Sentences with phrase «where much changes»

What's brought the question to mind is the situation where much changes — who has the «right» to make the changes, do they have to consult?

Not exact matches

So maybe that's an area where not much will change.»

«The internet and technology has changed so much of our lives, but moving was an area where that hadn't come about,» Eidson says.

But much of that has changed in the era of always - on social media, to the point where some wonder whether the traditional press corps has outlived its usefulness.

I would say probably the most — one of the areas that changed the most is that there was a much more of a hierarchical focus in companies as I was entering the business world than today where we see much more of a flat structure, a more egalitarian structure and the reality is that the employees of today are looking for that.

In addition to the rules - based approach, Mester also suggested the Fed not focus so much on short - term data changes in its economic projections, and tweaking those projections to link them to where each individual member believes the funds rate should be if those conditions come to fruition.

Actually, the changes aren't so much changes, as far as I can tell (again, without being able to check them out myself, yet), as they are a reorganization of where things are located.

ON THE VALUE OF SURROUNDING ONESELF WITH TALENTED PEOPLE If you're in an environment where you're not learning as much as you think you should be, if you don't have the people around you who you think are going to inspire you to do the best work that you can, then think about changing something.

Capital raise after capital raise obviously signals an intense cash burn rate, but if Tesla is going to change the world and push electric cars to a point where they constitute more than 1 % of global auto sales, chilling out on the spending and letting the balance sheet take a breather doesn't make much sense.

Along with these kinds of changes, and the growing popularity of autonomous driving, the consistent design of services and experiences from within the car and beyond will become much more important to car manufacturers — to a point where it will drive brand identity, said Nils Uellendahl, the Shanghai - based design director of BMW Group's (bmwyy) global creative consultancy Designworks.

But one reason our bank knows it's not true is because we've been able to spend so much time educating the people connected with our account about what's really going on and where the opportunities lie for our company, regardless of the downturn in the economy or changes in our industry,» he says.

The point, emphasized Information reporter Amir Efrati, was to zero in on Series A and seed funding, where he said he didn't expect to see much of a change.

I think coming back to what your goals are — and saying we could see a 10 - 20 % market drop — if that doesn't change your day - to - day life, and the upside is much greater; I think that's where we have to come back to and focus on what it actually means to you to see some market volatility and if it really is a problem.

Given that nothing else has changed very much, it makes sense that Intelsat's stock, too, would begin gradually drifting back to where it was before earnings were released — and maybe even a bit lower.

And much of the country's so - called war on pollution is centred on coal where the change in direction is just as startling.

The entry of Amazon and its partners adds to the upheaval in an industry where much is changing, from government programs after the overhaul of the tax law to the uncertain future of the Affordable Care Act.

It's reaching a point where we don't have much else to say and are just waiting for a change of scenery.

And it just goes to show a lot of people's edge, and in his case, I think, for example, is that is his ability to stick to his system, you know, much like you talk about in blackjack where he says, «Look, this is what I do and realize there's gonna be times of underperformance,» and not changing his whole approach when markets are down or he's doing poorly.

Government bonds have typically been more sensitive to changes in U.S. interest rates, as they have a much higher proportion of foreign buyers and sellers from countries where local rates might be more stable or moving in the opposite direction.

In terms, I think of inflation and bond markets, it took six, seven, eight, maybe 10 years of high inflation in the 1970s before you had Paul Volcker brought in to say «enough is enough,» and then again whether it's led by American monetary policy but similar moves in Europe, obviously in the UK, a significant tightening of monetary policy because people got fed up with inflation and I don't think that we are kind of yet at the point where real wages have been suppressed so much by that irritation that inflation is always running ahead, life is becoming more expensive, so we need the central bank radically to change their policy.

The greatest threat is not from climate change but from the hubris to build so much in regions where we know hurricanes will continue to land.

What they're saying and what they argue is that the issue is that the demographics which are changing dramatically... You know the baby boomers aren't buying as much, the Millennial's don't have as much money, at least in the United States, but around the world even in China where we've had a dramatic reduction in the growth in population, we don't have the youth that's coming on in relationship with the accumulation of wealth that the previous generations have had.

My list hasn't changed much in the last two or three months but that's only because I tend to buy where the best values and yield are which is currently in many industrial and Canadian banking names.

In a week where much of the Internet was all atwitter about Mobilegeddon, Google's pre-announced algorithm change that will favor mobile - friendly sites in mobile search results, a potentially far more impactful announcement was much more of a surprise: Facebook is tweaking the News Feed algorithm.

Change is always scary when it is happening to someone you love very much and not knowing where it's all leading.

The fact of God indwelling us through His Holy Spirit is going to make a change in our lives and will have much relevance to everyday life so I don't know where you get the idea that «if we accept that the Kingdom is now a «spiritual» Kingdom only, then that leads to the situation where the Kingdom becomes a religious idea that has little relevance to everyday life, very interesting to theologians, pulpiteers and pew audiences, but no dynamic to transform people into action».

Much will have to be changed to allow this to happen, but there are already places within the traditionally secular psychotherapies where there is explicit or implicit recognition of the role of the transcendent values.

When we have done this, we shall be in a better position to understand how the idiom may continue to be used as an expression of our hope in the face of a fast - changing world where so much is uncertain.

Lisa: It wasn't so much policy changes, as it was conscious decisions on the parts of leaders of the time to submit themselves to the authority of the first peoples of their regions when making decisions about where their regional and national conferences were to be held.

«Now we'll spend that much on the whole recording and marketing of a record,» he says, reflecting on the massive changes that have taken place in the streaming era of pop music, where artists releasing music online can top the charts and traditionally powerhouse artist release albums unannounced, sometimes with little marketing.

Until i got to the place where i realised my identity is in Christ not in what i do and so i put him first that has radically changed my life and i am much closer to him than i ever was.May God bless you and show you what he wants you to do just trust him tell him that you cant do it thats important because the flesh wants to be able to do it in its own strength and that comes from our pride we must admit that without him we can do nothing.Let go of who you were so you can become who you are menat to be in Christ.regards brentnz

It stood before us; as much as we would let it, as a teacher and guide and as a reminder and rule, indicating when our lives together were at their very best and where they needed to change and improve.

The poster was saying that you should «stick with your current delusion» instead of CHANGING to islam where you might pine for 72 virgins and do something much more drastic and harmful than you would as a christian.

This is my every day dilemma, and not so much for lack of ideas, but for finding that tricky, elusive, ever - changing common ground where all picking eaters in the house can be satisfied.

Even if you're in a place where the weather doesn't change much, there's comfort in knowing that nature's cycles continue to pass through our lives no matter what else is going on.

After the months in the north — where I lived on rice and chicken, chickpeas, and okra, and quickly learned the Dari phrases for «please do not use so much oil» and «the cat is not allowed in the kitchen» — my eating habits had to change.

Changes include keeping text clear, formatting layouts and tables, and making sure links adequately describe where they go («click here» does not mean much in isolation).

In our 2015 survey we found that where you live can impact how much you pay at the supermarket, with those living in NT and WA paying a premium, and shoppers in the eastern states pocketing the most change from their weekly shop.

And when I say «I don't want him to change his game to much» Im saying that I don't want John changing his game to the point where he doesn't feel like he is being the player he wants to be.

Rodriguez's desire to cut his loan deal short may signal a change of times at Bayern Munich who are in a situation where the new manager for next season may have to convince the aforementioned players to stay with the club or see an exodus of much loved personnel.

Ivan where is the change you so much crave and talked about.

There's so much wrong with Arsenal if we were given chances to write about them it would take a year.What kind of mentality is this.Forgive me for the way I come out but what has to be said has to be said and the truth hurts.I do nt know if you guys are happy with what's going on but am not.We live in a world where those who speak the truth are hated very much and a world full of incomprehensible things.Its just sad.Things have to change from this year especially the mentality of this club.I just wan na see my club succeed and its bothering me a lot we just can not seem to do what is right.It's time average players are taken out of the club and what I mean by that is players who do nt want to improve.You already them lot.

For a playing style like that of Arsenal where Midfielders have so much freedom to go forward and change positions you cant say he cant score 10 - 12 goals a season if he shows the intent to do so.

I tell you from a footballing point of view scoring 8 goals you got have players that know where the goal posts are it takes energy and creativity to score 8 yes I agree vikings changed their players because their league is starting i think tomorrow so yes they were not a big team team but to say that Arsenal were not strong thats a bit to much and I say it again you need energy and creativity to score 8 I was very happy they did that Arsenal are well known for creating chances yesterday they converted them chances into Goals this should be the norm and I hope this will give them a lesson on how to win a game as they did nt dwell about with the ball it was goal after goal and that tells me that they went for the goals directly and I hope and wish the young guns all the best and to do well in the next season

We are at a point where something has to change and that is almost certainly the manager, much as it pains me to say it, wenger has done such a good job for the club, building a new stadium and keeping us in the top four.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Gazidis pointed out something last year «catalyst for changes» and he was blaming our poor infranstructre we have at Arsenal where a head coach / manager had so much power to do almost everything sorrounded with incompetence / yes man like Dick Law reporting to him and going out to close a deal or push it to a finishing line with fixed price set up by Wenger!

«And having listened to Steve Kerr in those coaching meetings that we are fortunate to sit in pregame, where he talks so eloquently about how much Steph changes an opponent defensive schemes, how much further out they're forced to contend, how that shape - shifts the defensive layout of the floor, it's incredible.»

i wouldn't say much has changed or this was our plan B, but the problem lies with consistency, we where at the top of the league this time last year and that one liverpool result ruined it.

If we start this season without either extending Sanchez's contract or selling and replacing him with a SUITABLE alternative (S) it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... if nothing is resolved and we lose him for free, then try to find a replacement in the much inflated marketplace, this would be typical of the half - baked decision - making that has plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams that don't develop or recruit enough talented young players tend to lose the plot from an organizational standpoint