To be fair, it's a lot easier to implement physics and custom animations and dismemberment for hundreds of different objects
when said objects are made up of far fewer polygons, and appear in smaller numbers in smaller spaces.
Not exact matches
The Trump - appointed chairman
says his predecessor, Democrat Tom Wheeler, oversaw negotiations with Verizon and Clyburn didn't
object last year
when she was initially briefed on the settlement.
The challenge,
says Cambridge Consultants» Nathan Wrench, is to overcome the uncertainty
when handling something — which humans deal with unconsciously: figuring out its shape and location and how hard to grip it, and distinguishing one
object from another.
So feel free to
say, «His skills are deficient,»
when an employee is lacking specific skills (because you're focusing on the missing skill and not the employee), but leave defective to discussions of inanimate
objects.
Ideally, Fennell
said, federal regulators would have required not only backup cameras but also emergency braking and alert systems that automatically stop a vehicle
when sensors detect
objects or people in a rear blind spot.
David Zilberg, who
objects to NTN's executive compensation levels
when the stock price is down,
said the company got a restraining order against him after he repeatedly contacted management to complain.
I love it
when I am teaching about grace, and someone in the class
objects by
saying, «But if what you are
saying is true, then why can't I just go sin all I want?»
When Laycock suggested something like, «The prayers to the almighty, prayers to the creator,» Alito and others were unconvinced,
saying polytheists might
object.
So
when Whitehead
says it «lies in the nature of things that the many enter into complex unity» (Process 21), he should be referring first of all to (1) transition — the way the incipient whole overlaps the many of the preceding world so they «become»
objects or parts of its process.
In order to interpret this core - principle of revelation, we must understand its essential presupposition; namely, that events are present «in» other events - present not just abstractly (through «eternal
objects»), i.e., mediated by the «general,» but as singular events that effect their further history by their unique concreteness (PR 338).12 Whitehead recognizes precisely this constellation
when he
says:» [T] he truism that we can only conceive in terms of universals has been stretched to mean that we can only feel in terms of universals.
Deleuze (1994) 14 - 15: «
When the consciousness of knowledge or the working thought of memory is missing, the knowledge in itself is only the repetition of the
object it is played, that is to
say repeated, enacted instead of being known... the less one remembers, the less one is conscious of remembering one's past, the more one repeats it.»
Laugh if you want, but I know from personal experience, that this
object is definitely spiritually manipulated, and believe me
when I
say that you WILL get more than you bargained for afterwards.
To recap — you
object when, in your opinion, others twist what the bible
says.
You don't even notice that you are using the old ideas
when you describe the phenomena; for example, you put them into time and space or
say that
objects are solid.
«Newman makes my blood run cold
when in one of the Parochial and Plain Sermons he
says that Heaven is like a church because, in both, «one single sovereign
object — religion — is brought before us.»
And Whitehead
says that he does not think it is inevitable that the human mind spatializes, though it often does this, and
when it does, one way or another, whether through partiality or something else, it deforms the
object of knowledge and of experience... [But] Bergson believed that, at least to some significant degree, the spatializing tendencies of the human intellect and of human intelligence, can be overcome by a biology and a physics that is less mechanistic.
At this point Cobb might be tempted to make one last ditch stand, arguing that I have begged the question by merely assuming that a structured society can not be an enduring
object, whereas what he is
saying,
when he
says that one regional standpoint can include another, is that one enduring entity, one nonspatial, serially ordered society, can still be a structured society in that its temporally successive occasions can include the regional standpoints of the «narrower» actual entities which make up its subordinate societies and / or nexus.
Just as an eternal
object,
say, redness, gives no information about itself save
when it ingresses in or is realized in the red shirt or the red book, so too, a proposition as such «tells no tale about itself» (PR 256f / 391 -3).
Rather, it
says: «But
when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same
Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government and to provide new Guards for their future security.»
Acts 11:4 - 18: «But Peter began speaking and proceeded to explain to them in orderly sequence,
saying, «I WAS IN THE CITY OF JOPPA PRAYING; AND IN A TRANCE I SAW A VISION, an
object coming down like a great sheet lowered by four corners from the sky; and it came right down to me, and
when I had fixed my gaze on it and was observing it I saw the four - footed animals of the earth and the wild beasts and the crawling creatures and the birds of the air.
And
when written,
when in a sense it can become an
object, we know well what Christ
says about it: the letter is dead.
For centuries people believed that Aristotle was right
when he
said that the heavier an
object, the faster it would fall to earth.
We boys of a later day found lost
objects sometimes by catching a daddy long - legs,
saying over him a formula which unfortunately can no longer be recalled,
when the great insect would solemnly point one of his long legs in the supposed direction of the lost
object.
Thus,
when we note that the soul, like the molecule, is an enduring
object, we are
saying something important about the identity that underlies their diversity.
There is much to be
said for this theory of history, though one might
object that the theory weakens
when applied to technologically advanced societies.
I can
say, at least, that
when I have used this illustration, Buddhists have not
objected.
When changing
objects are analyzed philosophically, it can be
said that there are changes in their attributes, but that what underlies the attributes, what the attributes are attributes of, remains strictly the same.
I
say this due the gravimetric nuances of all major celestial
objects though small
when compared to galactic centered black holes yet nevertheless due gravimetric oscillations of black hole designations that dare seemingly to suggest that small to ever smaller black holes may well exist within celestial stars and planets and even moons.
That is to
say, there are times
when a term has precisely the same meaning in two or more discrete instances of its use:
say, «blue» as applied to two different visible
objects situated in the same range of the chromatic spectrum.
When the police arrest the man and ask him why he hit his child a second time, the father
objects,
saying, «I never promised to not hit him with a shovel; I promised to not hit him with a baseball bat.»
DE: This seems to me to be what his philosophy of organism should have gone for, and
when he
said he was trying to make this a bridge notion between the biological and physical sciences, I think the link is in his notion of the «non-uniform
object» of which the simplest example is the wave.
That is to
say, it can be correctly defined as that which,
when made the
object of attentive awareness, yields the values of religious experience.
Esthetic quality is
said to have depth
when the meaning of the perceived
object is not immediately apparent to the unpracticed observer, and
when the
object is capable of yielding a succession of mutually enriching meanings.
Whenever a tree incarnates the World Tree or
when a spade is associated with the phallus and agricultural work with the act of generation, for example, one could
say that the immediate reality of these
objects or actions «bursts» or «explodes» under the irruptive force of a more profound reality.
«We
object to opening up a new trade with China
when there is still so much abuse going on in our existing markets,»
says Katrina Love, the campaign manager for Stop Live Exports, a community action group.
Smith
said that government intervention is sometimes necessary: «especially
when the object is to reduce poverty... When the regulation, therefore, is in support of the workman, it is always just and equitable...&ra
when the
object is to reduce poverty...
When the regulation, therefore, is in support of the workman, it is always just and equitable...&ra
When the regulation, therefore, is in support of the workman, it is always just and equitable...»
Despite being co-opted and misrepresented by apologists for the corporate market system, Smith
said that government intervention is sometimes necessary: «especially
when the object is to reduce poverty... When the regulation, therefore, is in support of the workman, it is always just and equitable; but it is sometimes otherwise when in favour of the masters.&ra
when the
object is to reduce poverty...
When the regulation, therefore, is in support of the workman, it is always just and equitable; but it is sometimes otherwise when in favour of the masters.&ra
When the regulation, therefore, is in support of the workman, it is always just and equitable; but it is sometimes otherwise
when in favour of the masters.&ra
when in favour of the masters.»
You are correct
when you
say it's the content of the posts against Wenger that I
object to, as does Pires and many other so calle AKB»S (stupid abbreviation) But
when Jon, for whatever reason, does not see this and continues to play the almighty I react, sometimes as badly as I think he has done.
San Francisco skipper Dusty Baker doesn't
object to the play, but does
say that he would have been «too proud» to try a similar trick
when he was a player.
But then again money is no
object Wenger
said,
when it comes to buying a player.
When you read to your infant,
say the names of the
objects, people, and animals as you point to them, and make the sounds of the animals and the
objects in the book.
When your baby is alert and active, place an
object on your head, such as a hat or toy, and
say its name aloud.
Well, somewhere between - I'd kind of like to
say - six to eight months, babies develop what we refer to as
object permanence, and they begin to understand that things and people exit
when they're not present.
When your crawling baby or roving toddler heads toward an unacceptable or dangerous play
object, calmly
say «No» and either remove your child from the area or distract him or her with an appropriate activity.
she
said sometimes
when nobody wants to play with her, she will just walk around looking at rocks or any small
objects.
How can you be accused of neglect
when there is no abuse well cps
said we both need to see doctors we both need to see them for a medical physiological evaluation all because we
objected to a false claim from a hospital a hospital that did a forced c section on my wife so that they could receive more money from DSHS The cash machine for the poor who in return take's babies to keep there service going selling babies for 25.000 dollars yes it's a sick system one that «Hitler Would be proud of The SS worker who brought a Sheriff with her all to see yes our child, is safe yes we care for him!
When they get around to talking, though, they'll probably progress quickly and soon be able to point at something familiar and
say its name, and recognize names of familiar people,
objects, and body parts.
My mind blanked
when I was writing my comment but I meant to
say Object Permanence Toys such as the box with ball, or drawer with ball, or push balls.
If your child always
says muh
when he wants milk, it means that he understands this sound stands for a specific
object — that yummy white stuff.
The scientist - authored book Authoritative Parenting, which Sax references in his book, points out that authoritative parents should be willing to negotiate and change their demands
when their children reasonably
object and that it is authoritarian parents who, «if challenged, threaten punishment and give «because I
say so» as a reason for compliance.»