So far our data do not show any evidence for rapid water contamination, as we do not see evidence of these diluted brines (type D water) associated with distance to natural gas wells (the Osborn 2011 paper) in wells
where higher methane concentrations were observed.
Not exact matches
No random sampling; authors appear to have simply cherry - picked water wells previously known to have
high concentrations of
methane, although they never actually mention in the report which wells they sampled or
where they're located: «Jackson said the study was indeed not random, but that was because they needed homeowners permission to test their water.»
This is about as far as one could get from
high levels (relative to most atmospheric
concentrations) of
methane over large areas
high in the atmosphere in the Arctic
where there is very little (direct) human activity.
«
Methane migration through the 1 - to 2 - km - thick geological formations that overlie the Marcellus and Utica shales is less likely as a mechanism for methane contamination than leaky well casings, but might be possible due to both the extensive fracture systems reported for these formations and the many older, uncased wells drilled and abandoned over the last century and a half in Pennsylvania and New York [where they did their study]... More research is needed across this and other regions to determine the mechanism (s) controlling the higher methane concentrations we observed.
Methane migration through the 1 - to 2 - km - thick geological formations that overlie the Marcellus and Utica shales is less likely as a mechanism for
methane contamination than leaky well casings, but might be possible due to both the extensive fracture systems reported for these formations and the many older, uncased wells drilled and abandoned over the last century and a half in Pennsylvania and New York [where they did their study]... More research is needed across this and other regions to determine the mechanism (s) controlling the higher methane concentrations we observed.
methane contamination than leaky well casings, but might be possible due to both the extensive fracture systems reported for these formations and the many older, uncased wells drilled and abandoned over the last century and a half in Pennsylvania and New York [
where they did their study]... More research is needed across this and other regions to determine the mechanism (s) controlling the
higher methane concentrations we observed.
methane concentrations we observed.»
NATURALLY OCCURRING
METHANE CAPTURE — Methane emissions may occur from land areas where coal or other high concentrations of un-extracted fossil fuels are present underground, resulting in a naturally occurring source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emi
METHANE CAPTURE —
Methane emissions may occur from land areas where coal or other high concentrations of un-extracted fossil fuels are present underground, resulting in a naturally occurring source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emi
Methane emissions may occur from land areas
where coal or other
high concentrations of un-extracted fossil fuels are present underground, resulting in a naturally occurring source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Naturally Occurring
Methane Capture Carbon Offsets —
Methane emissions may occur from land areas
where coal or other
high concentrations of un-extracted fossil fuels are present underground, resulting in a naturally occurring source of GHG emissions.
There are probably «blooms» of methanotrophs
where the
concentrations are
high, and mixed populations of microbes of wildly varing composition across the
methane / oxygen / temperature gradients.