Not exact matches
Cuomo's proposal seeks to limit the number of teachers who receive high ratings under the system, since the subjective
observations component is seen as an area
where administrators have the opportunity to inflate teachers»
scores.
Martha Keating, Labor Relations Consultant for the Rochester Teachers Association, says a new
scoring system is in place
where teachers can accumulate up to 100 points, «Never before has there been a prescribed rating that the
observation evaluation counts this much and the state tests count this much and if there was local testing it would cost this much, but the law imposed that on all of the districts in NY State.»
That said, in the hands of a twice exceptional experienced tester, subtest
scores combined with personal
observations will point to areas
where further evaluation might be needed to confirm or deny learning disabilities in a gifted child.
This is
where they will compile their
observation scores, their goals for improvement, and their ratings of individual competencies.
In Tennessee,
where student test
scores count for 35 percent of a teacher's evaluation, questions have been raised about the system's accuracy and reliability, with someteachers seeing inconsistencies between the
scores they receive on
observations and their value - added ratings.
The state has dispatched coaches to work with schools
where the
observation and test
scores don't line up.
Increasing the rigor of standards and, subsequently, the demand of tests, will likely increase the proportion of cases
where classroom
observation scores and student achievement results align to identify similar teachers as effective.
Skill
Scores Next in today's post, I will quantify the visual impression that «GCM - Q» outperformed HadGEM2 by using a skill
score statistic that is commonplace in the evaluation of forecasts, estimating the «skill» of a model from the sum of squares of the residuals from the proposed model as opposed to a base case, as expressed below
where obs is a vector of
observations and «model» and «base» are vectors of estimates.
Practitioners will be familiar with cases
where seemingly reduced medical involvement over the weekend has resulted in the significance of deteriorating MEWS
scores (clinical
observations) being missed.
I think any of us who've observed «personality test»
scores for the legal industry know
where lawyers sit on the continuum of cynicism (not that intuition and
observation weren't also worthy paths to the same conclusion).
Another way of looking at these data is by plotting each
observation against the previous
observation, as depicted in the state - space plots on the right side of Figure 1,
where the diagonal line depicts the autoregressive relation (based on the \ (\ phi \) parameter) underlying the
scores.