Sentences with phrase «where science points»

Not exact matches

Yes, he'd understood the science of DNA testing was incomplete, and that there was vigorous debate over the efficacy (and even potential downside) of population screening, and that it still wasn't clear if the process had reached the point where two different testing companies would even arrive at the same results.

Even science - and you know it better than I do - points to an understanding of reality as a place where every element connects and interacts with everything else,» the pope said.

Even if hindsight bias allows us to point out all the cases where it has turned out to be a mistake — a mistake that sometimes delayed paradigm shifts in science for years or decades — it's still usually best to start by attempting to explain anomalous observations within the theoretical framework we have.

n8263 I like to say that we have «confidence» in the method behind science where ideas do not become dogmatic, new evidence can change what we thought we know, and that all the experts are looking for the mistakes and eager to point them out if there are any.

Science leads us to where the evidence points.

The point is that our culture has reached a level of understanding where many of the well educated scientific and cultural leaders of our day have abandoned supersti - tion in favor of science and reason.

As I've pointed out, there have been instances in the past where people explained phenomena with spiritual answers, only to have those explanation later debunked by science.

Granted, the believers are perfectly happy relying on scientists and science to — I don't know — talk to people around the world instantaneously via this comment board, and then get in their cars, and fly in planes, and use electricity, and watch TV — all of those things based on science, and yet, when someone points out that scientists have mapped the human genome and other primates and can show, irrefutably, where the different primate families branched off — well, no, no no!

Insert the God of your choosing at any point where science hasn't answered the natural phenomenon.

19) of the Posterior Analytics, where Aristotle describes how the mind ascends to the first principles on which all science is grounded, he points out that the immediate point of departure of the inductive movement is not mere sense perception, but «experience»: «So from perception there comes memory, as we call it, and from memory (when it occurs often in connection with the same thing), experience; for memories that are many in number form a single experience.

At that point in Science and the Modern World where Whitehead observes: «The relation of part to whole has the special reciprocity associated with the notion of organism, in which the part is for the whole»; he confirms: «but this relation reigns throughout nature and does not start with the special case of the higher organisms» [SMW 149].

The hard sciences of physics and chemistry and biology are twisted into grotesque propaganda machines fueled by corrupted versions of sociology and psychology, where science itself dies alongside genuine inquiry and clarity of thought, as man is assimilated into a faceless colony of manageable data points.

The speculative dogmatic, being itself aware of this to a certain degree, has known no other way to help itself but by the maneuver, not very seemly in a philosophic science, of throwing out a detachment of asseverations at the point where a movement is being made.

Once we get to a point in this country where people like you aren't blasting people like me with lies, misinformation, junk science, and scriptural hypocrisy, then we'll talk.

As mankind progresses and leaves the Dark Ages farther and farther behind, knowledge and science inexorably debunks myth after religious myth to the point where religion is exposed as nothing more than a sick joke, nothing but a method to gain control and power over the masses.

We have already reached the point where the discoveries of science can «greatly bless or wholly destroy.»

As David Griffin points out, the great successes of science have come from studying aggregates, such as balls on inclined planes and solar systems, where Newtonian mechanics or the Cartesian system applies (RS 24).

These are points where science and Faith become closer than some would want to believe.

Yet, one day, science will most likely * IMO * get to the point where they will be able to answer that question.

Of course, George Washington died about 200 years ago, before science had advanced to the point where we could explain our existence without a supreme being.

Modern science: Looks like the beginning of our universe was a huge explosion where everything came from a single point in space time.

The unfortunate result might be a Dark Ages of sorts where people will, wrongfully, point their fingers at technology and science as the culprits instead of misguided leaders and corporate greed.

The contemporary use of models in science or theology — models which are not picturing models — points us back, then, to that moment of insight where along with a model there is disclosed to the scientist or the theologian that about which each is to be, in his characteristically different way, articulate.21

In today's intellectual climate, where so many who invoke science in support of Christianity seem to do so in more or less veiled forms of creationism (for example, in the «Intelligent Design» school of thought), and where the prevailing mindset is a complacent presumption that science has disproved religion, it is a matter of pressing urgency to proclaim from the housetops how the magnificent success of modern science points unambiguously to the existence of the supreme Mind of the Creator, and how the trajectory of thought which begins there leads convincingly to Jesus Christ as Lord of the Cosmos.

There was 1 category the researcher pointed out to us where we need work no further to increasing the percentage of female characters doing this, which is forensic science.

L2 is where many Western science spacecraft are stationed, Lester noted, and after spending some time there, Chang» e 2 could flip out to other Lagrange points.

North Korea is a case in point where science diplomacy may act as a pivotal tool for alleviating political tension and facilitating exchanges.

My interest grew to the point where I became frustrated at the lack of interest paid to the game by the sports science community in Australia and consequently the scarcity of opportunities.

I think I am not the only one who thinks this has gone past the point where it's not even really a science anymore.

I think much of it has really gotten to the point where it's not even a legitimate science anymore.

At that point, the science I had the most view of was ecology: what birds eat, where they migrate, how they feed their young.

I think that has made it possible for more scientists to engage the public, to the point where reputable scientists can write books about science and not have to suffer like Gamow suffered decades ago.

Douay, for his part, is not surprised it has taken more than a century for science to get even to this point, where the future of subbing in stem cells for blood products still remains little more than a reverie.

«I say this with respect, but the correspondence between the quality of science and where it is published is not one - to - one,» Barrett points out.

He implicitly argued that science (aided in no small part by his theories) had expanded to the point where it redefined not only humanity's relationship to the universe but also humanity's relationship to the divine.

Professor Don Levitan, chair of the Department of Biological Science, writes in the latest issue of Marine Ecology Progress Series that bleaching — a process where high water temperatures or UV light stresses the coral to the point where it loses its symbiotic algal partner that provides the coral with color — is also affecting the long - term fertility of the coral.

Due to climate change, she said, the world faces «one of the most daunting crossroads in the evolution of human history, we are at the point where we must decide: are we going to ignore science or are we going to rise to the call of history and forge a new life on Earth paradigm... where nature and humanity support each other.»

Neil Turok:»... The science has reached the point where questions that used to be just philosophy could be observationally testable in 10 or 20 years...»

I mean, you know, it's one thing to develop the science to the point where you can produce this stuff.

To take a measure of our progress, Discover offers a look in that mirror as we analyze the 25 greatest stepping - stones in robotics, points in time where science fiction meshes with science fact.

«There are some building - science labs out there who try to bring in as many components as possible, but we never thought they got to the point where they really could address all the issues that might come up in a building design standard,» says Dana Pillai, president of Delos's research division and executive director of the Well Living Lab.

Researchers at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST) have mapped the points along the genome where a scaffolding protein crucial to maintaining the genome's structure binds.

«It has gotten to a point where for the science to move forward, these issues have to be addressed,» she says.

«Geology is the most important science of the 21st century because there is only one earth, and it's becoming clear that we could damage it beyond the point where it could support us,» he says.

But this figure is on the rise in 17 out of 28 countries, including Bulgaria, where 66 % of respondents agree that science takes too much precedence over faith — a whopping 14 - point increase.

While this body of knowledge arose mainly from the software industry, where complex projects can be tough to manage and the stakes high — case in point: Healthcare.gov — it is applicable to other domains, including science.

We've reached a point now in the interdisciplinary growth of our science where we've got climate scientists, who understand the physics of climate and how that translates to uncertainties, working hand in hand with economists who will run the projected impacts through a cost - benefit analysis.

We support fundamental science and engineering at a point in the road to discovery where that path is anything but clear.

«This evaluation is intended to point out where forensic practice is well founded in science and where it is not and to produce a research agenda to serve as the basis for arriving at forensic methods that will inspire greater confidence in our criminal justice system,» says the report, the second of two AAAS reports on the state of forensic science, the first focusing on the quality of fire investigations in the United States.

«I've been waiting for this science to get to the point where it had a bona fide cure, something that worked.