Sentences with phrase «when supernatural»

For Reese, life ended when the supernatural entity called the Oneness threw her out.

But when another Supernatural family puts a hit on her she's forced to go into hiding with Julian, her gorgeous new Guardian Angel.

Now, Davis turns his attention to the macabre in the all - new «A Good and Useful Hurt,» in which tattoo artist Mike's life is torn apart when a supernatural, psychopathic killer targets him and those he loves.

, When Supernatural Battles Became Commonplace and Nyarko - san, took the stage this weekend at the Kanagawa Prefectural Music Hall to celebrate the 10th anniversary of light novel imprint GA Bunko (created in January 2006).

They'll be releasing: Wish Upon The Pleiades - Monday 17th October 2016 When Supernatural Battles Become Common Place - Monday 31st October 2016.

When the supernatural element eventually kicks in we are exposed to ghost children and the chief antagonist himself the pagan demon Bagul / Mr Boogie.

When supernatural elements rear their heads, he is at a complete loss as to how to handle it.

THE DARKNESS: A trip to the Grand Canyon turns terrifying when a supernatural entity awakens and follows a family home.

But when the supernatural villain Kai begins to sweep across China defeating all the kung fu masters, Po must do the impossible — learn to train a village full of his fun - loving, clumsy brethren to become the ultimate band of Kung Fu Pandas!

Marrow tries to convince them that it's all part of the study, but when the supernatural events start becoming malevolent, it's every man and woman for themselves.

Years ago, the witching hour was a time when supernatural creatures, like witches and demons, were thought to be powerful.

It was a dangerous night when supernatural beings were abroad and all animals could speak.

When the supernatural is invoked, it clearly means the person has no actual explanation and wants to resort to «I don't want to look like I don't know, so I'll just say that it's magic».

This is wrong: (1) it might not be possible to «judge» human laws in a supernatural way, especially when the supernatural hasn't been shown to exist; (2) we as humans judge human laws all the time — we do it through philosophy, political science, and economics, for instance.

Polanyi places this idea in historical context: «when the supernatural authority of laws, churches and sacred texts had waned or collapsed, man tried to avoid the emptiness of mere self - assertion by establishing over himself the authority of experience and reason.»

When the supernatural is made «safe,» the stakes vanish.

Not exact matches

Netflix description: «When a young boy vanishes, a small town uncovers a mystery involving secret experiments, terrifying supernatural forces and one strange little girl.»

«This person told this unnamed person about what they hear this person saw, and so I wrote it down, but you won't know who I am either» just doesn't cut it, Chad when it comes to supernatural claims.

But when people go around making statements and claims that their particular supernatural explaination is just as real as the car in the street, don't be surprised that people will call them on their claim.

Don't be too upset with people for being this way — it takes a supernatural force to overcome the natural desire to lash out when you feel you've been shown up in some way.

Why immediately jump to a supernatural conclustion when there are many other, more practical reasons?

When it says that as an atheist I disbelieve in God, its because I reject religion and God (in this case, the god of abraham), where as I still am open to the possibilty of there being a god, or supernatural diety.

It is perhaps telling that, when describing the Christian background of the movement, he notes that «religious beliefs crucial to such warfare placed enormous significance on imagined awesome but reassuring supernatural forces of overwhelming power and proximity.»

You have chosen to believe it's not possible for God to exist a priori so any possible indication that he may, you simply reject as not possible even when there is no other scientific explanation for credible miraculous events (ones that can not be mere coincidences) other than supernatural.

His conversion took place when he was 25 and was sparked by an extraordinary dream; a story he tells alongside many other supernatural accounts in his 2015 book, Miracles (Hodder & Stoughton).

When a potential leader of our country receives guidance and direction from the supernatural, you bet it's our business.

In response, he spoke on how Christians sometimes pause when a story about supernatural phenomenon isn't directly ascribed to God.

and I can tell you that Daniel and Joseph of the bible are exactly the perfect examples of Gods prophetic power, when He gifts his servants with supernatural power and guidance.

Humans have a history of inventing supernatural answers when they have no real means to answer a question.

There's no reason to get frustrated any more than one should be frustrated when getting no response from a corpse; resurrection is a supernatural work.

What you say does nothing to invalidate my point, which is that when people believe in the supernatural they'll attribute phenomenon in the real world to with even though they have no rational reason to do so.

It adheres faithfully to the rule that supernatural horror is all the more terrifying when it is barely seen or explained.

When someone has an experience he can't explain, it's creepy because they can't explain it, not because it's supernatural.

I grant you Jeremy that the very fact of us waking in the morning, breathing and all the other miracles of life are amazing, we call that the natural but we don't have to ask and trust God in that, but when it comes to the supernatural, thats a different thing all together.

We have to account for the supernatural when the Devil took Jesus up to the highest mountain to show him all of the kingdoms of the world.

What use is it resorting to the supernatural when there are just plain boring natural explanations to be had?

History shows us that people often make up explanations involving God or other supernatural forces to explain things when they have no other explanation.

It was when the youngster Edward Holloway tried to encourage a «girl who was just a friend» to go to daily Mass that he realised that what he truly desired was not the intimacy of a purely natural, human friendship but the supernatural friendship of Christ.

If this is so, it does not make sense to suddenly postulate supernatural causes or metaphysical purposes when these events happen to have a strong impact on our lives.

When it comes to your supernatural claims, there are no first hand eye witness accounts of your claims.

It was the kind of body we ordinarily mean when we speak of a body, though it also had supernatural properties.

So you would believe that a supernatural being stuck his finger is some mud, created a human being, loosened a snake that charmed a woman created when this being yanked a rib out to take off her clothes and seduce a man who then commits incest to create more humans??

it should though when you experience something that is without a doubt supernatural, and anyone with intelligence can understand that a revelation or a message that takes a sovereign «person» to translate something in the near, or distant future, it is PROOF, of God, just is the bible is proof of God, as it is His very Word through the direct revelation to the prophets.

They are all so many expressions of the fact that when our eyes are opened to the finitude, insufficiency, or contingency of ourselves and the environing entities, we perceive every aspect of these entities as pointing directly to a supernatural cause.

I love it when people like you try to present the idea that faith is a wash between spiritual believers and those without a belief in the supernatural.

In later centuries his miracles became central again when people were less sceptical about the supernatural.

When you have felt His presence, His peace, heard Him speak to your heart, had supernatural experiences with no earthy explanation, you could not possibly think, «Perhaps this is all there is.»

There will always be two sides when it comes to the supernatural, and both sides can be true.

For example, Jesus didn't know when he would return (Matthew 24:36), and it was the Holy Spirit who gave Jesus supernatural knowledge (Mark 2:8), and the power to do miracles (Matthew 12:28; Luke 4:14,18).

Why should any writings be taken seriously that encapsulate the supernatural components when their authorship is so uncertain?