Sentences with phrase «when working with traditional publishers»

(For one thing, a self - published author is able to reject covers they don't like, which is rarely an option when working with traditional publishers.)

If you don't mind sharing, what were your biggest points of disillusionment when working with traditional publishers?

In this new world, my gut sense (meaning a wild guess) is that writers will be taking control over more and more aspects of sales, rights, and publishing of their work as they learn how to do it themselves, even when working with traditional publishers.

Foreign publishers are and will be skeptical, but there are some and some more who are looking to find new voices and hoping to discover the gems for less money compared to when working with a traditional publisher.

That's just not the kind of freedom one gets when working with a traditional publisher.

When working with a traditional publisher, the writer is typically working on Book 2 in the time between Book 1 being accepted and it being published.

Not exact matches

All data collected when students work with eContent brings completely new opportunities not available for traditional paper - based textbook publishers.

Emily Victorson, co-founder and publisher of Allium Press of Chicago, will talk about how publishing with a small press differs from self - publishing, when it makes sense to pursue traditional publishing, the advantages of working with a small press, how to identify small presses that might be interested in your work, how to pitch to a small press, and how being published by a small press can be a valuable first step in your publishing career.

A final major benefit of traditional publishing, and what I believe to be the most important, is the fact that, with a publisher, a writer has a team of experts in every aspect of book production — i.e., editing, copy editing, legal review, when necessary, cover design, formatting, marketing, and publicity — who work together with a common, vested interest in making a book the best representation of the author and the publishing house that it can be.

These writers care about producing something of high quality in keeping with the standards of the golden era of traditional publishing: that bygone age when publishers invested time and money (often paying advances directly to authors) to help writers develop and polish their work prior to publication.

One could make the case that when working with someone pursuing traditional publishing the focus could be more on how to best market it for publishers.

With traditional books, since publishers own the rights to them, they can decide when your work has «outlived» its sales potential.

If you work with a traditional publisher, they will set a date for you because your publisher or your editor will give you a deadline for when you need to turn in your manuscript.

Just like any traditional publisher, when you sign a publishing contract with FFF Digital, you sign over certain rights so that we can legally distribute and sell the copyrighted work in your name.

When I read a book from a traditional publisher, I know up front a long of things about the book: 1) a team of editors decided something about the book is good, 2) the book has an editor who worked with the author on content, 3) it has a copy editor who worked on grammar and consistency and 4) it has marketers and publicists who, yes, will probably convince the author not to send a blogger who gives them a negative review hate mail.

«When I started writing, there was really only one way to get published — you worked with a traditional publisher.»