Sentences with phrase «when walcot»

Arsenal have Ozil, carsolar, and rosisky for No 10 position which are to b rotated depending on the game at hand while ramsey, whilshare and maybe OX fights for BOX to Box player and some game when walcot is not available rosisky or nabery can play from the right.....

Somehow sanchez plays better when walcot's up top, I'm not discrediting Giroud, but I have noticed this.

We were still playing target man when walcot came on.

Giroud is not the answer though Sanchez could be.But I do nt see AW playing Sanchez any time soon (even when Walcot returns.)

Not exact matches

He is not what we need, we have started with Alexis and Walcot at the beginning of the season, they did very well both scoring goals but suddenly, we changed the lineup because OG scored goals when brought in as substitute.

Would you say Walcot or OX are better than Perez when it comes to that?

I find it disgusting when Wenger get praised even in the face of inadequacy, Wenger lost to barcelona, not those players with his 2substitutions, why he opt for Walcot when he had Joel and d beasty Welbeck is still a mystery to me.

Beside the issue of Walcot's contract, Wenger loves his midfielders and in fairness to him, when we play Ramsey on the right, we don't have a lot of movement behind the opposition's defence and we are not as fast as we are when playing wWalcot's contract, Wenger loves his midfielders and in fairness to him, when we play Ramsey on the right, we don't have a lot of movement behind the opposition's defence and we are not as fast as we are when playing walcotwalcot.

Obviously Walcot still has some supporters on here, though when you actually go to the ground and ask those there you rarely find one who thinks him good enough for us.

Yes walcot to me is our 2nd / 1st deadliest player when it comes to scoring, assisting.

How come now, all are hoping Walcot plays well with England, when rubbishing him before.

The issue with walcot is his reputation when it comes to contracts.

It amazes me why people always mention Theo Walcot when discussing players to be sold.

As nice as walcot is, his agent is a pain in the a $ $ when it is contract renewal time.

Walcot is the most difficult arsenal player when it comes to contract renewals.

i rate him highly, he is a box to box player but can play as a cover for Ozil and can give a better balance to the team than walcot when he plays in the left wing which is not either his preferred place nor his natural one.

everybody is talking about walcot must go or should go but the person in my opinion that needs catching on is wilshere gosh wtf atleast ramsey can score or can hold his position when played out of position.

I remember it was early September someone to amend me when when the coach promised goals after a long run with Giroud failed to show consistent upfront, the manager decided to plug walcot upfront and sudenly, the goals were flowing.

When he comes back and gets a couple of games with Wellbeck, Sanchez and Walcot all running around in front of him then we can properly judge his performances.

its not negativity is simple logic, we couldnt beat chelsea with this same line up, and when ramsey was injured, wilshere got up from bench, so Walcot is out for sure

If i was Wenger, I would have sold Walcot to liverpool for 30m and buy pedro from baca to compete with the OX on the wing and fill in for sanchez when he needs to rest... IMO Pedro is a far better and sharper ball player than Walcot and has a better Work ethics.

OG can scores goals but not good enough to our playing style especially when we want our super players like Sanchez and Ozil to control the pitch, Walcot always grantees that to the team, he may score less but contributes a lot to the team.

Walcot has scored some few ha tricks already, I don't remember when OG did it.

our game changed when campbell switched with walcot..

Walcot can play that pacey mobile striker role when he is sharp and fit, Dance can, even Welbeck can play it and we have Lil Akpom.

Walcot helped get us into third position when Manchester United were breathing down our necks.

I think lets throw all our bullets start giroud walcot Campbell (who I think is a better goal threat than chamberlain) when we face olympiacos....

When RVP was in Arsenal walcot was unplayable.

when will wenger realise walcot giroud combo cant deliver arsenal top quality... never am sorry to say...

When Giroud comes back, together with Walcot and Sanogo (and every other injured player), I hope Wenger's team selection would be based on form and tactical compatibility.

Players scores Chech 8.5 top saves when needed Monreal 7 good steady game as always Mert 6 did ok The boss 6 looked tired Bel 7.5 good game needs work on crossing Walcot 5 did less than iwobi Cmpbell 7.5 worked hard, in front of ox and walcott anyway Flamini 7 steady Ox 4 poor all game not a clue how he gets a game Ramsey 5 very selfish player, if barca pay 50m take it and sigh Barkley for 35 Giroud 6.5 missed very good chance and doesn't hold the ball up at important times but had an ok performance Iwobi 7 did more than walcott in 15 mins Chambers not on long enough

But why Walcot as ST when OG is bettet in the air and with our tiny mid field could use his presence?

Messi said the same thing about Theo Walcot when he was left out of the 2010 World Cup squad.

I just don t get how some here are happy with ramsey playing as RW.The lad is good, he has heart but he is not a RW.Welbeck and Walcot are and we are more dangerous when they play in this position.I fear Wenger will never change and will always try to accomodate his favourites in the team.Today Ozil was useless, replace him by Welbeck and shift Ramsey in the middle, but no it has to be a non favourite Coquelin who bring more than any of them.I doubt Arsenal will win any PL title with Maureeno in charge of Chelshi as he is quite more astute on tactic than Wenger.Oh boy, you may always say runner up is not that bad.....

As for that goal walcot missed, that's what u get when someone is not worth 140k a week still u gave it to him.

Even Walcot is not guaranteed to start games when Sanchez is fit.

U are right... whilshare beached while Ox or remsy behind Ozil with a new DM wit sacheZ, welback and Walcot at d front line whil Ozil do all d deadly passes when ever he loose the ball OX pick it up n give him back to continue feeding d 3 jets at d front

i would swap debuchy for bellerin if possible, honestly, i think walcott and bellerin will leave us weak defensively down the right, it might be ok for Sunderland by I understand why wenger did nt want walcot to start on the right with bellerin vs Man U — i think it would put us out of balance on the right, thats why coquelin moved in there when walcott came on.

He looks lost last how Walcot used to when he first came to arsenal.

OT: Watching BARCA now, they are very beatable to counter attack here, can Wenger then make tactical changes when we play them?its a game we can play Walcot as Striker and use Sanchez and Welback on Wings, then press them and counter them....

Flamini was not in the Chelsea box when Willian won the ball but was around the centre circle; if you want to test the claim of who is second best in cases of one versus one try play football yourself rather than try to abuse Theo Walcot; there is a guy called Boateng playing for Baryen and another called Pique playing for Barcelona for comparisons with Per.

Both Giroud and Walcot are useless, but Giroud is better... You will never see walcot involved in d team build up play nor see him hold the ball up under pressure from the opponent... he cant hold d ball, he has cost us so many goals when being dispossessed easiWalcot are useless, but Giroud is better... You will never see walcot involved in d team build up play nor see him hold the ball up under pressure from the opponent... he cant hold d ball, he has cost us so many goals when being dispossessed easiwalcot involved in d team build up play nor see him hold the ball up under pressure from the opponent... he cant hold d ball, he has cost us so many goals when being dispossessed easily....

, debuchy was france 1st choice before he came to us.why is theo walcot under performing?look at bellerin, the guy is going backward, he is not the type of player we new 2 seasons ago, his performance against beryan when we defeated them 2 1 at emirate the same player couldnt track down ordinary richalison.we keep blaming this players, though some are average but ARSENE WENGER does nt develop players, the dressing room is lost, our players are mentally weak, everything we do is outdated, wenger needs to go, our fans in london are not doing enough to make these people know what we fans are going through, i fear for nelson too, cos that guy is exceptional, but soon fans will start condemning him, and its not his fault, how do you expect him to develop when hes being played out of position?WENGER MUST GO!!

I laugh when i read this «Walcot needs to prove himself and needs game time».

Gary Neville didn't hold back when it came to post-Manchester City analysis, picking out Laurent Koscielny, Theo Walcot and Mesut Ozil for special criticism.

Wenger few weeks ago when he was commentin abt walcot said smething age.