Sentences with phrase «where family law disputes»

Not exact matches

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

The first is in contested disputes between parents in family law cases where the interests of the child or children are impacted.

The savvy Chinese Foreign Family Judgment Enforcement Lawyers at MacLean Family Law also handle multi-million dollar cases where BC courts need to determine whether BC should take jurisdiction or let some other country's legal system decide family disputes between spouses who have spread their wealth and ventures across many continents and counFamily Judgment Enforcement Lawyers at MacLean Family Law also handle multi-million dollar cases where BC courts need to determine whether BC should take jurisdiction or let some other country's legal system decide family disputes between spouses who have spread their wealth and ventures across many continents and counFamily Law also handle multi-million dollar cases where BC courts need to determine whether BC should take jurisdiction or let some other country's legal system decide family disputes between spouses who have spread their wealth and ventures across many continents and counfamily disputes between spouses who have spread their wealth and ventures across many continents and countries.

The interdisciplinary collaborative family law process is a private form of dispute resolution where parties retain settlement - only counsel and utilize the services of neutral financial and / or mental health professionals.

Generally, in my years of specialising in the family laws, interpretations or opinions on Marriage Law are always being enacted by the legislative organs or the supreme court to settle the problem, where current law is not qualified to settle the dispuLaw are always being enacted by the legislative organs or the supreme court to settle the problem, where current law is not qualified to settle the dispulaw is not qualified to settle the dispute.

the conclusion of the trial, and the expiry of the appeal period, does not signal the end of litigation, as family law disputes may continue into the indefinite future where support and children are at issue;

Family mediation is a voluntary method of dispute resolution where a neutral third party can help parties resolve issues arising out of their family law mFamily mediation is a voluntary method of dispute resolution where a neutral third party can help parties resolve issues arising out of their family law mfamily law matter.

Stu Webb is known as the father of collaborative family law, a non-adversarial process where the spouses» attorneys agree to focus solely on out - of - court dispute resolution.

The Act creates a framework for collaborative family law, which is a private form of dispute resolution where attorneys focus solely on helping clients reach an out - of - court agreement.

Mediation is a voluntary way of resolving disputes where a trained mediator helps parties to reach an agreement about family law matters such as

Arbitration is a process where each spouse tells his or her side of a family law dispute to an arbitrator and asks for a specific decision.

Mediation is a voluntary way of resolving disputes where a trained mediator helps parties to reach an agreement about family law matters such as spousal support, the division of property, custody of and access to the children, child support or any other family - related issues.

The same research has shown the benefits of alternate dispute resolution models such as collaborative divorce and family law mediation as preferable and appropriate dispute solutions for families, especially where children involved.

Collaborative Law is an informal but structured process where the parties, through a series of meetings with their registered collaborative family law lawyers, work together to attempt to resolve their family law dispuLaw is an informal but structured process where the parties, through a series of meetings with their registered collaborative family law lawyers, work together to attempt to resolve their family law dispulaw lawyers, work together to attempt to resolve their family law dispulaw dispute.

If you don't understand the Rules, including what forms they require you to fill out, as well as when, where and how to serve and file them, you could be running around in circles instead of moving toward resolving your family law dispute.

We previously blogged about a contentious child support and spousal support dispute, in which an Indigenous father argued that band law should apply in lieu of Ontario family law where disputes involved Indigenous families.

Miss Fearn joins from McIntosh McTaggart, where she focussed on the constructive resolution of family law disputes for more than five years.

The decision issued by B.C. Supreme Court Justice Hope Hyslop last week is the latest in an increasing number of family law disputes where one of the parents has proposed using online software such as Skype when seeking to move with their children a great distance from their former spouse.

Child dispute conferences are also held in general family law matters, but unlike Hague matters where the parents have to agree to hold the conference, in general family law matters, conferences are ordered by the Court.

Michelle also interned with Bill Eddy at the National Conflict Resolution Center, in San Diego, where she developed conflict resolution skills and techniques for handling high conflict family law disputes.

Adam B. Cordover is managing attorney of Family Diplomacy: A Collaborative Law Firm where he practices exclusively in out - of - court dispute resolution.

Collaborative family law is a form of private dispute resolution where the parties agree that they will not let important decisions concerning their children be decided by a judge; rather, they will meet in a series of meetings to form their own parenting plan.

FAMILY LAW — APPEAL — INTERIM PARENTING — Where there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismFAMILY LAW — APPEAL — INTERIM PARENTING — Where there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismissLAW — APPEAL — INTERIM PARENTING — Where there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismiWhere there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismFamily Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismissLaw Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismiWhere it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismiWhere the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismiwhere the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismiWhere there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismissed.

Family law experts have backed the charity saying it's time for a step change to increase take up of alternative dispute resolution without recall to court in all cases where kids are involved.

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal ruling in a custody dispute where the father is a police officer could have a widespread impact on a number of other family law cases, Toronto family lawyer Christine Marchetti tells The Lawyer's Daily.

During law school, Michelle interned with Bill Eddy at the National Conflict Resolution Center, in San Diego, where she developed conflict resolution skills and techniques for handling high conflict family law disputes.

Consider, too, our website's acclaimed Frequently Asked Questions and Myths resources, where we answer other questions, and debunk commonly held misunderstandings − regarding Colorado divorce laws, court procedures and alternative dispute resolution alternatives, such as family mediation.

The parties agree to insulate their children from involvement in the family law disputes and agree to attend the A.C.T. Program (Acting for Children Through Transition) or similar parenting education program in a county where a program is available.

Also consider our website's acclaimed Frequently Asked Questions and Myths resources, where we answer other questions, and debunk commonly held misunderstandings − regarding Colorado divorce laws, court procedures and alternative dispute resolution alternatives including family mediation.

Also consider our website's acclaimed Frequently Asked Questions and Myths resources, where we answer other questions, and debunk commonly held misunderstandings − regarding Colorado divorce laws, court procedures and alternative dispute resolution alternatives, such as family mediation.

The law formalized what many courts had been doing in family law for years, which was appointing parenting coordinators or domestic relations decision makers in cases where the couples needed a third party to help navigate their dispute.

Collaborative Family Law and mediation are both forms of alternative dispute resolution, where parties attempt to resolve their differences without going to court.