Sentences with phrase «where rules of court»

Not exact matches

Unlike Hobby Lobby, where the High Court ruled narrowly to allow for - profit companies to exempt themselves from aspects of the health - care law for religious reasons, the latest cases deal with broader elements that underpin the ACA.

At the very least, controversial emails or other communications from high - profile or powerful people that are disclosed publicly — no matter how they are obtained — are considered in the court of public opinion where no rules of admissibility apply.

And yet emails received in the rule - free court of public opinion may not be admissible in a court of law, where strict rules of admissibility apply.

However, he praised the U.K.'s legal system, saying «we have the good fortune to live in a country where everyone... even government is subject to the rule of law, so the government will comply with the judgment of the court and do all that is necessary to implement it.»

where the high court ruled against the Native American Church, of Oregon, which incorporated a peyote - taking ceremony into its rites.

Comparable treatment can be found in Europe, where EU member states exempt virtual currencies from taxation as a result of the Court of Justice of the European Union's ruling on October 22, 2015 stating that the exchange of traditional currency for Bitcoin virtual currency (and vice versa) is exempt from value added tax in the EU.

The Amalekites Rule this land now where there is no morality, there is no absolute punishement of their courts, and their spawn attack the defenseless, as those events are the only ones tragic enough to make the news

Many who hated Scalia's rulings could not help but be entertained by his razor - sharp writing, which he used especially in his dissenting opinions to carve up the majority's reasoning (my favorite is Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where among other things he referred to the majority's «Nietzschean vision of us unelected, life - tenured judges — leading a Volk who will be «tested by following»» the Court's rulings obediently).

But he renewed his fight at London's Court of Appeal, where his lawyers argued the earlier rulings should be overturned.

reveals no instance where the Court ruled on the merits of a civil, criminal, or administrative action involving government favoritism or discrimination against a particular religion.

They attended a school - board meeting in October 1993 where they distributed material citing federal laws and court rulings upholding the rights of pregnant students to participate in public school extracurricular activities.

He renewed his fight at London's Court of Appeal on Wednesday, where his lawyers argued the earlier rulings should be overturned.

The ever vigilant state charged her with illegal discrimination and took her to court, where the California Supreme Court ruled against her appeal to the free exercise of her relicourt, where the California Supreme Court ruled against her appeal to the free exercise of her reliCourt ruled against her appeal to the free exercise of her religion.

In short, states where courts have ruled on same - sex marriage are «black hole» states where few or no specific religious protections are given, according to Robin Fretwell Wilson, a University of Illinois law professor who leads a group of legal scholars that advise lawmakers on religious exemptions.

Gik were visited by two inspectors last August and were then taken to court where it was ruled that blue wine does not fit among the 17 approved types of wine.

In one of the first cases to test this law, the 11th Circuit Court has ruled that breastfeeding mothers do not get to dictate where this pumping room is located.

Before ruling against joint custody, the court may also consider hospital and police records (in cases of abuse or where allegations of abuse are present) as well as character witnesses.

In the case that comes before the High Court today — July 31st, 2013 — only time will tell if the 8th amendment will play a significant part, or not, in the ultimate ruling on where Aja Teehan and Charles Brand will be «allowed» to welcome the newest member of their family into this world.

In cases where no «better parent» is established and the courts rule in favor of joint custody, parents should work together to determine a parenting schedule.

The memo, which was circulated to prison governors on November 26th, reads: «The criminal casework directorate (CCD) of the Border and Immigration Agency have confirmed to us that as a rule they have no interest in pursuing foreign national prisoners serving sentences of less than 12 months for deportation unless they have a court recommendation for deportation, are already subject to deportation proceedings, or (in the case of non-EEA nationals) were sentenced to less than 12 months but where the current sentence plus one or two previous sentences within the last five years (taking account of the most significant sentences during the period) total 12 months or more.»

While reacting to Monday's verdict by Justic Buba, the State Government hailed the ruling, and disclosed that Government would immediately seek arraignment and prosecution of the suspects at the Lagos High Court where charges are pending before Honourable Justice Lawal Akapo.

But the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled last December that the UK's «general and indiscriminate» retention of citizens» data communications was unlawful where it wasn't being scooped up for serious crime cases.

«The appropriate forum in which to respond to the Senator is a court of law, where the Attorney General will prove all facts according to the rules of evidence.

If «directs» includes a case where a US President «asks» (or directs someone else to «ask») a member of the Supreme Court to rule in a certain way while making it clear that it is in the best interest (financial, safety, privacy, etc) of the Supreme Court member to rule that way, then I'm sure it has at various times already happened... just part of politics and human nature.

A long battle over where the body of Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen should be permanently laid to rest took another turn this week, when a New York appeals court ruled that his remains should stay in New York, for now.

Lewis joined Teachout and Wu at a press conference outside the Brooklyn courthouse where arguments were heard today in Cuomo's appeal of a state supreme court ruling that Teachout meets the residency requirements for governor set forth in the state constitution.

Recently the courts ruled in favour of the government in another case where diplomatic immunity was abused.

The ruling by the court likely means the fate of the travel ban will likely rest with the U.S. Supreme Court, where Trump has vowed to apcourt likely means the fate of the travel ban will likely rest with the U.S. Supreme Court, where Trump has vowed to apCourt, where Trump has vowed to appeal.

«Unless we apply the break and uphold the rule of law and democratic conventions and practices in all ramifications, our greatest losses, moving forward, will not be economic recession, lack of critical infrastructure, among others, but an irredeemably deteriorated civilian rule where the decisions of the courts, letters and spirit of the law, resolutions of the legislature, electoral choices of Nigerians as expressed through the ballot no longer count.»

That the UK government is now in the position where the court has ruled against it and is insisting that parliament must vote before article 50 can be triggered underlines the chaos and confusion at the heart of the Tories» handling of Brexit.

Makarfi and his faction were said to be planning to implement the report if they get favourable judgment at the Supreme Court, where they had filed an appeal against the Court of Appeal judgment, which ruled that Sheriff remained the chairman of the former ruling party.

They cited three previous cases where courts ruled such questions are «relevant and probative» when they concern a defendant's actions in the context of a securities fraud prosecution, including that of pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli, whom Agnifilo represented.

An Accra High Court has ruled in favour of flagbearer of the All People's Congress, Hassan Ayariga in a case where the APC flag bearer is challenging his disqualification from this year's presidential elections.

The home secretary said the government disagrees strongly with the European court of human rights» (ECHR) ruling last month preventing Qatada's deportation to Jordan, where he is wanted on terror charges.

State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman took a large step toward making New York one of several states to allow late - term abortions in cases where the mother's health is in jeopardy or the fetus suffers a fatal complication, relying on Supreme Court rulings he said overrode existing law.

The Delta Force case was viewed as the perfect avenue for the government to send a strong message to such acts, especially during the first court appearance of the 13, where escaped from lawful custody, after eight of their compatriots sparked confusion in the court in protest of the Judge's ruling that the 13 be remanded and not given bail.

As an example of one area where they've butted heads, he cited the state's refusal to increase education funding for the city after a landmark court ruling found the Big Apple has been consistently shortchanged.

He told the court that parliament had taken «a carefully considered, deliberate decision» to give ministers such as the attorney general power to override rulings by the freedom of information tribunal «to protect the public interest where real and significant issues arise».

Should fracking go forward in New York, a recent Court of Appeals ruling limits where it can happen.

A «democracy «where a Democrat for Governor promotes austerity budgets while providing tax cuts to the rich, where the Republicans demand even more money for the rich and an end to the New Deal, and where the Supreme court repeatedly rule in favor of the 1 % to buy our political system under the guise of free speech.

This is of particular importance in public corruption cases, where the rules changed about five years ago, after the Supreme Court imposed the requirement in honest services fraud cases that the government prove a quid pro quo.

State Supreme Court justice Evelyn Frazee ruled today that the group will have to vacate the south end of the park, where it's been encamped since October.

Tedisco caught up with POLITICO by phone from his office in Clifton Park, where he lamented the state of talks and the effect of a 2004 court ruling, Silver v. Pataki, which confirmed the governor's exclusive power to draft budget legislation.

Study participants were brought one - at - a-time onto the court, where Lifshin gave each person a 30 - second description of the challenge and rules.

Northern Ireland remains the only part of the UK where women can not access abortion unless their life is endangered by pregnancy — a legal situation that is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, according to a Belfast High Court ruling in 2015.

That would send it back to the appeals level where courts have ruled on the side of the states.

Gorsuch pointed to several state - court rulings criminalizing conduct only where it substantially interfered with the actual functioning of the school, rather than momentarily diverting attention from classroom activity.

The case eventually made its way to the Supreme Court, where the ruling adopted much of Gorsuch's reasoning that displaying one monument, even if it is religious, did not obligate a governmental authority to display other offered monuments from other groups, including religious organizations.

The case ricocheted through Colorado to the U.S. Supreme Court and back to Colorado again, where the state supreme court is set to reconsider its ruling against vouchers on the grounds of Colorado's Blaine Amendment, which prohibits public funding of religious institutCourt and back to Colorado again, where the state supreme court is set to reconsider its ruling against vouchers on the grounds of Colorado's Blaine Amendment, which prohibits public funding of religious institutcourt is set to reconsider its ruling against vouchers on the grounds of Colorado's Blaine Amendment, which prohibits public funding of religious institutions.

The district appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, where the justices ordered the Colorado Supreme Court to rehear the case in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2017 Trinity ruling.