Sentences with phrase «where rational people»

It's hard to believe we live in a world where rational people might equip a 4,500 - pound sport - utility with a four - cylinder engine, yet we weren't horrified after driving a 2016 Ford Explorer XLT with the turbocharged 2.3 - liter engine.

A sense that politics shouldn't be so different from the rest of life, where rational people do somehow find a way of overcoming their disagreements.

Yes, there is an argument for increasing capacity, but as the NAO found, long distance inter-city journeys for the business elite (and MPs of course) is not where any rational person would chuck at least # 50 billion to start the fight against crush - hour conditions.

Not exact matches

In particular, consider the following question: Can you think of a market in any item where each item was priced perfectly, so that every (rational) person agreed on its value?

To tell someone that they deserve to go where the worst people in the world go when they die is still insulting, even if you're rational enough to know such a place is a fairy tale.

People like you think we should all «seek» him, yet there is no rational reason to seek anything or have any idea where to seek.

Where rational reflection and laws order the multiplicity of instincts into a unity, so religious belief issues its imperative and laws to each person and to the collective entity.

I do nt want to end up being like you, a drone who looks incredibly silly to rational thinking people speaking on and on about their invisible man even in situations where its simply not wanted or warranted.

Religious people can not be trusted to make rational decisions where their religion is concerned.

If heroes and gods of myth as well as comic book characters have powers similar to those of Jesus, where does the rational person draw the line?

I believe we are our brothers and sisters keepers and one could make the argument that it falls under the category of rational self interest; however, the minute people think they can enforce that philosophy at the end of a barrel of a gun (gov «t) the whole thing falls apart and religion becomes secular humanism where the state replaces God.

I like to think of myself as a fairly rational individual, which is why what has and is going on at Arsenal confounds me... little wonder people have gone so far as to suggest that Wenger is actually sabotaging the club... one only needs to look at our starting 11 to stoke the flames of conspiracy... just think of the perceived importance of this game, considering the loss to Stoke, the historically significance of the two teams involved, the controversy that swirled around our two meetings last season, the proximity to the closing of the window and the general disdain being directed towards the manager once again... how is it even possible that you wouldn't come to Anfield with all guns blazing... not a single shot on target, with the back - up keeper in no less... where were the new signings?

«You don't end up with profits which represent people's rational voluntary choices about where they would like to direct their money,» he says.

It apparently didn't have the effect we wanted it to have, but it was a little known part of the effort that people who worked at Los Alamos put into trying to get a rational decisions made about where we go from here.

Have doing some thinking as of recently on how current events taking place in a person's life in how certain choices are made of where the present locations are happing of how either straight forward in reasoning of decision making to move forward to even more complex layers of design of reasoning of rational thought to advance on to vast intricate levels of interweaving planing to proceed with life's journey.

They very crafty and know the power of emotional strength people put into online relationship — unfortunately the rational part of the users brain is somehow overruled by the need to be loved, and this is where vulnerability takes place.

You will become far more rational and productive, and then, you will have more opportunities «to do that thing rich people do, where they turn money into more money.»

Behavioral economists have known for a long time that people are not completely rational beings and that behavior plays out in the financial markets, where we see evidence of herding behavior, speculation and mania.

So, if the option exists, people will choose — without the God - like pronouncements of the Killians and others — to live where they can access non-polluting energy, get by with less energy, and grow their crops with less inputs, «simply» because it makes rational economic sense.

His biggest goal in life was to see a rational approach to policy about climate change, where he tried to evaluate the odds and show people, just like in many other decisions in life, with climate they had to play the odds.

Doesn't mean there's some halo of wrongness that I let confuse me where I disagree with the IPCC about the wrong and toss out the things any rational person must admit the IPCC may be right about.

cwon14 / WUWT ignorantly spews toxic venom: • Dr. Curry's «technical comments are a distraction», and • Dr. Curry's views «aren't a rational position», and • Dr. Curry's merely «the least insane person», and • Dr. Curry is «a poster child for failed skeptics», and • Dr. Curry «is completely corrupted», and • Dr. Curry «is a statist in the end game», and • Dr. Curry's weblog is «where skeptics go to die», and • Dr. Curry's ««pause» is yet another stupid concept», and • Dr. Curry's belongs to «pinhead academia», and • Dr. Curry's research is «more climate science magic dust» (multiple further abusive claims not quoted)

If there are as many people opposed to the Ceres Project as the Heartland Farmers claim, and there are many good reasons for it to not be built, where are those who are willing to stand up and put a cogent, rational and civil argument?

And I have gained an implicit respect for the overwhelmingly rational approach I've seen the vast majority of people take, * no matter where it took them.

Where «rational» means derived from a person's cultural history and most likely given that history.

When people (climate also) go wretchedly wrong is that they fail to produce a sequence of rational steps where one conclusion follows from another.

Often the two political agendas collide and there are those who believe that one is more important than the other, but most rational people would agree that improving the environment where it has been degraded would be a good thing.

See Matt Ridley's «The Rational Optimist» concernin'the mad, mad world of biofuels in a world where species are vanishing and more than a billion people do not have enough to eat.

The government setting the cost of a commodity at a point where it become cost prohibitive for people to actually, you know, use it, is not capitalism, let alone «free market capitalism» in any rational sense of the word.

Julie: A lot of folks still rely on the thoughts of Murry Bowen and people who have a more general systems theory about families, where the emotions are pitted against rational thinking and one interferes with the other.

People do not separate animal instinct from rational decision making, and that's where the issues happen.