Sentences with phrase «when writing a case»

When writing a case study paper, you need to demonstrate that you can compose a serious paper!

As was pointed to me by a friend, I should have written that Willis Eschenbach is not correct when he writes the cases he cites to are cases opposing «settle and sue scams», but it understandable for a layman to think that they are.

Not exact matches

I wrote a pretty good piece on this a while ago that's worth revisiting and, in case you're too lazy to link back, the three main suggestions are: (1) Get Past the Past as Soon as Possible; (2) Call on Your Customers While You Still Can; and (3) When You're Thinking About Quitting, Remember Why You Started.

«While common wisdom has it that higher volatility necessarily signals a discrete end to the [bull market], it is often the case that higher vol is a natural occurrence in the «late innings» of extended rallies, particularly when the Fed is raising rates, as was the case in late 1999 - 2000,» he wrote.

«In many cases, we succee [d] in doing what we believ [e is] more convenient for us, even when this [is] against our parents» will,» writes Rascon - Ramirez.

In any case, when our egos write checks that reality can't cash, that's self - limiting behavior.

The two Chevron employees were jailed when they refused to sign a supply contract written by PDVSA executives under an emergency decree - which skips the competitive bidding process, according to a half dozen sources close to the case.

I had a killer case of it when I sat down to write my column, the one you're reading right now.

You might think it would have been easy to write about news makers and «the news of the day» but that was not always the case, especially when I was assigned a low interest, low visual, low emotional story about something like a county drainage proposal, rezoning considerations or tax easement issue.

Yet, the current rules require that much of the cost be written off as an expense when it is incurred, meaning that early years in a product development tend to show very low profits, or in some cases even massive losses, with inflated profits toward the end.

Van Valkenburgh wrote that the advocacy center believes that Ether («as it exists today») doesn't qualify as a security, and noted that «Gensler himself suggested why this could be the case when he distinguished between the Ethereum Foundation in 2014 and the Foundation and the Ethereum network, as a whole, today.»

If you don't write a business plan when you're thinking of starting a business, in the best case scenario, you'll be floundering around squandering time and resources.

Van Valkenburgh wrote that the advocacy middle believes that Ether («because it exists lately») does not qualify as a safety, and famous that «Gensler himself advised why this might be the case when he prominent between the Ethereum Foundation in 2014 and the Foundation and the Ethereum community, as a complete, lately.»

In cases where the second written response can not be made within 90 days of your initial complaint, you will be advised about the reason (s) for the delay and you will be given a best estimate as to when you will hear from us again.

You are a complete idiot and the funny thing is you sound intelligent enough to realize it it even when you were writing the post... I will confirm it just in case....

Paleontologist Charles Marshall wrote in his review When Prior Belief Trumps Scholarship published in Science that while trying to build the scientific case for intelligent design, Meyer lets his deep belief to steer his understanding and interpretation of the scientific data and fossil records collected for the Cambrian period.

When he read it, he INSTANTLY wrote about the two amendments, made a case for them and it stuck.

Solzhenitsyn encountered a startling case of rationalization when the Soviet editor Lebedev said to him, «If Tolstoy were alive now and wrote as he did then [meaning against the government] he wouldn't be Tolstoy.»

When I write critically about the emerging church, the same folks jump on board to make a case for their woundedness.

Robert Shank overstates the case when he writes that «outside of Christ this is no election of any man» (Shank, Elect in the Son, 27).

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

As is often the case when I write about confronting doubt or questioning certain theological traditions, I got a message or two urging me to stop asking so many pesky questions and just enjoy the bliss of absolute certainty that should accompany true faith.

«Lewis wrote in a time when, among the educated British public if not among their professional philosophers, there was considerably more agreement than there is now about what constitutes a valid and rational argument for a given case.»

In Mantel's case, when she began writing about Cromwell, by her own account she was «filled with glee and a sense of power,» a conviction that everything in her life had prepared her for this.

All the hateful and ridicling of Christianity aligns with what JESUS said «As the days of Noah, so shall it be the coming of the Son of man» In case you do not have an understanding of that quote, there were people mocking at Noah when he was instructed to build the Ark (Which by the way has been discovered and proven to have existed as written in the Bible).

Time (March 10, 1975, p. 83) introduces its comment on the case with the striking words of the Westminster catechism — a document written in the amazing Cromwellian age of Protestant orthodoxy when moral absolutes were thought to be not only propositional but «in the nature of things.»

I spent time with him in 1971 when I was writing a book on Africa, and I was charmed by his articulate exposition of the case for a «distinctively African sense of community» that made political parties unnecessary.

He wrote out a few prescriptions, and walked away, thinking he had solved another case, when in fact he had failed miserably, because he lacked the prerequisite love.

Parkman, like Foote, wrote history from a point of view: in Parkman's case, the Whiggish conviction that, when Wolfe defeated Montcalm on the Plains of Abraham in 1759, North America was won for liberty against popish authoritarianism.

Just that when you write about Christians it is automatical all about the money (in some cases you are more than correct an dfar from it in others).

I did, nonetheless, gesture towards what such limits might look like when I wrote that we bear a responsibility to intervene when our security is at stake, in cases of exceptional evil, or when we have specifically promised aid and alliance.

Hence John Cobb overstates the case when he writes in his book, A Christian Natural Theology, that in Whitehead's Religion in the Making «God is understood as being affected by the world.

Here he writes, in connection with the question of reconstructing authentic teaching of Jesus, «we have reasonably secure ground under our feet only in one particular instance, namely, when there is some way of showing that a piece of tradition has not been derived from Judaism and may not be ascribed to early Christianity, and this is particularly the case when Jewish Christianity has regarded this tradition as too bold and has toned it down or modified it in some way».

In either case, when the poet has written or a man has prayed, things can not be quite the same again.

5lndeed, I believe Whitehead had his own case in mind when he told Lucien Price that a man does not exhaust his creativity by continual expression but rather he «brings vague ideas into precision by putting them into speech or writing; and by expression he develops his ideas and finds his way to new ones» (DOW 264).

And, I only spend time on longer posts when I am in a healthy discussion with long posts on both sides or I am writing for a double purpose — as is most often the case.

Good point — although you risk ruining it by overstating your case twice, by writing «billion» when you surely mean «million».

Written by «historians» decades and in one case a century after the «fact» before they were even alive from second - hand sources when Christianity was considered a cult.

Twenty years ago, when I wrote the amicus curiae brief for the National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs (COLPA) in the Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman — the landmark case on aid to parochial schools — I truly believed we could win.

So sorry if I seemed like sour grapes (or strawberries as the case may be-lol) when I wrote last night.

It's a nice touch when writing on a blog in any case, and when someone lazily copies and pastes your entire recipe, it gives you every right to ask to have it taken down.

Lolol when I was writing that I was like «what's that annoying word for a group of high school girls???» Google came through for me, idk why that parallel even came to mind with the pumpkin pie spices but I've given up trying to understand my brain ha Well you would be happy to know that in this case even I would ditch bananas in an instant for this version instead.

The next afternoon Chiefs coach Win Case, 33, brought LoVett to Whatley's office for a five - hour evaluation, and when that was over, Whatley spent five hours more — his first all - nighter since graduate school — writing his preliminary report so he could accommodate the school's request that it be delivered the next morning, the last business day before grades were to be posted for the fall term.

When she wrote her «Case Against Breastfeeding», I responded.

In a recent case in 2012, the state of Kansas pursued a known donor (where the child was conceived through at - home insemination) for child support when the child's mother (in a same - sex relationship) applied for government assistance for the child — despite the fact that the known donor had signed a written agreement with the intended parents stating that he would not be a legal parent of the child.

In case you missed them, I've written a bunch of posts since the first one, when I made the declaration that I was done yelling.

Journalist Hanna Rosin waded into that this past spring, when she wrote «The Case Against Breast - Feeding» for The Atlantic magazine.

In any case, most online advocacy vendors find that fewer than 10 % of list members will take the time to edit or add to a pre-written message, and you'll probably see response rates plummet when you start asking for real writing.

Incompetence is when a running mate, during the supreme court petition case is asked the following: «Between a figure written on a cheque and the amount written in words - when in doubt, which one should a banker rely on?»

U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman wrote to the judge presiding over Joe Percoco's bribery case on Saturday, asking if felonious former lobbyist Todd Howe could wear designer duds when the trial resumes tomorrow.