Sentences with phrase «when writing this piece»

When I wrote my piece on the residential housing bubble at RealMoney back in May of 2005, I did not focus on the high prices much; instead, I focused on the financing issues:

Well, it looks like this joker professor of religion does not know what he was talking about when he wrote this piece as the Muslims decry burial at see except when one dies on the sea and it is impractical to get the body to land within 24 hours.

This is a fair observation of my own thought process when writing this piece.

When I wrote my piece I knew many on this site would rubbish it for exactly the reason you mention.

When I wrote this piece, it was clear to me that recent draft history indicates it is folly to write off players being available later than expected, especially at the less valuable positions.

The guy who I was writing about eventually won the Nobel Prize and I think I helped him the Nobel Prize for non-existent phenomenon by virtue of being angry and sarcastic when I wrote the piece so I had learned my lesson as I got older, which is to keep it to yourself.

What does a poet bring to the table when writing a piece about racism that journalists or novelists might not access quite as easily?

You also must respect trademarks and copyrights when writing these pieces.

When I wrote the pieces, Blame Game, and Blame Game, Redux, what I tried to express is that there are a lot of parties to blame in our current crisis, and that everyone should «fess up their culpability.

And, much the same when I wrote my piece on subprime mortgages in November 2006, too much leverage, the teaser rates are short term borrowing, and the loan underwriting was horrible.

As a final note, when I wrote this piece on a similar topic, the country in question did a huge devaluation shortly after it was written.

After a little while I realized that we are facing the same phenomenon as we did back in 2Q 2008, when I write the piece, Another Look at Preliminary Second Quarter GDP.

When I wrote the piece, some people who were friends complained, because they thought that I was too bullish.

When I write a piece where I mention a company, like Assurant, it's fun to see the piece appear on the Yahoo! news.

When I write a piece where I mention a company, like Assurant, it's fun to...

When I write a piece, and entitle it «Toward...» it means that I don't have all of the answers.

I don't know what was going through his head when he wrote the piece.

Ironically when I wrote the piece in 2015 that year was shaping up to be a cool year here, but we then had a very warm December.

When writing the piece the assumption was that this would remain a theoretical discussion for quite some time.

Not exact matches

I wrote a pretty good piece on this a while ago that's worth revisiting and, in case you're too lazy to link back, the three main suggestions are: (1) Get Past the Past as Soon as Possible; (2) Call on Your Customers While You Still Can; and (3) When You're Thinking About Quitting, Remember Why You Started.

In his March note to investors, Marks admits that when he set out to write about liquidity, he didn't believe the topic was all that interesting or profound; in the month since Marks wrote the piece, it has been the market's chief concern.

There is one piece that I can share, though, and that's when you write a recommendation on our app for somebody, they have to pick whether they know you personally, professionally or from dating.

Liz Elam, founder of Link Coworking in Austin and an organizer of the upcoming Global Coworking Uncoference Conference, who also wrote the CNBC piece, expanded on the networking benefits of spaces like hers when we got in touch, noting that interactions with fellow coworking members often go beyond what we traditionally think of as networking to encompass emotional «support.»

«When you are 18 years old and driving your own Dodge Viper, people tend to want a piece of what you are doing,» writes an acquaintance via e-mail.

«People were already busting their tails,» Allen wrote in his Vanity Fair piece, «and it got under their skin when Bill hectored them into doing more.»

Jackson did not speak directly to the issue when summoned, though he elaborated in the court filing: «Just because I am photographed in or next to a certain vehicle, wearing an article of clothing, holding a product, sitting next to what appears to be large sums of money or modeling expensive pieces of jewelry does not mean that I own everything in those photos,» he wrote.

When writing your direct mail sales piece, be sure to include and pay particular attention to these seven parts of your letter.

The piece focuses specifically on informal negotiations at work — those common but less written about moments when it's up to you to secure the credit or influence you deserve, or to get what you want from a reluctant supervisor or colleague.

As I alluded to in a piece I wrote when he stepped down from the Apple board of directors in 2014, Bill Campbell was a complicated man who moved fluidly inside grey zones.

When Dalton and Kaye wrote that appraisal in 1977, punk and disco were already making the Dead, one of the few surviving institutions of 1960s West Coast hippie culture, look like a museum piece.

Or when the press writes a trash piece about your company like how Gawker ripped Helena apart.

I first used that phrase (which I have since grown to detest) back in 2009 when I determined that the TSX Venture Exchange at 737 was quite cheap relative to its 2006 high at 3,300 so I wrote one of my first pieces for Streetwise Reports entitled «Sell in May and Make Some Hay» after which the TSXV peaked at 2,400.

The chart below is a short - term chart but you have seen the one I provided when I wrote the initial piece on the GTSR last week.

I'd been chewing on the first two chapters of Proverbs for a few weeks before I began writing this piece, and when I reached this line again, it hit me like a ton of bricks: The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.

This piece is obviously intended to stir up disgust with Christian pastors, and you can see it's working when you read people's responses written on this page.

The latest piece of research into the neglected area of covert political literature in early modern England, Greg Walker's impressive Writing Under Tyranny, identifies the moment in 1534 when the humanist genre of «counsel to princes» was forced to adopt coded terms which, in my view, reached their most sophisticated form in the repressive 1590s.

That bullshit might have worked when mankind was living in caves and a couple of thousand years ago when some desert dwellers wrote a crappy piece of fiction now called The Babble, but we now know better on many, many fronts.

When, in February, I wrote a piece about Anna Foa's research in my Catholic Herald blog, I added that I was still mystified by the hardening of Jewish opinion against Pius XII in the aftermath of Hochhuth's play Der Stellvertreter, which had depicted him virtually as a Nazi collaborator, given that the universal feeling expressed by Jews immediately after the war was one of gratitude and warmth towards Pope Pius.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

I still get emails from people who have discovered my Newtape Letters published in First Things, pieces that played off C.S. Lewis» famous Screwtape Letters, asking me when I will write more.

I encountered this blogger over a year ago when a friend sent me a piece she wrote condemning Joss Whedon's Firefly for being anti-feminist and anti-woman (say it with me: «WHAT?»).

Just when it looked like the storm had blown over, Pete Enns wrote an excellent piece for the Huffington Post in which he asks, Does God talk to us through fiction?

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

The Scribd note was an incredibly well - written piece of PR, but sometimes writers forget that when you know what to look for you can spot the sleight of hand a mile away.

When I was in college, I wrote a newspaper piece about cursing.

When Marcus Aurelius reflects on the eternal reason that has ordered things, there is a frosty chill about his words which you rarely find in a Jewish, and never in a Christian piece of religious writing.

As I observed earlier this year in a speculative piece on the Westminster succession (one of those runners and riders articles so beloved of the editorial mind) written for The Catholic World Report, «When Vincent Nichols went to Birmingham, it was considered a «liberal» appointment.

I also wrote a piece for the CNN Belief Blog about how, when it comes to church, many millennials desire a change in substance, not just style.

Dodd was a long supporter of the Book of Common prayer, the Anglican book with daily gospel readings and prayers, describing it when he was 89 as «a wonderful piece of literature, beautifully - written and based on fact.»

Here he writes, in connection with the question of reconstructing authentic teaching of Jesus, «we have reasonably secure ground under our feet only in one particular instance, namely, when there is some way of showing that a piece of tradition has not been derived from Judaism and may not be ascribed to early Christianity, and this is particularly the case when Jewish Christianity has regarded this tradition as too bold and has toned it down or modified it in some way».