Sentences with phrase «where land masses»
... to the point where land masses should be produced in centuries, not millenniums.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
«Then through out the 6,000 years of land shifting, which happens naturally, the land masses have broken apart and that is where we are at now.»
And in effect... the crusades occured, the war in Iraq (Bush quoted god to provoke Americans to jump on board to support his war), environmental uses of land, drilling oil in places where they should not, mass suicides, shootings claming go made them do it.
And what if new forms of mass occupations develop — around corporate «land grabs» for example — where thousands of poor people stay in protracted protest and a political standoff without sufficient health care and food.
He even analyzed the topography of the land to understand where the air masses being measured likely originated — and hence, show that two different locations were climatically similar.
A supercontinent last formed 300 million years ago, when all the land masses grouped together on the equator as Pangaea, centered about where West Africa is now.
These are the areas of seabed immediately surrounding a land mass, where the sea is relatively shallow compared to the open ocean beyond it.
Scientists said the fossils will help fill in important gaps about how dinosaurs evolved in Africa during a period when the continents had neared the end of their shift from a single giant land mass to where they are, more or less, today.
The land mass is small atop these underwater mountains where the white sandy beaches meets the crystal clear water.
It was also the week where at the very start of it, came the discovery of Mario Costume # 112, when not only was a Data miner able to make the discovery of Super Mario Land's Sky Pop plane, but also uploaded it as part of a level so the likes of the masses could see it and try out the costume in action.
Partly this has to do with changes in ocean circulation taking warmer water deeper and partly as the result of the southern hemisphere having less land mass and more ocean — where the ocean has a higher thermal inertia, meaning that it takes longer for those waters to warm.
There are significant horizontal currents even in the lowest layer but apart from places where these currents hit continental land masses there is no way to get much up or down currents.
They are underestimating the effect in the Arctic and in the northern hemisphere continental land masses where we all live!
In many arid parts of the world, desertification is a major issue, and advancing deserts and loss of formerly fertile lands can have a big impact on not just the local environment, but can also affect where and how people live in those areas, many times leading to mass migrations from the country to the cities.
The Unorganized Territory (where most wind development is targeted) comprises the majority of the state's land mass, but is home to just one percent of the population.
Contrast that to land where below surface mass has such a low thermal diffusivity as.to be inconsequential.
If it was a matter of choice, I think the nearer to sun is better than further from the sun, mainly because where continental land mass are currently located - we would get more arable land.
where does it say land «mass»?
That's where most of the land mass is anyway.
The scientific truth is that, while the wind blows, the Earth rotates and its land - masses are approximately where they are, the ocean circulation must remain much as it is now.
Grace satellite data during the period of «the pause» is pretty convincing to many experts who believe the data pretty clearly displayed exactly where the mass was displaced to as ENSO related wind shifts caused more moisture to fall over land versus ocean.
The largest changes were in the Northern Hemisphere, where there are more land masses and larger human populations than in the Southern Hemisphere.
In the final analysis we are arguing about a temperature record made by volunteers with little oversight over many generations on continents where a truly massive amount of land use change due to industrialization and agriculture and where said land mass is but a small fraction of the globe's surface one might wonder why we bother with it.
Winds quickly drive CO2 away from the sunny regions where it is being released so it is easy to envisage Henry's Law applying in a particular location but if the CO2 rich air is being constantly removed then more outgassing can then occur in the same region and it is not hard to envisage an accumulation of CO2 downwind or over land masses where the wind flow slows down.