Sentences with phrase «where grant applicants»

Not exact matches

In September, 20 of the applicants who best represent Grant's brand motto — «Stand Together» — will be flown to a special event in Scotland where they will be compete to be one of three finalists for the ambassador position.

Successful applicants will be granted membership in the MJFF LRRK2 Consortium, where they can share information, data and resources with other awardees of this and other MJFF LRRK2 - related efforts.

U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan picked 18 states and the District of Columbia to advance to the final round of the Race to the Top competition, where 10 to 15 grants totaling $ 3.4 billion will be awarded in September to applicants he believes have the boldest, most sustainable plans for education improvements.

Just would like to sum up with this question to your fellow editor about a curious number (pardon the pun): Under the «NO foreign transaction fee» Marriott Rewards Premier Visa section recommending it, it reads «Out of the three cards, this is the only one that's seriously worth considering for everyday use» despite it being «one of only two» cards listed side by side that have «annual fees» after the first year (with Barb's choice the second one that loves charging 2.5 % «foreign transaction fees» upfront / from the start on all foreign transactions rebating «afterwards» as «reward points» statement all of them «except on returns and cash advances» where the fees remain); however this article shows «more than three cards» (though granted the Amazon.ca Visa is unavailable now for the new applicant plus the missing Mogo Visa is a prepaid one and whereas this year's (2017) new $ 149 annual fee HSBC Premier World Elite MC is exclusively for their premier clients only) so which «three cards» in that statement there would we talking about here?

Just would like to sum up with this question to your fellow editor about a curious number (pardon the pun): Under the «NO foreign transaction fee» Marriott Rewards Premier Visa section recommending it, it reads «Out of the three cards, this is the only one that's seriously worth considering for everyday use» despite it being «one of only two» cards listed side by side that have «annual fees» after the first year (with Barb's choice the second one that loves charging 2.5 % «foreign transaction fees» upfront / from the start on all foreign transactions rebating «afterwards» as «reward points» statement all of them «except on returns and cash advances» where the fees remain); however this article shows «more than three cards» (though granted the Amazon.ca Visa is unavailable now for the new applicant plus the missing Mogo Visa is a prepaid one and whereas this year's (2017) new $ 149 annual fee HSBC Premier World Elite MC is exclusively for their premier clients only) so which «three cards» in that statement there would we talking about here?

The Foundation chose to limit the pool of applicants in this way to ensure that grant funds have a significant impact for institutions where funds for exhibition development and research are often more difficult to obtain.

The two were quite distinct, and Parliament clearly intended that s 24 (5) should only apply where a substantive application for the revocation of a placement order had been made — in other words, the applicant had got over the leave hurdle, and was making a substantive application which, consequent upon the grant of leave, would be likely to have been perceived as having a real prospect of success.

(6) Where a local authority refuse an application for a licence under section 37 of this Act or revoke or, otherwise than on the application of the holder, vary such a licence they shall state their grounds for doing so in writing to the applicant or, as the case may be, the holder of the licence; and the applicant or holder may appeal to a magistrates» court or, in Scotland, the sheriff, against the refusal, revocation or variation, and against any condition subject to which the licence is granted or any approval is given, not being a condition which the local authority are required to impose.

The general approach had to be that courts should be «exceedingly slow» to grant an injunction to restrain publication where the applicant had not satisfied the court that he would probably, or «more likely than not», succeed at trial (Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2004] UKHL 44).

Section 24 (5) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 — «where (a) an application for the revocation of a placement order has been made and has not been disposed of, and (b) the child is not placed for adoption by the authority, the child may not without the court's leave be placed for adoption under the order» — applies only where a substantive application for the revocation of a placement order has been made, ie the applicant, having got over the leave hurdle, is making a substantive application which, consequent upon the grant of leave, would be likely to have been perceived as having a real prospect of success.

Citing R. v Morgentaler, 1993 CanLII 158 (SCC), [1993] 1 SCR 462 at para. 1, the Court of Appeal confirmed intervenor status will be granted where an Applicant is «directly and significantly affected» by the outcome of the appeal and has «experience and a fresh perspective» on the subject of the appeal useful to its resolution (para. 14).

As injunction orders, where granted, place severe burdens or restrictions on parties subject to such orders, the burden to satisfy the court to make an order and the duties of the applicant are set high.

The English courts will also grant injunctive relief to restrain breaches of an arbitration agreement even where the applicant has no intention of commencing arbitration (AES - UST Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v UST - Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC [2013] UKSC 35).

«I would add to the list of factors set out in Pedersen the following considerations where the applicants were granted intervenor status below:

For example, the B.C. Health Professions Act stipulates that while a Registration Committee can impose limits or conditions (or refuse to grant registration) where an applicant has committed an indictable offence (i.e., something more serious than a summary conviction offence), the Registration Committee must be «satisfied that the nature of the offence or the circumstances under which it was committed give rise to concerns about the person's competence or fitness to practise the designated health profession.»

Where a trader seeks to publish in comparative advertising the results of tests of a rival trader's product, an important issue of freedom of expression is engaged and so the court will not grant an interim injunction to prevent such publication satisfied that it is likely that the applicant will succeed in obtaining a final injunction.

8.3.2 Where permission to cross-appeal is required, an application for permission may only be filed after permission to appeal has been granted to the original applicant for permission to appeal.

His Lordship found it very difficult to visualise a case where the grant of a freezing order, made without notice, could be said to be properly made in the absence of any formulation of the case for substantive relief that the applicant for the order intended to institute.

R (Bozzo) v Secretary of State for Welfare and Pensions [2010] EWHC 3571 (Admin) Human rights challenge to the eligibility rule for community care grants under the Social Fund — the need for a qualifying benefit — where applicant in need but in receipt of contributory - based incapacity benefit — whether incompatible with Article 14 and Article 1 of Protocol 1.

B.C.'s Supreme Court agreed with the government, but in October 2010, the case went to the B.C. Court of Appeal, where the original decision was overturned and the applicants were granted standing.

In many situations, the applicant is granted access to the database, and uses keyword filters to decide where their resume will be sent.

[20] The 1998 Provision of Financial Assistance by the Attorney - General in Native Title Cases guidelines did provide for a consideration of the applicant's financial circumstances «where appropriate» when determining whether assistance will be granted.

Where an applicant has been approved previously, or is currently approved, as a foster carer or prospective adopter, regulation 26 (1A) gives the fostering service undertaking the current assessment the power to request access to records about the applicant held by the fostering service or adoption agency which granted the approval (provided that the applicant consents).

More recently, the Government repeated history in granting mineral interests contrary to the NTA procedures under its «Ward Policy» where applicant companies who satisfied government officials that the tenement is on pastoral lease land that has been enclosed or improved.