Sentences with phrase «when see proof»

One can only wonder what their real agenda is — especially when you see the proof.

The throat tightening when see proof of your best friend's baby's first steps on Facebook as your same - aged kiddo is just beginning to crawl.

When I see proof that these miraculous events are physically possible in our universe, then I'll reconsider.

When I see proof that there is more to it than just dying, I will switch to your side.

(AP)-- A woman who sued Match.com after being sexually assaulted by a man she met on the dating website settled her lawsuit on Tuesday when she saw proof that the site was screening its members for sexual predators.

Not exact matches

But when you see it yourself, the proof is in the pudding.

A psychological phenomenon known as «negative social proof» would argue that the «right thing» to do becomes questionable when people see the right people doing the wrong things.

The most successful founders I see wait to raise — they wait to demonstrate traction and hit proof - points that represent real step - change for their companies — and when they do, they ask for a lower range.

Pure Barre is proof that age is such an insignificant factor when it comes to fitness and the changes your body can see!

When Caspar succeeds in switching Ethereum to a proof - of - stake platform, we're going to see it skyrocket in popularity.

Now chad, I don't expect you to see just how idiotic that statement is, you've proven yourself to be immovable when it comes to stupidity so I'll just leave you with this, I positively believe that god is not real, but I don't have proof to prove otherwise so I don't spend any time on it.

So, while your at it how about you providing that irrefutable proof that there is no such God out there who does not want to be made known but would rather have us rely on having faith and that through relying on faith to see whether we would be willing to follow God on our own accord even when there is no irrefutable proof as opposed to having that irrefutable proof and thus having to follow becuase of having really no choice because of obligation.

When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.

Consequently, when they see every kind of proof they will not believe.

I don't need no proof when it comes to God and truth I can see the sunset and I perceive» [Heaven — Live — 2003]

So its ok for him to prove his points (which btw science can not prove something to be real when it comes to THEORIES which is what evolution is, which i believe to be true), yet when someone wants to believe in something that they see points to proof in thats not ok?

u guys are just proof of the devil's relentless ways of deceiving the world, one day u will see that this life was a feeble one compared to the one that some fortunate indivuduals will be able to spend in paradise, while others unfortunately will perish forever, most people do nt like to think that when they die they are going to be held accountable for how they carried out their life, which is unfortunate, because there are goona be a lot of people who are gonna be uncomfortably hot for the rest of eternity

The key is this, when you are an athiest and want to see the proof of God, simply follow the Christian code to be honest with God.

And when Jesus says that no one can come to Him unless it was granted to him by the Father, this is seen as proof for Irresistible Grace.

Why is it not acceptable to simply concede that I don't know whether a god exists or not, when I've seen no evidence to show there is one nor have I seen any proof there isn't one?

And, although the five classical proofs may seem abstract and arid in these days, when we have grown unaccustomed to the language of metaphysics, they are neverthelessa reasoned statement of the conviction most men either hold, or wish they could hold; namely that things seen are the work of an invisible Creator.

Given that evolution is forced to be taught in classrooms, with no proof, I guess I can't see how anyone would leave God, for nothing, especially when they're forced to believe it.

Believers like to avoid the real issue of evidence but they like to use words like «see» to imply that there is some sort of empirical proof, when really, they mean «believe».

And you'll see the proof when she wins her case in court... assuming it goes that far.

And even more irony is seen when the «science only» people lean on mathematic formulae and theories to explain the universe, but their only proof is more math... Math proving math, but no observable reality to back up the math.

How can you possibly look for the proof of God's existence, if you don't know what that proof will look like when you see it?

When he studied the lives of those who gave themselves to the search for truth, he saw that they might be classified in four groups: the scholastic theologians, who proclaimed themselves the followers of reason and speculation; the Isma`ilis and other Shi`as who held that to reach truth one must have an infallible living teacher, and that there always is such a teacher; the philosophers, who relied on logical and rational proofs; and the Sufis, who held that they, the chosen of God, could reach knowledge of Him directly in mystical insight and ecstasy.

Usually when I think of olive oil I think about savory dishes, but these cookies are proof that olive oil deserves a spot in the baking seen.

but go back and watch a replay of a game when Gilberto was out of the line up how Wenger could have had The Invisible Wall... in the squad and NOT seen the importance signing a DM over the sumner is just proof he is blind to what was the real reasons for past success and what has been missing in the squads since.

Beyond that... using a hypothetical scenario where you don't know what would've happened as proof the process doesn't work is stupid when instead you can just look at the present and see the team won 52 games this year and has multiple stars.

Forgot about Xhaka there when I proof read it, Xhaka needs to reinvent himself and who knows maybe with some competition we would see Xabi Alonso feat Pirlo.

To come from the person who saw the potential in Henry before everyone all the way to favour iwobi instead of lacazette or wilshere is enough proof of when a once progressive wenger became senile.

We saw proof of this later when we watched a rhino repeatedly charge an elephant until the elephant finally had enough and sent the rhino on its way much sadder for the encounter.

If you could show me an instance, say, when Wenger said I did not see it because I was in the toilet, but the video footage showed him on the touchline that would be the proof required for me to have to agree with you.

even though there is no proof of him personally taking any money out of the club they would have to declare it under these new financial regulations that have come in, any and all monies going out of the club has to be put in black and white on the accounts and i didn't see that kronke has taken anything when i read them the other day.

When asking your guests to «baby proof» themselves, it may be best to put it in a way that makes them see why it is important for your child's safety, like your child's tendency to put anything he finds on the floor in his mouth.

Not only is it bad enough that they have their hands in your mouth so you can't speak anyway, but how on earth do I lie when they can clearly see the crappy proof that I don't.

When I've seen proof that I'm wrong about something, I've admitted it.

The argument that the death and complication rates for homebirth when there is little to no legal route (Yes, CNMs are able to perform homebirth in NC but they are required to be overseen by an Obstetrician and therefore most work in birthing centers and hospitals) are proof of why it should not be considered for legalization and regulation is the same one seen when abortion is prohibited.

When we were out baby proofing a home in Orange County California, we saw this climbing and falling hazard.

I need no better proof than to see the excitement on my daughter's face when she yells, «Yay, we all eat together!»

Baby proofing your house isn't always about what you perceive as dangers but what your children see when they move through the home.

When you baby proof with the understanding that everything you see will eventually end up in your baby's mouth or be used as a catapult it definitely puts things in a different perspective.

We saw the proof of it last week, when order was restored after a massive show of police strength on the streets.

You can make wild charges, but why get upset when others want to see some proof?

The highlights are the days when I see the rough drafts of papers with the proof — not the speculation, not the hope — that these planets exist.

We believe that you are entitled to see real proof about how NutraSilver performs and that it is safe when used as directed.

I wonder when I see people still talking about any real proofs linking animal protein (yes, the one in eggs whites included) specifically with cancer, and degenerative diseases, ever really knew about The China Study?

Pure Barre is proof that age is such an insignificant factor when it comes to fitness and the changes your body can see!

The material is also squat proof and is not see - through when stretched.