Sentences with phrase «where less means»

Not exact matches

In the post-recession business landscape where good jobs continue to be hard to come by, more and more employees across all industries are working harder than ever, even if it means sleeping a lot less.

The sportswear brand has shown what it means by differentiated retail with its concept store in New York's SoHo neighborhood and the nearby 45 Grand, Nike's exclusive showroom and design studio where guests can get custom Presto X's in less than 90 minutes.

Breakthrough leaders are less concerned with people's personal loyalty to them and more concerned about building a place where everybody is loyal to the company first — even if that means disagreeing with the big cheese.

That means there's less than a year left for the two parties to come to an agreement or face a «cliff edge» scenario where ties between the U.K. and the EU are suddenly severed with no arrangement as to how to move forward outside WTO rules.

«One is a re-acceleration in daily active users, and two is an increase in the average revenue per user, particularly abroad, where the APRUs are always less than they are in the United States,» Meeks said, using an acronym meaning average revenue per user.

This means intentionally doing less marketing in places where your customers aren't, or when you don't have the ability to support a long - term effort, or if you are spreading your resources too thin.

«For the days where you don't feel 100 %, you should do something much less strenuous — a brisk walk, a slow jog, swimming, or a stretching session would be much more beneficial, and it would mean you're less likely to overtrain.»

This meant that less - important qualities like payout ratio where considered to be just as important as EPS growth.

They bring with them proven success (where unknowns carry a ton of question marks), familiarity with company culture and processes (which means less training) and a reminder to coworkers thinking about leaving that the grass isn't always greener on the other side.

And that means one has an advantageous situation where the business would have to do a lot wrong and become worth a lot less before the investment becomes worth less than one paid.

An active portfolio would almost certainly be less diversified than the ETF, which means that the same asset flows would have been directed to a smaller number of stocks where they would presumably have been even more disruptive.

Perhaps the right conclusion is that it's less crazy to replace founders when the outcome being driven to is an outright acquisition, where the mean value is lower than the total capital raised.

It is always true of Dasein that «I am it»; but in a discussion where what «be» means is precisely what is under question — above all when made grammatically finite in the first person (see SZ 24 = BT 46)-- this tells us much less than we might think.

This means that the seminary, the place where theological work is usually done, has also become less important.

Devotion to «diversity» doesn't mean having a faculty or student body with the ideological diversity of our country, a place where more or less half the population unjustly votes Republican.

Does he mean that in the present state of affairs, where the prospect of a confessional state is next to nil, we should prudently strive incrementally to achieve a lesser good, like a merely civil society, postponing the direct pursuit of a sacred public square and a confessional state until prudence dictates?

In a world where issues are ever more complicated, where ideas are ever more complex, and where politicians and teachers and preachers are less and less sure of themselves, we ask: what does it all mean?

On the other hand, God must so act in the interests of both the self and all others as thereby to establish the cosmic order of natural law that sets the optimal limits of all other action, where by «optimal limits» I mean limits such that, were they to be set otherwise than they are, the ratio between opportunities for good and risks of evil would be less rather than more favorable than it in fact is.

The ability to love implies, thirdly, that we risk our existence in a relationship where predestination, in the sense of determination by something less than person will, would destroy the meaning of love.

Perhps it hurts more if we have had a bad expereince fomr church because of wha tthe church is meant to stand for by way of loving God and others, where there is not that expectation elsewhere and we are either guarded or less guarded accordingly.

In any case, thoughtful people in these churches where the language of survival has been less urgent — and such thoughtful people are legion — are asking questions of meaning which show that they too are «bothered» and have to look at «what's ahead.»

My ordination means that my hometown church, where I first heard God speak to me, made my profession of faith, was baptized, and made my commitment to vocational Christian service, will not permit me even to speak to a Sunday school class, much less preach.

Finally, there is a tiny fraction (I would say less than 1 %) of uses where the term probably does refer to receiving eternal life, though even in these contexts, the actual meaning of the word is debatable.

O made this bread last night but as a lot of other people have stated below, after nearly 2 hours in the oven it was still raw I followed all the processes step by step and I would say the mixture was firm definitely not runny, so am really confused as t what has gone wrong, I even turned up the oven temperature to over 200 for the last half an hour as was getting a bit desperate............... perhaps ella you may be able to post a picture of the dough just before it goes in the oven so we can see what you mean by firm as that may be where it goes wrong OR should I just try with using less water?

Of course, like all doughs, it's a play between wet and dry ingredients and if your large eggs were actually on the small side (this happens to me ALL of the time, where I get all sorts of sizes in a supposedly «large» dozen) could have meant that less flour was needed.

A lot of almond milk also contains quite a lot of sugar, still less than cow's milk, meaning it contains less calories, but it's always better to go for an unsweetened, unflavoured version where possible.

This is particularly important in the frozen aisles where the products are obscured behind fogged up glass doors, and cold temperatures mean that consumers are likely to spend less time browsing.

Lycopene in tomatoes is another example where «no heat» means less nutrients.

Where's the pride people??? since when do we settle for 4th??? why are we settling for less??? Champions league qualification might mean the world to Everton and the spuds but for us it goes without saying.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

A Friday dedicated to dreary practice sessions which mean everyone is over-prepared for the race, or a Friday where you can go to the track for free, interact more with the teams and drivers and watch a Procar race, followed by a less predictable Grand Prix weekend?

This means you have less moments where you are gritting your teeth listening to the announcer

The length of the Indy 500 and characteristics of oval racing mean there's always a time where unexpected or lesser - known names find themselves at the front, and that was no different in 2017.

He's attempting to switch position, where he is untested, meaning he is less likely to be selected.

This very small change in brain size means there's less free room for the brain to move inside the skull, resulting in less damage from hits, where traditionally the brain would slosh around inside the skull.

Nonsense, what does longevity mean, World cup is the yardstick, where is Ronaldo dalima, how dare you rate Christiana Ronaldo over Dalima, that's inept, Why should Messi be above Maradonna, The quality of footballers now are even lesser than ever, all we have are two inches above average players in Messi and Ronando, remember Zidane time where we had Figo, ROnaldino, Seedorf, Maldini, Nedved, Crespo, Batistuta, Shevy.....

The exception is the keeper, where experience is crucial and the toll on the body is less, meaning that they can remain at the top of their game into their late thirties... and guess what.....

Arsene Wenger will move to a club where he would have much to spend and earn better meaning less headache.

This is important because it helps create a situation where dads (by which we mean the full diversity of men with a significant caring role in children's lives, including biological and other fathers and father - figures), as well as mums (in a similarly diverse sense), feel comfortable and valued — in the context of a culture which still privileges women as more naturally suited to caring, and more important as parents (and by extension, less important in other contexts, eg the workplace).

So despite living in an urban environment, I'm actually generally less concerned about break - ins than I am about other hazards because, 1) we are busy and despite our best efforts to move through the world mindfully, there have been instances where we have accidentally left something on, 2) we live in a side - by - side condo and more humans means more potential for hazards.

Sport is seen less as a means to better life than it is in the US, where the chase for college athletic scholarships has reshaped the youth sport landscape over the past generation.

Because your little one has developed the strength and mobility to roll onto her tummy, she's also developed the ability to sense trouble when she's sleeping — which means she's far less likely to become trapped in a position where her breathing is compromised.

This age (around 17) is where girls slow down drastically with their growth, and this can mean a weight gain as girls adjust to needing less calories, but usually the weight gain is over a longer period.

Now we are seeing many more students eating lunch, and less of the «school food sucks» complaints too, which reinforces my belief that half the time, «school food sucks» really means «the whole experience of getting a free lunch at school, where everyone then knows that you are poor, sucks.»

I mean we look around the room where you are and everyone is breastfeeding and so we forget those that in the State of California by the time you are three and four months out of delivery, very, you know, less than half of the population is actually breastfeeding.

SHELLY STEELY: Because once you put [inaudible] into something else and yeah it was just overwhelming for us in terms of cost and so we just you know I've heard from other people making your own food was better, fresher, less expensive and really not very time consuming so that was kind of where and in nutrition also you're now controlling the food I mean...

«One of the things we'd like to understand is where does this five years come from and more importantly, even if it is moved to five years, it's still substantially less than the rest of the nation which means that a New York survivor who is raped will still have less civil rights than his or her counterparts in the rest of the United States of America.»

It is worth noting that while people under age 65 in the U.S. live in a heavily market - dominated economy where poor employment outcomes mean poverty and a lack of access to health care, almost everyone over age 65 has most of their healthcare paid for by Medicare, (a FICA tax financed, single payer system that pays providers more or less the same rates as private insurance companies and has few cost controls), more than half of their nursing home costs paid by Medicaid, (which is stingy in how much it pays providers and moderately means tested), and receives enough of a guaranteed income from the combination of Social Security and SSI payments to keep the poverty rate for people age 65 +, (even if they have no retirement savings of their own), above the poverty line, regardless of the state of the local economy.

Others have warned that Britain's decision to act outside of any international consensus means that they will consider relocating to jurisdictions where there is less regulation.

With the benefit cap meaning that housing benefit will be capped at a point where for many who rely on it will have to move away, which means areas with relative affluence with sites of former counci estates, which are now being snapped up by yuppies or young professionals renting them will increase in an area — less likely to vote Labour than those who were on receipt of housing benefit.