Sentences with phrase «where snark»

He dreamed that he stood in a shadowy Court, Where the Snark, with a glass in its eye, Dressed in gown, bands, and wig, was defending a pig On the charge of deserting its sty.

He dreamed that he stood in a shadowy Court, Where the Snark, with a glass in its eye, Dressed in gown, bands, and wig, was defending a pig On

The practice of science has built up a number of mechanisms to try and ensure that arguments get dealt with constructively, and a big part of that is through the peer - reviewed literature where i's can be dotted, t's can be crossed, and where the snark gets put aside.

Following the guide, players will quickly reach a point where Snark writes: «Ride the dinosaur to Moskva.»

I've heard horror stories, so vet your Beta Readers carefully, especially if you meet online in a big, loosely - moderated place like Goodreads, where snark abounds.

We hope you've already met her, but in case you haven't, we'd like to introduce you to one of our major online girl crushes — Betches — a site where snark reigns supreme and the writers unapologetically share everything you're too afraid (or uncomfortable) to say out loud.

Not exact matches

Eli Ben - Sasson, Zcash founding scientist and zk - SNARKs co-inventor: It's like a magical restaurant bill where the items are blanked out but the restaurant can't cheat you, even if you can't see the individual sums.

Snark, but really, your comment cracked me up as justification for why Elicia just happened to plonk down where she did.

People in the climate research community resisted doing this for years, believing that they were only involved in a scientific debate, where, after much back and forth, and a fair amount of snark, reality would eventually win out.

They hunted till darkness came on, but they found Not a button, or feather, or mark, By which they could tell that they stood on the ground Where the Baker had met with the Snark.

People in the climate research community resisted doing this for years, believing that they were only involved in a scientific debate, where, after much back and forth, and a fair amount of snark, reality would eventually win out.

Tom Fuller's whining abut the «snark» and «dismissal» that met his attempts to peddle ExxonMobil - scripted pseudoscience and outright lies in a forum where people know better is as hypocritical as his so - called «journalism» is phony.

I would recommend adopting a more civil approach or better yet take it off - blog where you will not be tempted to look for «pretty» snark points for the cause.

Often it is claimed that this is because they're running away, but it's my experience that it's normally because the snark has got to the point where further discussion would not be constructive.

I began the published process of attempting to make sense of the Canadian jurisprudence in an article where the subtitle was «The Hunting of the Causative Snark».

zk - SNARK (Zero - Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge) is a proof structure where sender and receiver both can see the content of the transaction, while the network validates it without the need to reveal information.

Zcash works on Zero - Knowledge proofs, or zk - SNARK, where only sender and receiver can see the transaction on the blockchain.

I'm obviously snarking a bit, and it is worth noting that notoriety clearly plays a role in these survey results (look no further than spot 99, where the Harvey Weinstein company makes its debut in the list).