Sentences with phrase «where parties»

But carbon markets will need to function in a radically changed world, where all Parties have commitments towards a common 1.5...

In fact, the Harvard method suggests that you think of a negotiation as an event where the parties involved sit side - by - side and consider together a problem that needs to be solved by using the brainpower of all concerned, adversaries or not.

Sullivan scheduled a conference for later this month, where the parties will likely work out a briefing schedule.

Do you want to know where the parties stand on issues of interest to scientists?

The same article also pointed out that the governor's races are sometimes more responsive to the party's grassroots because, «unlike congressional races, where the parties» campaign committees have intervened in primaries, there's no national group that takes sides in choosing the nominee.»

Instead, we are left with a democracy where parties spent 162 % more money in the 50 most competitive seats than in the 50 least competitive.

Discussing the boundary vote Clegg, in an interview published on Thursday, said: «Clearly this is not something where the parties in the coalition government agree.

Five additional jury candidates were excluded by the judge, where the parties had disagreed.

But leaders of the Conservative Party and the Working Families Party are afraid that if the restriction is repealed, they will be raided, especially in small jurisdictions where those parties may have very small numbers of registrants.

The impact of these changes in multi-member constituencies where parties run several candidates will be a particularly interesting feature of election night.

To delve into where parties drew their support from it is necessary to look at the opinion polls.

The unanswered question is: Are we better off with our ideological parties, or were we better served by our former party system where both parties had a mix of liberals, conservatives and moderates?

By creating safe seats where parties (whether incumbent in the seat or not) do not bother to campaign, the system creates voters who consequently do not bother to vote.

Plus ideological battles are more interesting than a scrap over the centre ground where the parties have a lot in common.

Blair Horner of the New York Public Interest Research Group called it «an interesting approach where both parties have been at loggerheads for years» but said «there's definitely a possibility» that the proposal ended in another classic Albany impasse in which the Democrat - dominated Assembly and GOP - controlled Senate fail to agree on a bill that can make it to the governor's desk.

My colleagues Patrick Wintour and Nicholas Watt report on where the parties find themselves at this point in the small hours:

While the Tories spent somewhere in the region of # 3.5 million more than Labour, its revealing how and where the parties deployed their limited resources.

«Aware that the right of self - determination in international law is the legal right for a «people» that allows them to attain a certain degree of autonomy from a sovereign state through a legitimate political process, we strongly demand for a referendum to take place in a politically sane atmosphere where all parties will have a democratic voice over their future and the future of the nation.

This seems like a scenario where all parties win.

«The late submission of accounts is a serious matter and where parties have failed to meet the statutory deadline we will be imposing civil penalties.»

Many are not even sure where the parties stand.

Illinois's 11th District (R): This is a race where the parties see things very differently.

Ball told The Daily News that «It was just a heartfelt breakup where both parties jointly requested a «cooling off» period, and the entire matter was mutually dismissed.

Might there be a middle ground, somewhere between the two figures, where the parties» assessments of the fallout broadly coincide?

In New York, divorces are already largely private affairs, as state law automatically seals the case file, even where parties» names are listed.

Daniel Gitner, the attorney for defendant Peter Galbraith Kelly, wrote to federal Judge Valerie Caproni last week about a hallway - length exhibit about famous cases set up outside the courtroom where the parties expect the trial will be held.

Oldham East and Saddleworth is a three way marginal, between Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives, which makes for an even more interesting test of where the parties stand with the public.

(2) agreeing as a «compromise» to positions where both parties decide to agree to do something they had [both] promised not to (child benefit changes), and also where one party places little no weight on a pledge it suggested was a binding commitment (LD tuition fees; Cameron where there are NHS cuts).

DNS is used to mark where parties did not stand a candidate.

Where parties win votes at the next general election will matter as well as how many they win.

The question has been asked: is the court a service or a place where parties meet to settle their differences.

For more coverage of Vote 2010 - Vote 2010 — latest stories - Vote 2010: today's election barometer - Vote 2010: where the parties stand

If the current administration and Democratic Congress won't stand up against a corrupt system and even attempt reform, attempt structural change or pull us back from the last 3 decades where BOTH parties have moved firmly to the right, they're part of the problem.

... [T] aking it in this civil light, the law treats it as it does all other contracts; allowing it to be good and valid in all cases, where the parties at the time of making it were, in the first place, willing to contract; secondly, able to contract; and, lastly, actually did contract, in the proper forms and solemnities required by law.

Where parties are organized on a programmatic basis, rather than around identity, it can be difficult to employ an issue - based approach while avoiding perceptions of bias.

What this entails in practise is a two - way conversation where both parties move towards each other's position.

There have been plenty of instances in recent history across Europe where parties want to ban covering of the face:

Conversations over issues where the parties have a shared interest, like Lords reform, are suspected by Tory backbenchers of being used as a cover for discussions about longer - term prospects.

From my perspective I was born in a western EU country where the parties that came after the fall of the dictatorship (and that still remain the biggest parties to this day) are named Social - Democracy Party, and Socialist Party.

WOOHOO Party Time... though a lot of us have googling where the parties were till you guys fixed the site.

If it is * their * normal and is presented as such, especially in an open adoption situation where all parties are sharing the same reasons and explanations for the adoption, the kid can accept it as their normal after exploring his / her feelings about the situation.

Finding fun things to do with a bunch of kids call for thrifty creativity, especially where parties are involved.

A critical moment where past wrongs could be accepted as fact and put in the past, and where both parties could make progress for the future.

But if that does happen, it will have to be a situation where both parties announce to the world that whatever ambiguity existed in the relationship is gone.

Mergers or acquisitions which would otherwise be prohibited may be «authorised» in advance where the parties can demonstrate a public benefit which would outweight the likely anti-competitive detriment associated with the merger or where it can be shown the merger would not substantially lessen competition.

This contrasts with the multiparty system of many other countries, where the parties represent particular competing geographical, economic, or religious groups within the nation.

In a statement Oasis said: «At [the EA's] request we have made several changes to our online content and believed that we had reached a point where both parties could be satisfied that our relationship would continue.»

Although many outside the US are drawing conclusions about Americans based on our presidential candidates, they might be surprised to learn that only 14 per cent of eligible voters chose either Clinton or Trump during the primary elections, (where both parties vote to nominate a candidate to represent them in the general election) and less than 30 per cent of eligible Americans voted at all.

As Pete reports, the statesman Gates explains that Congress (where both parties are very well organized) really wasn't good enough for him or any decent and civilized person.

Undue influence, as I understand it, is a situation where the parties involved have unequal power.