Sentences with phrase «where facts and evidence»

Not exact matches

ie: gravity... So, where is the evidence, and facts for intelligent design?

Once you get through the deception and their crazy no - fact doctrine based on book where it's history has been proven false due to the lack of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leave.

Which facts do you disagree with, what evidence do you have to support your contentions and where did I claim to be superior to anyone?

Evidence of the fact that union differentiates is to be seen all round us — in the bodies of all higher forms of life, in which the cells become almost infinitely complicated according to the variety of tasks they have to perform; in animal associations, where the individual «polymerises» itself, one might say, according to the function it is called upon to fulfil; in human societies, where the growth of specialization becomes ever more intense; and in the field of personal relationships, where friends and lovers can only discover all that is in their minds and hearts by communicating them to one another.

If you did acknowledge the evidence and where it points, you would then be faced with the fact that you are a sinner and accountable to this most Holy God and are now going to die.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

The big bang has evidence and make's sense, it's a fact that the universe is expanding therefore logically it had a point where this expansion begun and the evidence suggests so.

Take the money away from the public schools where children will be taught real science and that a «theory» is very close to a proven fact because it is supported by the preponderance of the evidence.

As the battle over genetically engineered food and the use of chemical fertilizers rages on, many people are choosing to opt for organic food where possible, to avoid the risk, despite the fact that there is no significant evidence to date suggesting GM foods are dangerous.

Whilst Marca gave no facts or structured evidence on the events, they pointed to where the relationship between Mourinho and Perez had broken down and even took a guess at naming Mourinho's successor (Joachim Low or Carlo Ancelotti), but in all honesty their knowledge is likely to be greater than ours.

The OB / GYN and CNM's in America are overburdened by patient loads, (According to Amnesty International there are 9.6 OB / GYN's and 0.4 CNM's available per every 1,000 births) having better trained CPM's seems like a nice solution for that problem, in fact why not have them work collaboratively with OB / GYN's, maybe we can all work together to find a common ground where evidenced based practice take place in the hospital to support physiologic birth, since the lack of such practice is what turns many women away looking for alternative choices.

In fact, I vehemently wish more paediatric nurses would undertake the qualification, since paediatrics is the one area where the Baby Friendly Initiative staff training has not been universally embedded, and some skilled, evidence based support is sorely needed.

Again most analysts and academics know that if anyone wanted to demonstrate the strange hypothesis that multiple and widely divergent exchange rates do not affect foreign investment, he could cite the evidence of more recent years, but that obviously not being consistent with the facts, our economist then went over two decades back to 1994 to cite an exception, a single investment in an environment of otherwise grossly low investment, in a sector where people invest even in times of war, to justify a faulty hypothesis!

Science is not a debate society where sophistry is more important than facts and evidence.

This is thinking where you look at what the actual facts are and the actual evidence is.

«The goal of this project is to help build consensus around a shared set of facts about gun policy by demonstrating where scientific evidence is accumulating,» said Andrew Morral, the project's leader and a behavioral scientist at RAND, a nonprofit research organization.

But regardless of whether you're getting tired or not, you have been using your fat - burning metabolism very very much (as evidenced by the time spent training), so it is not just important to take those two days of rest, but in fact critical to your development, since as I mentioned above, it is during rest and not training where growth actually happens.

In fact, it is evidence of sharper imperfections where the suspension tends to thud through them and you can hear it inside the cabin.

A fact that is evidenced as soon as you enter the capital of Colombo where dozens of high - rise projects, including big - name hotels and condominiums bearing names such as Grand Hyatt and Shangri - la, are being constructed, along with the Chinese - financed Colombo Lotus Tower, a 1,150 - foot landmark tower scheduled to open in late 2017 that will be South Asia's tallest structure (when it is complete it will be almost as tall as the Empire State Building).

What's worse, once a rumour ends up online, the endless game of Chinese Whispers or Telephone kicks in, where instead of following a story back to the source and getting the facts, an endless stream of sites will post each other's take until the very last one is saying something completely unsupported by the evidence.

Nesbitt's show arrives at a time where our society, the media, and government aim to establish a concrete line between fact and opinion, history and myth, evidence and conspiracy theory.

This is where the danger of circular reasoning comes in, because so many have become convinced that AGW is a fact proven ahead of time by «the physics» that they tend to see any evidence that might be construed as consistent with «the physics» as evidence that AGW is in fact real, and not only real but significant, and moreover dangerous.

[M] ore important than any single study or report, the members of this institution embody what is so necessary for us to continue our scientific advance and to maintain our cutting - edge, and that's restless curiosity and boundless hope, but also a fidelity to facts and truth, and a willingness to follow where the evidence leads....

And more important than any single study or report, the members of this institution embody what is so necessary for us to continue our scientific advance and to maintain our cutting - edge, and that's restless curiosity and boundless hope, but also a fidelity to facts and truth, and a willingness to follow where the evidence leaAnd more important than any single study or report, the members of this institution embody what is so necessary for us to continue our scientific advance and to maintain our cutting - edge, and that's restless curiosity and boundless hope, but also a fidelity to facts and truth, and a willingness to follow where the evidence leaand to maintain our cutting - edge, and that's restless curiosity and boundless hope, but also a fidelity to facts and truth, and a willingness to follow where the evidence leaand that's restless curiosity and boundless hope, but also a fidelity to facts and truth, and a willingness to follow where the evidence leaand boundless hope, but also a fidelity to facts and truth, and a willingness to follow where the evidence leaand truth, and a willingness to follow where the evidence leaand a willingness to follow where the evidence leads.

Likewise, when I cite evidence like «Debunking the Reagan Myth,» Paul Krugman, 21 January 2008, where Krugman points out that the economic «boom» of the 80s went mostly to the rich and left the middle class no better off than they had been under Carter, Republicans fanatically deny these documented facts, dismissing the charts of income growth for the mile class as «lying liberal statistics.»

Far and above all the other so - called evidence used in attempts to show that a sinister industry plot exists is what I term the core evidence: the set of leaked memos from way back in 1991 — supposedly from the Western Fuels Association's «Information Council for the Environment» (ICE) public relations campaign — containing the alleged strategy to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» where the targeted audience was «older, less educated males» and «younger, lower income women.»

As where Marcott et al went wrong as climate scientists, when they used paleoclimate data of long millenia time scales in natural variability, with the short decadal time scale (weather) in natural variability and claim to predict the future of where the pendulum of climatology will be in the future, when actually showing that they are confused, what they are representing as evidence of the future climate is in fact their total misunderstanding of climatology and the complex chaotic circumstances that influence the real world.

Fan, could you direct us to where the correct distribution for cloud nucleation germs has been derived, and the evidence presented that it is in fact an accurate model.

According to the judge «virtually all the evidence» pointed in favour of C's contention of Kington: although the fact that his mother (with whom the deceased had, in the last years of his life, at best a tangential relationship) would face difficulties in travelling the 50 miles from Worcester to Kington was «a weighty factor», it was outweighed by the fact that the deceased had made his home for most of the last eight years of his life in Kington and that was also where his brother, with whom he was close, and his fiancée lived, as well as where his father wished him to be buried.

For example, a United States court held that the mere fact that the tribunal President and the counsel of one of the parties both served on the same board of directors and were members of the same organization was insufficient to justify a refusal, where the party bringing the challenge had provided no evidence that they had otherwise communicated with each other.889 A Hong Kong court has equally affirmed this high burden of proof, finding that the party opposing enforcement had failed to prove its allegation that the tribunal's deliberations had been affected by the alleged bias of one member.890

It covers confidential communications between a lawyer and his or her client, or a lawyer or client and a third party (such as a witness of fact, an expert witness or a consultant) where the dominant purpose is advising on, or obtaining evidence in relation to, actual or contemplated litigation.

Where adjournments are required for further expert or medical evidence to arrive or be obtained, then it should be for the judge to determine what is right, just and equitable in relation to the facts and circumstances of the particular case before them.

The principle in R v Sussex Justices [1924] 1 KB 256, [1923] All ER Rep 233 — justice must not only be done but must manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done — requires that, even where a tribunal shows no actual evidence of bias, it must also satisfy the «apparent bias test» in Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 676 [2002] 2 AC, para 103 «whether the fair minded and informed observer, having considered the facts conclude that there was a real possibility that the tribunal was biased».

Despite the Court of Appeal's decision, the Court of Superior Justice has overturned a decision on the basis of the trial Judge's use and reliance on Google Maps — in R v Ghaleenovee, 2015 ONSC 1707, the Court referred to Calvert but concluded that where the facts are disputable, and the evidence produced by Google Maps is not put the accused or witnesses, relying on Google Maps «compromises the appearance of fairness».

If, however, you were convicted, and the Court found that you knew that the victim hadn't died at the time of trial, but you did not raise the fact that the victim wasn't dead, it isn't clear if you could have the original conviction vacated because it was a fair trial and you knew evidence sufficient to get yourself acquitted (which you may have refrained from presenting to avoid conviction on a lesser charge like kidnapping or aggravated assault), and the status of an «actual innocence» grounds for vacating a conviction after trial is hotly disputed, conservatives like the late Justice Scalia generally say «no», liberals generally say «yes», moderates like to say «yes» but make it almost impossible to establish except in rare cases like one where a live person walks in when there was a murder conviction for killing that actually living person.

Much has been written about the potential dangers of opinion evidence contaminating the fact finding process, and this commentary generally emerges in the civil litigation or criminal law context where the issues are typically narrow and findings of fact often relate only to a single individual.

In other words, where causation is supported by the fact that an injury appeared or worsened after the accident, there should be close scrutiny of all the evidence available and the inference that causation is satisfied should not be drawn from the temporal relationship.

On the one hand, it allows judges freedom from many of the oft - restrictive rules of evidence that govern the trial itself, giving them the flexibility to take into account aspects of the individual accused's circumstances and history, often in favor of leniency within the very broad statutory ranges where the facts urge it.

Iannone stands for the proposition that the plaintiff has the burden of leading evidence of past wage loss and that it will be a difficult burden to discharge where there is no confirmatory evidence, such as income tax returns, to establish that the amount claimed would, in fact, have been earned.

Where there is a dispute about any fact the court shall receive evidence under s. 724 (3)(a) and the prosecutor must establish any aggravating fact beyond a reasonable doubt under s. 724 (3)(e).

Family Law Arbitration is a process where a third - party neutral expert receives the facts, the evidence, and the legal argument in advance, as much or as little as you agree to submit; has a unique understanding of the law; and then conducts an oral hearing to let the parties and / or their counsel make oral submissions, and cross-examine witnesses, if they wish.

Courts have authority to consider new evidence of actual innocence without regard to the statutory one - year limitation period for newly discovered evidence, and that the standard for granting a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence should not be a strict «outcome - determinative» test, at least where the state relied at trial upon facts that turned out to be false.

One way to organize the evidence at trial is by preparing a table of facts and evidence where each fact that needs to be proven is listed along with the evidence (oral, documentary etc.) that would prove that fact.

This is a process where both the plaintiff (you) and the defendant (the party at fault) disclose all the evidence about the accident to each other to help clarify the facts of the case.

In any subsequent civil proceedings, the fact of a conviction will be admissible in evidence for the purpose of proving, where relevant, that the convicted person committed the offence, and the information, complaint, indictment or charge - sheet on which the person in question was convicted are admissible for the purpose of identifying the facts on which the conviction is based.

If that fresh evidence had existed at the time of Ms. Oakes» trial, and was presented to the jurors, we conclude that there is a reasonable possibility that the jury would have found that the admitted inconsistencies, lies and self - interest in Ms. Scott's testimony left them a reasonable doubt that her identification of Ms. Oakes as the murderer was reliable... [D] eference to the decision of the trier of fact can not play a significant role where that trier of fact was not in possession of critical information when it decided to convict.»

United States First Circuit, 10/11/2010 US v. Brown Defendant's conviction for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although the district court's factual findings and the inferences made from those findings, which formed the basis of its conclusion that reasonable suspicion existed to stop a car, are not compelled by the record or by the facts, both are nonetheless reasonable and therefore pass constitutional muster; 2) the affirmance of the district court's finding that the officers had reasonable suspicion to stop the car forecloses the need to address defendant's challenge to the district court's alternate conclusion that the car was not seized when the officers first approached; and 3) there was no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence without an evidentiary hearing.

Note that, except where expert evidence is needed, the focus is on facts and not opinions.

the Court held that while: «practice guidelines» may be generally respected and therefore relevant considerations in the Court's assessment of the standard of care, they are not intended to, and do not determine the legal standard of care that the Court will impose on a medical professional, especially where there is expert opinion evidence on the standard of care with reference to the facts of the particular case.

In fact, there is evidence that where ABS have been there has been little impact on providing great access to the most under - serviced areas of law such as family and criminal matters.