Sentences with phrase «when saying the topic»

Eric is correct when he says this topic was previously taught in New York's Algebra 2 / Trigonometry course, the third course in the high school sequence.

From political ads to Live crimes to former employees expressing concern over its effects, Zuckerberg's not kidding when he says the topics he means to address would have to encompass «history, civics, political philosophy, media, government, and of course technology.»

Not exact matches

But when people actually engage with the topic and think about and discuss mortality, he said, «It enriches life.

That way they feel bought into the topics when you meet and if they DO have a burning topic on their mind (let's say their upset about something)-- you get a chance to learn about it in advance and come more prepared.

Said another way, when buyers express concerns, objections or otherwise «negative» conversation topics, it could be a positive signal for the deal.

Yes, of course you need to get through your requirements, but after that an idiosyncratic pick with an inspiring or thought - provoking teacher («When I think about the classes that shaped me the most, I think about my Marxist Canadian history class, taught by a socialist ideologue,» says Blattman) beats on on - topic one taught by a snooze - inducing robot.

On Thursday, the British newspaper The Guardian published what it said were leaked internal editorial guidelines for how to handle Trending Topics, including rules for when to remove certain terms and when to include them.

Hettiarachchi says that a common mistake beginners make when crafting their speeches is by starting with a topic.

Since Reddit is primarily a social community, with tens of thousands of discussion threads or «sub-Reddits» devoted to various topics, what users mean when they say they «get news» from the site is probably a bit different than getting news from a newspaper.

When pushed on the topic of investing in current operations or buying assets, the CEO said, «This is an environment where, in many respects, buy, rather than build, is more attractive.»

One of the barometers of good content is that it isn't just a rehash of what you have said before which makes life difficult when you have been writing content regularly on the same topics.

When the topic was raised in the Debate Prentice said school boards had $ 460 million in their reserve funds and should use these funds to deal with overcrowded classrooms.

Q Sarah, you said earlier that, when you've given answers around this general topic, you gave us the best information you had at the time.

I can't tell you how many Christians that I've debated on the gay marriage topic who finally, when presented with theological, social, and reasonable evidence to the contrary, just end up saying «just because.»

No where in her article did she say, «Do not study the Bible» she's simply saying that love is one of God's teachings and it's often the topic people want to discuss most of all when they're near the precipice.

For instance Matt 19 is in my Bible and in it Peter says to Jesus «Then it is better not to marry» when discussing the topic of divorce.

You're basically saying that when people get on a forum to discuss their opinions — however off topic they may be @ times — is nothing but embarrassment to our nation.

i can referrence any «bible» when talking about any holy book and still use it properly but not change the topic of discussion... this is the times when i wish i was still in talking terms with my old professor, such mistakes would not have happened and a grand conversation may have ensued... whatever... as i said

«She said that we'd come to the point in our science topic [evolution] when we had to choose between believing the science and believing in God.»

The point of all this was to say - why was it so easy to accept something written by this author when the Bible covers this topic (re: Saul visiting the witch of Endor) and everything else.

When the topic is «what Hitler said or believed», then Hitler's own words are indeed the relevant truth.

They said of Him, «He speaks as one having authority» Matthew 7:29 When you go back and look at what Jesus said, He never had to use references to support His ideas or topics.

You said, «Considering the consistent treatment of this topic on this blog» The topic of abortion comes up on occasion when some religious lunatic tries to force his or her moronic beliefs on the sane part of society.

Biblicism falls apart, Smith says, because of the «the problem of pervasive interpretive pluralism,» for «even among presumably well - intentioned readers — including many evangelical biblicists — the Bible, after their very best efforts to understand it, says and teaches very different things about most significant topics... It becomes beside the point to assert a text to be solely authoritative or inerrant, for instance, when, lo and behold, it gives rise to a host of many divergent teachings on important matters.»

I re-read a book recently, and the author wrote about how she was supposed to speak at an event, and when she asked which topic they would like to here her expound upon, they said, well, just tell us what is saving your life right now.

And yes, one wishes that the unshakeable commitment to religious freedom didn't get shaken so much when the topic is, say, forcing pro-life pharmacists to issue morning - after pills or requiring Catholic hospitals to perform abortions.

In English we expect that when a sentence starts with that, it is referring to the topic of the previous sentence, but in Greek the word can have an implied «As I was saying earlier.»

Another Christian divorcee, Erik Castenskiold spoke frankly of his experience when the topic of his divorce comes into a conversation: «You certainly get a different reaction in their face when they find out you've been married before,» he said.

When folks enter into debate and discussion on topics in a public forum, they should be prepared to be held accountable for what they write and say.

preacherlady, this is a big problem I have when discussing topics such as this with some believers — they read something into what I said, that I did not say.

When I say let's agree to disagree on how we see this topic, he says it is not him, but God who has given the commandant about remarrying.

I re-read a book recently, and the author wrote about how she was supposed to speak at an event, and when she asked which topic they would like to here her expound upon, they said, well, just tell us what...

I have never, ever heard him say anything like this before, even when asked specifically about this topic.

Regarding «properly understanding what the Bible says on that topic» — How do you know your words are properly understood when you string together a bunch of ideas?

When Lisa and I were talking about this topic the other day, she said our kids were already deconstructing before we were because we allowed them to question from an early age.

Here, most Americans filter everything they say now so that it is actually boring to try and hold a discussion with anyone — or they discipline you when you formulate an opinion on just about every topic.

Yes, it seems that we do indeed disagree on the topic, but I mean when you started off your very first comment with IDIOT, well I'm afraid that says a lot.

We recently spoke with Eldredge about why he wanted to tackle the controversial (just ask Rob Bell) topic of the afterlife, what happens when people die and what the Bible might really say about heaven and hell.

When asked how church leaders typically respond to the topic of sex abuse in the Church, he said: «There are some that respond very well.

When the topic of race comes up I will often hear someone, usually a northerner, say something derogatory about the «deep south.»

Even personal posts tend to be more on the positive side because often, when I think of sharing more serious topics I hear that silly voice that says «Nobody wants to read that Christal, don't bother».

Off topic and I don't know if anyone already posted this but did anyone see Claude's interview after the Liverpool game on ArsenalFanTV??? Just when I got over the Benzema crap he says that LOL.

Had to put a pin in this topic, or move it to the parking lot, or whatever the hell people are saying these days when they're being too PC to tell someone they have terrible ideas.

Off Topic: I don't like it when some fans and pundits say Arsenal are up there because teams like Chelsea and Manchester United are struggling this season... Come on, is it our fault they are struggling more than us?

First, as to your claim that I can't say we when referring to the Celtics, I encourage you to read this article I wrote about one year ago on that topic.

Now on to the topic of MING (flash Gordon), from my understanding he is actually a center back that was asked to play left back and has gotten good at it, do we need him when we have young talented players such as Hayden, Chambers, O'connor, and Ajayi, well i would say YES.

I was shocked when some1 here (cant remember his name) called me an idiot just because i said we should always try to discuss the topic on ground rather than regurgitating the same abusive comment over and over in all threads.

Off Topic: just wondering how many players when committing to the club say that manager was influential in their decision.

I was watching Arsenal Fan TV and Robbie made an interesting comment on this topic when a Chelsea fan said that Kolasinac should have been also sent off.

Off topic — anyone who has played sport knows you never say things are going well... from the interview Mustafi did when he said that he lost next 3 in a row, played crap and got injured... just saying!