The majority differs from the dissenting view principally on the basis of the weight attached to legislative intention; it is no accident, say Kay and Pitchford LJJ, that the grant of draconian powers deemed to be necessary to combat terrorism is couched in a procedure
where judicial supervision is limited.
Not exact matches
Students in cities like Baltimore and Washington, D.C.,
where the special education systems have operated for long stretches under
judicial supervision, can go years with undiagnosed and untreated learning disabilities.
First, if effective
supervision by the courts is the rationale for the duty to give reasons, wouldn't a duty arise in any case
where the underlying decision is subject to
judicial review (which, nowadays, is more or less all decisions)?