basement stairs that you have to watch your back when your robot is around.)
When the robot was held still in the tank, the live fish showed high group cohesion, along with a strong polarization — meaning the fish were likely to be close to each other and oriented in the same direction.
In addition, a controller could send commands to the humanoid, prompting it to wave, dance, sit, stand, etcetera (although there was a lag time between the prompt and when the robot made the movement).
A handheld controller, which lets soldiers remotely send Dragon Runner out as an advance scout, vibrates when the robot's motion or audio sensors are triggered.
Lastly, the study participants preferred smooth, familiar movements — which resemble human movements — rather than sharp («robotic») or unfamiliar movements when the robot was leading the interaction.
When the robot is not given the location for the objects in the scene and needs to learn vision and control together, the learning process takes about three hours.
«The key is that when a robot is faced with something new, we won't have to reprogram it.
When the robot is under the control of Goddard, there is a lag of 2.5 seconds each way in communicating with the robot, similar to the delay in operating a robot on the Moon from the Earth.
Furthermore, post-hoc comparisons revealed that fish spent significantly more time in the vicinity of the bioinspired robotic fish as its tail - beat frequency was set to 3 Hz (185.8 s) as compared to the case when the robot tail - beat frequency was 0 Hz or 2 Hz (121.3 s or 132.7 s, respectively).
Experimental results show that the time spent by golden shiners in the vicinity of the bioinspired robotic fish is the highest when the robot mimics their natural color pattern and beats its tail at the same frequency.
The time spent by fish in the middle compartment (49.2 s) was the highest when the robot tail - beat frequency was set at 2 Hz and post-hoc comparisons revealed that such time was significantly different than the time spent in the middle compartment for the robot beating its tail at 4 Hz (35.2 s), see Figure 7.
The time spent in compartment B3 (28.5 s) was the highest when the robot tail - beat frequency was set to 3 Hz, and post-hoc comparisons revealed that such time was significantly different than the time spent in B3 for the robot beating its tail at 0 Hz or 2 Hz (24.5 s or 24.6 s, respectively), see Figure 7.
When some robot parts he's collected rebuild themselves, the reborn creature sets out on a murder spree.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z