Sentences with phrase «where such violation»

Can a lawyer assist in violating section 15 of the Charter, where such a violation can be justified under section 1 (or under the NWC?)?

American Chemical Society, Committee on International Activities and Subcommittee on Scientific Freedom and Human Rights Contact: Brad Miller ACS monitors the world for violations of the human rights of scientists and joins with other societies in petitioning the governments of the countries where such violations take place.

Not exact matches

Subject to certain exceptions to be approved by the relevant regulators or certain facts to be ascertained, the public offer will not be made directly or indirectly, in or into any jurisdiction where to do so would constitute a violation of the laws of such jurisdiction, or by use of the mails or by any means or instrumentality (including without limitation, facsimile transmission, telephone and the internet) of interstate or foreign commerce, or any facility of a national securities exchange, of any such jurisdiction.

The Information provided in such Publications is however only intended for use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations.

None of the products and services referred to in the Publications of the Saxo Bank Group are available to recipients residing in countries where the provision of such products and services would constitute a violation of mandatory applicable legislation or regulations.

Indeed, the bill is so poorly worded, some of them said, that it could be interpreted as abolishing basic property rights where museums are concerned and mandating the deaccession of such substantial portions of» their collections that they would be forced to abdicate their fiduciary responsibility — and thus be in violation of other laws.

In 2015, Nestle took to the streets to promote the SMA brand, such as at the Leicester Mela, where health campaigners were on hand to provide information on the rulings against Nestle's misleading claims and its violations of marketing requirements (picture at top of page).

That social mobilization for human rights can have an impact even where such powerful actors are concerned is exemplified by the adoption of a resolution by the Human Rights Council in June 2014 to move towards the elaboration of a binding treaty to prevent human rights violations by transnational corporations Click here for full WABA Press Release See Right To Food and Nutrition Watch 2014 Press Release Download the Watch 2014 report For more information also see: rtfn - watch.

«I have found no case where charges similar or analogous to those against Congressman Rangel resulted in censure — a penalty thusfar reserved for such serious violations as supporting armed insurrection against the United States and the sexual abuse of minors.»

The Harrison Act did not recognize addiction as a treatable condition and therefore the therapeutic use of cocaine, heroin or morphine to such individuals was outlawed — leading the Journal of American Medicine to remark,» [the addict] is denied the medical care he urgently needs, open, above - board sources from which he formerly obtained his drug supply are closed to him, and he is driven to the underworld where he can get his drug, but of course, surreptitiously and in violation of the law.»

The proposed Final Judgment further requires the Antitrust Compliance Officer to ensure that each such person receives training related to the proposed Final Judgment and the antitrust laws; to ensure certification by each such person of compliance with the terms of the proposed Final Judgment; to conduct an annual antitrust compliance audit; to be available to receive information concerning violations of the proposed Final Judgment and to take appropriate action to remedy any violations of the proposed Final Judgment; and to maintain a log of communications between officers and directors of Settling Defendants, involved in the development of strategies related to e-books, and any person associated with another Publisher Defendant, where that communication relates to the selling of books in any format in the United States.

Thus, in suits for damages based on violations of federal statutes lacking any express authorization of a damage remedy, this Court has authorized such relief where, in its view, damages are necessary to effectuate the congressional policy underpinning the substantive provisions of the statute.

Such latent health and safety violations appear to be the principle reason for the alteration of the limitation period, and can reasonably be characterized as the government response to cases such as an unsuccessful OHSA prosecution involving the Corporation of the City of Guelph, (2012 ONCJ 251 (CanLII)-RRB-, where a wall in a municipal building collapsed and tragically killed a student five years after the wall was buSuch latent health and safety violations appear to be the principle reason for the alteration of the limitation period, and can reasonably be characterized as the government response to cases such as an unsuccessful OHSA prosecution involving the Corporation of the City of Guelph, (2012 ONCJ 251 (CanLII)-RRB-, where a wall in a municipal building collapsed and tragically killed a student five years after the wall was busuch as an unsuccessful OHSA prosecution involving the Corporation of the City of Guelph, (2012 ONCJ 251 (CanLII)-RRB-, where a wall in a municipal building collapsed and tragically killed a student five years after the wall was built.

Alternatively, employers may react inappropriately to suspicious absences, which could lead to exposures to liability, such as in cases where the absence is related to illness and the employee alleges that the employer's reaction is in violation of the Human Rights Code.

The Claimants argued that the circumstances in which a duty to investigate an alleged violation of Article 5 arises were not limited to cases of enforced disappearance, but that an investigative duty arose in all cases where detention takes place beyond the reach of the courts, even if such detention was not secret or unacknowledged.

The cases include some interesting issues, such as the constitutionality of requiring voters to show a photo ID before they may vote; the constitutionality of execution by lethal injection where the procedure poses a risk of pain and suffering in violation of the Eighth Amendment ban on «cruel and unusual punishment»; and a Fourth Amendment case involving an unlawful search under state law that Volokh conspirator and Fourth Amendment guru Orin Kerr is interested in.

I acknowledge and agree that violation of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement by me may cause the Company irreparable harm, and therefore I agree that the Company will be entitled to seek extraordinary relief in court, including, but not limited to, temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions and permanent injunctions without the necessity of posting a bond or other security (or, where such a bond or security is required, I agree that a $ [NUMBER] bond will be adequate), in addition to and without prejudice to any other rights or remedies that the Company may have for a breach of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement.

The ECtHR narrowly rejected the application on the facts, but affirmed the principle that, while Convention institutions were not normally concerned with potential, as opposed to actual, violations of Convention rights, such rights were engaged where there was a real risk of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment in the requesting country.

As such, if I decide not to throttle or cap the network unless I have to, where it costs me more money, would I be in violation of Title II net neutrality?

Comment: Several commenters urged that the request for determination by the Secretary under proposed § 160.204 (a) be limited to cases where an exception is absolutely necessary, and that in making such a determination, the Secretary should be required to make a determination that the benefits of granting an exception outweigh the potential harm and risk of disclosure in violation of the regulation.

Therefore, a covered entity will generally be responsible for the actions of its employees such as where the employee discloses protected health information in violation of the regulation.

The court held that there had been no violation of the fathers» right to a public hearing as there were exceptions to this right, such as where the exclusion of the press and public might be justified to protect the privacy of the child and parties and to avoid prejudicing the interests of justice.

Such details may be: your full name and date of birth, your traffic violation, the law enforcement agency that issued your citation or the location where you committed the offense.

Specifics such as where the traffic fine was issued, the vehicle make and model, and the date and time of the violation can make a ticket invalid if it was written up incorrectly by the police officer.

Typically «speed traps» are in locations where there has been a higher number of people driving faster than the posted speed limit which poses a risk to pedestrians, where there has been a larger number of accidents, or as part of a crackdown after the implementation of an add - on (non-moving violation) charge such as not wearing a seat belt.

Ask for details such as your specific traffic violation, the citation number, when and where you were pulled over, and the name of the officer who issued the ticket.

Whether your co-worker took the credit for a task you performed, your teenager lied to you about where he was going or your husband forgot your anniversary, conflict is born from such personal violations.

Even in a cash transaction where no lender is involved, the buyer and seller may have to deal with all sorts of complications, such as removing any clouds on title (like satisfying any outstanding mortgages or paying any tax liens) or satisfying any municipal violations (for things like overgrown grass or excessive trash on the property).

189 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Naftal - listing agreements; deposits; unauthorized practice of law; vicarious liability; amendment of pleading to conform to the proof; improperly altering listing agreement without the consent or knowledge of principal to show the potential commission split with buyer's broker to meet MLS requirements; preparing and submitting fraudulent MLS change notifications purporting to extend and alter listings; deposit of escrow funds into operating account; preparation of lease constitutes the unauthorized practice of law; pleadings may be amended to conform to the proof and encompass a charge not stated in the complaint where the issue has been fully litigated by the parties and is closely enough related to the stated charges that there is no surprise or prejudice to the respondent; continuing to offer properties for sale after preparation of forged listing extensions violates 19 NYCRR 175.10; DOS fails to establish violation of 19 NYCRR 175.12 for failure to provide copy of listing extension where extension was not authorized by principal; DOS fails to demonstrate demand for unearned commission where broker may have believed they were entitled to a commission; broker's licenses suspended for one year and thereafter until such time as restitution in the amounts of $ 5,000.00 and $ 2,055.40 is made