If you want to understand
where public education reform is heading, look south and east to Florida, where the governor - elect, Rick Scott, is talking about a new funding student formula that is more likely to destroy the public school system than accomplish anything else.
Not exact matches
Like Cameron in his first ever PMQs,
where he marked a shift in Tory strategy by declaring he would work with the then prime minister Tony Blair on his
education reforms, we must similarly mark ourselves out to the
public.
· Allowing counties an option to modify how they fund state mandated pension contributions · Providing counties more audit authority in the special
education preschool program · Improving government efficiency and streamlining state and local legislative operations by removing the need for counties to pursue home rule legislative requests every two years with the state legislature in order to extend current local sales tax authority · Reducing administrative and reporting requirements for counties under Article 6
public health programs ·
Reforming the Workers Compensation system · Renewing Binding Arbitration, which is scheduled to sunset in June 2013, with a new definition of «ability to pay» for municipalities under fiscal distress, making it subject to the property tax cap (does not apply to NYC)
where «ability to pay» will be defined as no more than 2 percent growth in the contract.
That is an aim we're fulfilling through
public service
reform — as in schools,
where parents are getting more control than ever before over their children's
education.
Or as Buttenwieser says, summing up what he thinks the degree is for: «It's training the next Arne Duncan,» referring to the U.S. secretary of
education, who Buttenwieser says created many successful
reforms in Chicago,
where he served as CEO of the
public school system before joining the Obama administration.
After more than two decades of work in the school
reform trenches, Mr. Wolk retired in 1997 and moved to Rhode Island,
where he has continued to remain active in trying to improve
public education.
What has become clear is that explicitly focusing on the educational concerns of poor and minority children regardless of
where they live, and expanding that to the criminal justice
reform and other the social issues that end up touching (and are touched by) American
public education, is critical, both in helping all children succeed as well as rallying long - terms support for the movement from the parents and communities that care for them.
In these uncertain economic times
where American families put an ever - higher premium on a good
education, and with nagging doubts about flaws in funding in the
public education system, the
education reform movement has become a red - hot button.
Michael Petrilli of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a Washington - based
education advocacy group, said the family will face a tough choice among
public, private and charter schools in a city
where attempts at
education reform have become symbolic of the issue nationwide.
Additionally, Communities for
Public Education Reform (CPER) offered financial assistance in convening key grassroots leaders and organizers to the summit
where AROS was launched in Los Angeles, while the Ford Foundation provided support for coordination of AROS's early activities.
Robert Balfanz is a research professor at Johns Hopkins University School of
Education,
where he is also co-director of the Talent Development Secondary
reform model, co-director of the Everyone Graduates Center, and co-operator of Baltimore Talent Development High School, an Innovation High School operated in partnership with the Baltimore City
Public Schools.
Nowhere is this «so sue me» attitude more in display than in Connecticut,
where those pushing
education «reform,» Gov. Dannel Malloy and Education Commissioner Stefan Pryor, are, like Joel Klein, lawyers who never worked in a publi
education «
reform,» Gov. Dannel Malloy and
Education Commissioner Stefan Pryor, are, like Joel Klein, lawyers who never worked in a publi
Education Commissioner Stefan Pryor, are, like Joel Klein, lawyers who never worked in a
public school.
Welcome to the corporate
education reform industry world,
where laws and the
public good is simply something to be worked around.
Frankly, I would rate the
reform bill about a 7 on a scale of 1 - 10,
where a 10 represents the boldness in structural
reform that would begin to truly transform the culture of
public education and produce the kind of enhancement in student achievement our children deserve.
In a state
where public schoolteachers have marched on the state Capitol and staged walk - ins to protest pay and policy
reforms, the N.C. Court of Appeals issued a ruling Tuesday that buoyed the spirits of the rallying educators and struck a blow to the Republican
education agenda in North Carolina.
Prior to working in the federal government she was the Director of
Public Policy and Community Partnerships for Green Dot
Public Schools
where she was responsible for executing Green Dot's
reform agenda by advocating at the local, state and federal level for
education reform, supporting existing schools with compliance and oversight, the development of new schools and overseeing the implementation a community schools model at the new Locke Wellness Center.
I agree that special
education needs drastic
reform especially in
public schools
where I find attention to students with special needs especially lacking.
We are talking about billionaires and millionaires and the major
education reform companies, organizations and foundations dumping tens of millions of dollars into state and local efforts to elect handpicked accomplices or even,
where necessary, changing the rules to make it easier to open charter schools and dismantle the core elements of a broad - based
public education system.
Bryan also serves as senior
education advisor to Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP,
where she assists both private and
public entities with the implementation of
education reforms and counsels clients on
education policy issues.
Portfolio management is a relatively recent
reform in
public education where a district's central office, rather than managing a set of uniform
public schools, operates a more diverse set of schools (including traditional
public schools, charter schools, and non-profit organizations) as a portfolio.
Skeptics say this follows in the footsteps of Milton Friedman's greatest influence in South America — Chile —
where reforms of the past 30 years have radically
reformed and improved
public education.
Polls showed that his most unpopular issue was
education,
where only 22 - 26 % of voters approved his harsh and punitive
reform policies of closing
public schools, grading schools, rating teachers based on student test scores, opening hundreds of small schools, and favoring charter schools with free
public space.
«This is light years ahead of
where the state is now,» said Doug Harris, a UW - Madison
education and
public affairs professor who advised the state's accountability
reform task force.
Charles Zogby, the state
education secretary, says the goal is «to introduce a more market - based
reform into
public education...
where you have a diverse set of providers... but everybody is under the same accountability measures.»