Not exact matches
And the beauty of expanding
school choice is that it generates its own advocates as families that benefit from these programs lobby to protect and expand their
choices.We are almost at the point
where ed
reform organizations don't have to do very much other than to coordinate
choice families pushing for more
choices.
One of the most notable «laboratories of democracy» was Texas,
where governors on both sides of the aisle pursued a
reform agenda, starting in the early 1980s, centered on higher academic standards, standardized testing,
school accountability, competition, and
choice.
As
reform ideas expand from
school choice to educational
choice — not just
where a child learns but how they learn — more research is needed on the accounts to determine how a menu of educational
choices affects student achievement and parent satisfaction over a longer time horizon.
This most radical of
choice based
schools —
where students and teachers never meet in physical classrooms and state funding flows on a performance - based, demand - driven model — has largely avoided the political and legal tangles that have stymied other
reform efforts.
Before going to Stanford, she was an analyst at the U.S. Department of Education (ED),
where she coordinated national evaluations of
school choice initiatives, comprehensive
school reform, and bilingual education.
But after many hours of conversations with researchers and practitioners as diverse as Anthony Bryk (Stanford University), Linda Darling Hammond (Stanford), Gene Bottoms (Southern Regional Education Board), Judy Codding (America's
Choice cofounder), and Ted Sizer (Coalition of Essential
Schools), Vander Ark became convinced that high school was where the reform money was most needed and that existing high schools were intrinsically weak institutions that could not be fixed on the m
Schools), Vander Ark became convinced that high
school was
where the
reform money was most needed and that existing high
schools were intrinsically weak institutions that could not be fixed on the m
schools were intrinsically weak institutions that could not be fixed on the margins.
Where school reform is needed,
choice with accountability works better to achieve the wide range of goals we have for education than a free market ideology that relies on
choice alone.
Nowhere has
school reform been more prevalent than Florida,
where students have watched a punitive group of legislators push a
choice agenda.
Corey A. DeAngelis is a distinguished doctoral fellow and a Ph.D. student in Education Policy in the Department of Education
Reform at the University of Arkansas
where he is affiliated with the
School Choice Demonstration Project (SCDP).
Michael Petrilli of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a Washington - based education advocacy group, said the family will face a tough
choice among public, private and charter
schools in a city
where attempts at education
reform have become symbolic of the issue nationwide.
A similar kind of grassroots
reform is taking root in Los Angeles Unified
School District, where pioneering teachers started designing their own school reform plans as part of a program called Public School C
School District,
where pioneering teachers started designing their own
school reform plans as part of a program called Public School C
school reform plans as part of a program called Public
School C
School Choice.
«The provision of
choice, and the publication of data on
school performance, has sometimes had little impact, especially in districts
where reform lacks adequate local ownership, community and wider civic involvement, and parent engagement,» Bruno Manno notes.
It is a place
where several major
reform efforts are going on at once, making it a good prism for viewing
school choice.
His work has been published in various scholarly journals, such as: Social Science Quarterly, The Rural Educator, Educational Policy, the Journal of Education Finance, and the Journal of
School Choice: International Research and
Reform,
where he serves on the editorial board.
Another
reform approach that is often touted is to create more charter
schools and give parents vouchers so they can have more
choices of
where to send their kids.
In Alabama,
where the state sustained aggressive reading instruction and curriculum
reform (even as it failed to overhaul teacher quality and expand
school choice), 33 percent of students read Below Basic, a 15 percent decline from nine years ago; the percentage of poor fourth - graders who were functionally illiterate declined by 16 percent in that same period, from 61 percent to 45 percent.
Same for the District of Columbia,
where reform efforts, including the overhaul of the traditional district as well as the expansion of
school choice, has also yielded fruit.
From our perspective, the religion issues are vital, because
where school choice has the most potential policy benefit is in America's inner cities,
where the public
schools range from mediocre to wretched, and
where school reform has been going on for some 30 years, with no visible effect.
Lessons From Los Angeles Unlike New York City —
where philanthropic funding supported a top - down approach to
reform, a fairly similar set of
reform ideas (
school level autonomy,
choice, and accountability) have spread more slowly and organically in Los Angeles.