Sentences with phrase «when teams attack»

Liverpool are at their best when teams attack them and leave space for them to exploit with their blistering speed up front.

I like Allegri a lot, but he has to be decisive when his team attacks and when they defend.

When the team attacks the back 4 never stops defending and what happens in the event Ivanovic moves forward is Azpilicueta hangs back and Matic drifts slightly to the right, as a result you get the width to overload the wing and still have the defensive solidity of set of 4 defenders.

Miran I don't get y u are on Lingard, when the team attacks he plays really well with Mata and Pogba but when we are defensive he sticks to defending and can't really be himself.

Not exact matches

At Eleven, we encourage people to «pause» their efforts when they hit a wall and find new stimulation — whether that be joining another agency team for a while to hear how they're attacking their assignment, or going to a movie, concert or event to jump into someone else's story.

He was using Excel, PowerPoint, and Google Earth to help map his team's sense of interpersonal and tribal relations, learn where local favor could be won, and try to predict where and when the next deadly attack might unfold.

«Strategy drives successful performance, and when you are managing virtual teams, a clear plan of attack is even more important.

The balance between attack and defence must be right for a team to work and Wenger got it spectacularly wrong by taking Coq off when we got a goal back.

Here he becomes the extra defender when we are under attack, he becomes the extra midfielder when we need to subdue a team that puts in a fight and he becomes the extra man running in to flick the ball past the goalkeeper when we are attacking.

Chambers is a forth choice Center half, that means he is not going to be playing all the time, he is going to be rusty when we put him into games versus good attacking teams, his job at the moment is to sit and learn from those ahead of him.

Too many players - Cazorla / Podolski, Wilshere, Ozil just jog back when opposition teams counter attack!

He's an excellent distributor as you saw today and when we are simply attacking the other team, he is in his element.

The «extra man» would force errors when we are attacking by the opposing team's confusion over who to mark, he would close down the enemy in the midfield and he would help steal the initiative off the opponent attackers by his mobility to position himself at the less served areas.

I disagree.A wingback can be viewed as a defensive winger.Whether the Ox likes it or not he's been blessed with the qualities of a winger.To me that's his best position.He's only doing well as a wingback because of his attacking abilities.As I said earlier a wingback can be viewed as a sort of defensive winger.That's why CB's who are used as RB or LB can not play wingback.Wingback needs the player to be able to adapt himself like a winger while also being solid defensively.Ox has the attacking part but not the defensive part.With Bellerin we have the best of both worlds.He can attack, defend and also has the speed necessary to play wingback.I fear Ox being played at wingback will cost us when we play teams with tricky wingers.He should rather be challenging Sanchez or Ozil for their positions and not wingback.The guy hates to always have to defend which in truth he can't.

Every year, we have the same shortcomings: — Bad organization defensively, especially our attacking midfielders lack defensive discipline — We get bullied physically — We are not charged up for all games — More injuries than almost any other team How can these things be explained, when they are there every year?

I wrote about how important he was in their team a while ago, he's the one starting their attacks like Wilshere, rosicky has done for us when they played, he creates many chances with his one - twos and direct dribbling from the center.

When Arsenal plays against smaller teams, we somehow manage to win the ball back, but playing against biger teams we play like basketball, leting the enemy attack and hope that they do nt succeed in scoring, rather then us winning the ball back.

When figuring out how a team will attack another, it starts at the quarterback position.

And once again, this DMF myth of a player will do fck all for this team... You lot think just one big player in the DM position will change a thing when we have all our attacking players being so careless when they attack, they are the laziest bunch ever to rush back and stop counter attacks..

You can only realize that when a counter attack comes from an opposition team.

as for me ozil is a talented and skilful player but having only that is not enough to win the ever getting stronger premier leage teams, he has to train hard for endurance and be a fighter, he has to come back and press on the opponent defense and even midfieldes to disposes the ball when arsenal loose the ball and go back fast attacking like iwobi and welbeck are doing.

But even when so - called bigger teams come to our place, they have been happy to sit behind the ball, soak up pressure and hit you on the counter attack and that sort of surprised me.

I like how you forget to mention Alexis when you say none of our attacking players would get into our title rival teams.

The danger is when you are an attacking team that you don't score and then of course you create your own problems.»

- walcott is only good to come on when the opposing team is about to start attacking us (when we are a few goals up) for his pace on the counter - having gabriel replace BFG makes arsenal compress the play and play better close intricate passes and take opposing teams apart (he is a welcomed addition)

It's easy to come out and say «it's easier to do that when your team are attack - minded» but it's not.

Its stupid to even try playin on counter attacks when your team suxx in it!

The B'mouth and Chelsea game today is an example of what happens when you have an ineffective attacking unit, where an organized teams can hit you on the counter when the play breaks down in the final third.

You don't need numbers to watch how teams alter their offensive game plan or shy away from attacking the paint when the Stifle Tower is on the court.

When it came to the attacking midfielder slots in the actual team of the year, poor Eriksen never stood a chance.

Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting

Vidal is a box to box he is not a DM and a DM we need... let me put it like this Vidal will try grab glory by getting goals (much like flamini) we will not take up true glory like Coquelin who knows his job is not to attack but to protect our back 4... not go for gaols but look hold up play when we are getting hit with a counter until the rest of the team get back into play... Someone who will get battered and bruised but not lose his temper or cool but instead battle get in good tackles and disturb the opponents Rhythm...

When one analyzes the 4 games in which the team conceded three or more goals, a number of factors come into play: attacking players losing balls in our defensive third, attacking players not committing fouls when they lose the ball to stop counters, attacking players not tracking back to defend, and attacking players lacking a defensive mindsWhen one analyzes the 4 games in which the team conceded three or more goals, a number of factors come into play: attacking players losing balls in our defensive third, attacking players not committing fouls when they lose the ball to stop counters, attacking players not tracking back to defend, and attacking players lacking a defensive mindswhen they lose the ball to stop counters, attacking players not tracking back to defend, and attacking players lacking a defensive mindset..

When coquelin and Gibbs came on it meant we had 2 left backs and 2 DM's, & at that point we let them have quite a few meaningful attacks and if it was a more clinical team we wudv drawn the game.

When I used to play we used to call games like this one a «light your cigar» game as you knew that the other team had no attack and you did not have to try that hard to keep a clean sheet.

AKBs will attack by saying OG is the main striker for the France national team; but our style of play is not like France so when we need prolific strikers, don't compare based on who plays and who doesn't for France..

quite frankly, I lov this team, and consider the fellow fans my commerades, not my enemy, so it annoys me when we attack each other w venom that should be reserved for MUtd fans, Spurs fans... No one seems to be debating the players today?

until wenger really stresses on defending and forgoes this «attack the whole game» policy, arsenal do nt stand a chance to win major honours.also do keep in mind, attacking whole game drains out the players.better to put handbrake on and play when team has a 2 or 3 goal lead focussing on keeping posession and positioning... but i guess wenger will always go for the «u score 3, we score 4».

John Dromo, head coach of Louisville, had not watched his team perform since early January when he suffered a heart attack.

It's the old greedy bolloxs tactic which deliberately stops your team mate from attacking the opponents goal while it gives you the chance to run into the box and gain the glory when the cross comes in... i hope that made some sense???

Those players you highlighted do not play in a team that goes gung - ho in attack, if you consider Arsenal set - up we play so high up the pitch that we leave our defence exposed, there are even times when our defenders also play a very high line and all this is Wenger's instruction...

Many fans were hoping for a goal-fest when we played host to Manchester City, with both teams known for their attacking flair far more than their defensive stability.

I'll be the first to admit counter attacking football and Arsenal should go together like cookies and cream but ever since the invicibles teams have refused adamantly to play high defensive lines against us and counters do not work if the opposition has a defensive 5 or 6 set up near the edge of their box when you finally get the ball up there.

Haven't you noticed how 9 times out of 10 he passes the ball behind his team mate, when in an attacking position, just so that he can run into the box to receive the ball back again, He rarely gives a forward pass in that situation, his too selfish and greedy!

The «extra man» would force errors when we are attacking by the opposing team confusion over who to mark, he would close down the enemy in the midfield and he would help out steal the initiative off the opponent attackers by his mobility to position himself at the less served areas.

Has anyone ever notice when the team counters in high speed and gives the ball to Giroud, the rest tends to slow down a bit coz that pornstar would never turn and continue the attack... with Giroud on the pitch, every play ends with a cross.

He's a real threat when we are a goal up and play the counter attacking style, but if we chase a game against a deeper sitting team we are in trouble with him.

I will hear that Walcott is not defensive enough and all that, but not many players were before, now when the team is attacking and defending like a unit, then Walcott will also get into the rythm, He has just come from an injury, he might not have been lethal enough but he is still good as a winger, he can make runs behind defenses, he is a good crosser, he can test the keeper...

we need to score 2 - 3 more when a team is attacking us.

My question to you @Midkemma how do we challenge for a title when the main man leading our attack has the same goal ratio as a striker leading the line for a team fighting for their very survival???