Sentences with phrase «where email recipients»
There's a link where email recipients are urged to show their support for the governor's free tuition proposal — a handy way to collect supporters» names for future contact (and perhaps fundraising appeals as the 2018 re-election campaign gears up).
http://www.nystateofpolitics.com/ Not exact matches
Email services are also often white - listed, where if you mass mail from your own email address it may get put directly into the recipients spam email foEmail services are also often white - listed, where if you mass mail from your own email address it may get put directly into the recipients spam email foemail address it may get put directly into the recipients spam email foemail folder.
The quick win was to differentiate emails where I'm the sole recipient from other messages.
A second filter highlighted every email where I was the sole recipient.
User goes to the SendBitcoin.mx site and chooses how much to send, provides sender email and recipient name and phone number, then QR code is displayed where bitcoins to be sent.
Gmail can now tell senders when a recipient opens an email — and even reveal where they were.
Name of donor: Amount donated: Transacting bank: Transaction number: Date and time of internet / ATM transfer: Name of recipient of charity gift (where applicable): Email address of recipient of charity gift (where applicable):
I don't remember which email it was, but there is one where the writer put his user name and password in the email so the recipient could access some data.
But where the really interesting story lies, is in two of the recipients of the Singer email who share an uncannily similar history.
Recipients must log in to the site with their email credentials to verify their identity, where they can then read the message and reply.
The Committee then listed six different situations where lawyers might consider a more secure communication method than email, including when: 1) communicating highly sensitive or confidential information via email or unencrypted email connections, 2) sending an email to or from an account that the email sender or recipient shares with others, 3) sending an email to a client when it is possible that a third person (such as a spouse in a divorce case) knows the password to the email account, or to an individual client at that client's work email account, especially if the email relates to a client's employment dispute with his employer 4) sending an email from a public computer or a borrowed computer or where the lawyer knows that the emails may be read on a public or borrowed computer or on an unsecure network, 5) sending an email if the lawyer knows that the recipient may access it on devices that are potentially accessible to third persons or are not protected by a password, or 6) sending an email if the lawyer is concerned that the NSA or other law enforcement agency may read the email, with or without a warrant.
This is in stark contrast to the first fine issued under CASL back in March, where Quebec - based corporate training company Compu - Finder was fined $ 1.1 million for emailing consumers without their consent and did not properly allow recipients to unsubscribe from the mailings.
If Lawyer A correctly addressed and sent emails that were then printed off by the intended recipient (Client A or Expert A) and left inadvertently in a place (say a law library) where they were discovered by the opposing party or its allies, Lawyer A would still want no doubt in the opposing party's mind that privilege remained intact.
The recipient gets an email notification and a link to click that takes them back to the WeTranfer site, where there's a download button.
Where an investigator for a regulatory body sends emails to two complainants who have alleged fraud against a member, the investigator may be protected from a claim for «defamation» arising from the content of his emails (e.g., where he confirms to the recipients that the body is prosecuting the member for professional [mis] conduct for the fact that he recklessly [carried out certain conduct]»), based on the defence of «absolute privilege&raWhere an investigator for a regulatory body sends emails to two complainants who have alleged fraud against a member, the investigator may be protected from a claim for «defamation» arising from the content of his emails (e.g., where he confirms to the recipients that the body is prosecuting the member for professional [mis] conduct for the fact that he recklessly [carried out certain conduct]»), based on the defence of «absolute privilege&rawhere he confirms to the recipients that the body is prosecuting the member for professional [mis] conduct for the fact that he recklessly [carried out certain conduct]»), based on the defence of «absolute privilege».
Recipients receive a link to a trusted Office 365 webpage where they can choose to receive a one - time passcode or re-authenticate with a trusted provider before viewing the email.
This means that you should know the proper form of address to use for the email's recipient, the appropriate tone, language, and structure to employ, and where to provide your contact information.