Sentences with phrase «when states»

However, when the states ratified the Constitution (1787 — 88), several leading statesmen regarded the lack of mandatory limits to tenure as a dangerous defect, especially, they thought, as regards the presidency and the Senate.

James Scott recently argued that when states historically tried to levy taxes people would run to the hills, and that the hill cultures reflect this aversion to government.

Indeed, it's sometimes used when the states want to grant more rights than a proposed federal law (e.g. gun control legislation,) but also for federal regulations on everything from schools to roads to environment regulations to commerce regulations, etc..

New York University professor Dr. Marion Nestle — who I greatly admire and respect — is absolutely correct when she states in the article that, despite being no fan (and that's an euphemism, if I ever heard one!)

When she states; «Small business owners typically have to buy into a brand / company with a minimum order amount, which ties up a lot of their funds, and then they are required to sell the products only at MSRP pricing.

offers some great advice when he states that:

But that and many of the sport's other plans flamed out after the recession, when the states that many fans come from — Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and California — were hit the hardest by the economic crash.

@ the Analyzer WENGER is absolutely right when he states «We are not on that case.

Cech is very much correct in his opinion when he states that the Europa league has become much more attractive to clubs across Europe.

Ma is 100 % correct when he states that sports are not stable and that you must adapt in order to remain profitable.

Mr Burke says he is under no illusion there will be a single moment when all states are completely happy with the plan.

When the States go beyond the limits, the Christian has a duty to follow his conscience in obedience to God and the Church.

Much more in the way of application is needed, something Jones himself recognizes when he states in his introduction that «I do not display here the substantive difference a Trinitarian perspective brings to various issues and often vexing problems.»

However, I think it fair to note as well that when he states that «one of the things in the abusers» minds was that the interrogators wanted and approved of some abuse,» that claim is based principally on what the abusers said.

For example when he states «It is through Jesus, for the first and only time in history, we get to see and hear God exactly as he is», that's biblical illiteracy.

how can you miss a point when he states that he's completely and formally carnal?

While the Letter to the Hebrews does not specifically mention the Eucharist, it surely has this in mind in when it states in connection with Christ's priesthood, «We have confidence to enter the sanctuary by the Blood of Jesus, by the new and living way which He opened for us through the curtain, that is, through His flesh.»

When harmony no longer prevailed throughout the six kinships, filial sons found their manifestation; when the states and clans fell into disorder, loyal ministers appeared.

When He states that He created the earth in six days, I believe that He did it, because it is possible for HIm to do it.

Indeed, Reagan comes closest to grasping the civil religious truth of the matter when he states that «politics and morality are inseparable.

Well, the article is flawed from the outset when it states that Evangelicalism has «lost its way.»

One thing is indisputable and that is that Fr Peter Gumpel SJ who listened as a boy in church to the 1937 Encyclical Mit Brennender Sorge (With Burning Sorrow) is not exaggerating when he states that it was that Encyclical (Pacelli revised the first draft by the archbishop of Munich, Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber) which so infuriated Hitler that it caused him to refuse to see or speak to anyone for three days.

When states attempted to step in and limit the freedom of the church to operate these schools, the church was quick to cry foul and repair to the courts.

When he states that the truth or plausibility of the statements used to defend theistic belief in the face of evil «are utterly beside the point,» he is saying that the truth or plausibility of such statements is not necessary to preserve logical consistency, and this even Griffin does not deny is correct.

Marianne Sawicki is right when she states, «The first evangelists find that they can not bring anyone to the possibility of resurrection through the mere telling of a story.»

ken margo is stating a fact about so called parents or Christians as well as your politicians, when he states that they do nt care, Gods word says it best my words are on your lips but your hearts are far away from me.

I do take issue, however, with Hancock when he states that the natural sciences are «for the most part... safely insulated from the questions of ultimate purpose that condition our understanding of the meaning of education.»

Especially, when it states clearly that this was the LAPD and that it only «proposed using U.S. census data and other demographic information to pinpoint various Muslim communities...,» not that it actually did use census data.

As a result, the video is partially correct when it states that salvation is «a transformation of ourselves right here right now»

I leave you with my God's words, Jesus himself when he states: «Your approval means nothing to me, because I know you don't have God's love within you.

I.e. the Didache (70 ~ 150 AD) when it states «Confess your sins in church, and to not go up to prayer with an evil conscience.

I don't know if Mohler is correct when he states that, «young people can now see millions that are missing from their own generation,» but it sure rings false.

And Bill is right when he states that it is wrong to teach children such foolishness!

What does the Masai Creed actually mean when it states, regarding Jesus» time in the grave, «but the hyenas did not touch him»?

But Laszlo certainly has Whitehead's methodology reversed when he states that «not even Whitehead could refrain from interpreting his empirical results as furnishing an analysis of epistemic facts» (BSR 23).4 Whitehead does not interpret physical facts as epistemic ones.

Another potentially crippling compromise allows the ICC to hear cases (again, except for those referred by the Security Council) only when the states involved are unable or unwilling to do so.

Phillip Cary paraphrases point five of the preamble to the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification when he states that the signatories reached a «theological consensus that Luther's doctrine of justification by faith alone need not be Church - dividing.»

Maclntyre underscores the point about identity being conferred by social institutions when he states that any conception of moral action must be accompanied by a sociology of the same.

Paul addresses a concern of Christian liberty at the end of 1 Corinthians 10, when he states, ««I have the right to do anything,» you say — but not everything is beneficial.

Altizer betrays his assumption of a metaphysics when he states, «Hegel's central idea of kenosis, or the universal and dialectical process of the self - negation of being, provided me with a conceptual route to a consistently kenotic or self - emptying understanding of the Incarnation, an understanding which I believe has been given a full visionary expression in the work of William Blake.»

But Clinton is perfectly consistent when he states doing nothing is not an option and in expressing the view that the Ryan Plan is the wrong way to go.

(The merest whimper of the thesis can be discerned when he states that crusading was «reinvented» after the loss of Jerusalem in 1187, or when he refers to Innocent's contribution to the Crusades as «a sort of creation.»)

Same arguments we heard when states started passing laws that decriminalized interracial marriage, when the federal government rejected «separate but equal», and when people realized the President did not always tell the truth.

And when states fail to increase their per - child payments to keep pace with market rates, parents find themselves armed with a voucher than no one will take: Since the child care providers can make more money accepting a child whose parents can afford to pay market rates, that's what they do.

When states make their pitches to companies, those pitches invariably include selling points that will somehow be paid for by taxpayers.

«When the international community consistently fails to act, there are times when states are compelled to take their own action,» Haley said.

Stephen Gordon is absolutely correct when he states that «the surge in income at the top has been driven by earned income, not their asset holdings».

His legal background proved invaluable in 1991, when the state of California and its insurance commissioner John Garamendi seized Raleigh's then - financial partner Executive Life Insurance Company after the value of the insurer's multibillion - dollar portfolio collapsed — a fate tied to its massive investments in the junk bond market of the go - go 1980s.

Costa Rica recently made headlines when its state - run utility company said it had gone a full 76 days without using fossil fuels, beating their own record of 75 days last March.

Not only will they know to pay attention when you state their name (therefore evading the possibility of having to repeat the question), but Bob won't start talking the same time as Anna and spend the next 2 minutes saying, «No really, you go ahead.