Not exact matches
FMI membership covers the spectrum of diverse venues
where food is sold, including single
owner grocery stores, large multi-store
supermarket chains and mixed retail stores.
The property may have been the home of a friend, a
supermarket, a hospital, a hotel, a gym, a shopping mall, or any other property
where a visitor may sustain an injury because the property
owner has failed to safeguard against hazards.
Why don't we have a process
where the accused and the
supermarket -
owner are brought together within two weeks after the occurrence to establish what happened and to come to a suitable remedy if fraud was established?