Sentences with phrase «whether a man likes»

Whether your man likes to grill, cook or just EAT, here's some foodie gifts for men that I know he's going to love.

Not exact matches

Whether it's interacting with brands or catching up on current news, women are using networks like Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram more than men.

Every time a man, whether it is our president, or a news anchor, demeans or diminishes a woman by grabbing her ass or talking about her body, or coming on to her instead of asking for her ideas and treating her like a professional in the workplace setting, they lose something too.

«Women, just like men, should be allowed with their health care provider to decide whether to take on a risk.»

But whether its going in a better direction, I mean the funny thing is, no matter what direction it goes, no matter how great it is, there's going to be a bunch of shmucks that are trying to like make money off of it, and it's going to repeat itself: The amount of bands that sound like various other bands that once were great... it multiplies so quick, it's pretty funny man.

Whether you like or dislike Schumer, for instance, you are not going to hear him say «I'm not a finance guy, man».

To ask whether a Christian can «try on» atheism is rather like asking whether a married man can live as a bachelor.

D. Martyn Lloyd - Jones (1899 - 1981)[in an excerpt from Romans: The New Man, An Exposition of Chapter 6, Banner of Truth, 1972] said: There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of graMan, An Exposition of Chapter 6, Banner of Truth, 1972] said: There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of graman is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of grace.

We were debating whether or not it's helpful to use language like «act like a man,» or «true womanhood,» or «real men» in our religious dialogs, and I was arguing that the goal of the Christian life is to be conformed to the image of Christ, not idealized, culture - based gender stereotypes.

That may be the case, it can sometimes be hard to determine whether you have a wolf like man who has taken advantage of the system, or a man with good intentions who has been twisted by the system that he is in.

Therefore watch yourselves very carefully, so that you do not become corrupt and make for yourselves an idol, an image of any shape, whether formed like a man or a woman, or like any animal on earth or any bird that flies in the air...»

I believe what the bible teaches and man... if when I hit 80 and die, there is nothing... I would like to order a GUINNESS and 6 shots of jack... Everything is always only about Jesus... whether you believe it or not.

Before we start thanking the Lord that we are not like other men, we should ask ourselves whether our own alternative ecumenism, so often controlled by a few unaccountable powerbrokers and by big money, really possesses more integrity.

Furthermore I've seen many a believer get really upset (I mean, like really really upset) that atheism leads people to question whether man has any cosmic significance, why is this so important?

It's like the disciples, who asked Jesus whether a blind man's plight was the result of his sin or his parents» sin.

Rex like you i am saved and that is not dependent on whether i read the bible or tithe or go to church or fellowship i do those things because i love the Lord not because i have to.That is what the Lord meant when he said that the sabbath was for man not man for the sabbath.I agree that to live a christian life the old nature must be crucified with Christ and to live it we must die to it daily by submitting all our hearts to God and be lead by his holy spirit.brentnz

Like the show, the stories are hit or miss, and if you like Keillor, or the man Keillor is in many of his stories (whether in print or on the air), you'll appreciate even the misses, because even when the right word doesn't quite come, or when the timing is just a shade off, the tone usually survives — something lingers in the air, making us feel at home, comfortable, happy to be hLike the show, the stories are hit or miss, and if you like Keillor, or the man Keillor is in many of his stories (whether in print or on the air), you'll appreciate even the misses, because even when the right word doesn't quite come, or when the timing is just a shade off, the tone usually survives — something lingers in the air, making us feel at home, comfortable, happy to be hlike Keillor, or the man Keillor is in many of his stories (whether in print or on the air), you'll appreciate even the misses, because even when the right word doesn't quite come, or when the timing is just a shade off, the tone usually survives — something lingers in the air, making us feel at home, comfortable, happy to be here.

Nevertheless, I would like to raise the question whether Whitehead is not after all guilty of emphasizing and generalizing some factor that may indeed be peculiar to man and the higher animals, at the expense of another factor which could offer more genuine grounds for generalization.

If you were God everything would be right and everyone would love everyone and nothing bad would ever happen and the deficit would be eliminated and all the men would be good looking and all the women strong and all the children above average and a chicken in every pot and free beer on Fridays and we'd all like it whether we wanted to or not.

Whether by capturing the aspirations of the young women who want to feel like «angels» themselves or seizing the attention of young men who will expect women to fit a specific standard of looks, Victoria's Secret is cashing in.

THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD AND IT STANDS SURE... THE WORD OF GOD ALMIGHTY HAS BEEN SETTLED IN HEAVEN BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THIS WORLD... IF YOU LIKE BELIEVE IT OR NOT, «and i am so happy to tell you that WHETHER ANYONE BELIEVES IT OR NOT... ITS TOO LATE TO CHANGE GODS WORD... IT CAN NEVER BE BROKEN, ITS UNSHAKEABLE... IT DOES NOT FAIL EITHER, hahahahaha, thats when is so sweet... LET ALL MAN BE LIAR BUT GOD REMAINETH TRUE, i would never force anybody or kill myself because the Devil has blinded hearts of men from believing the truth... HALLELUYAH,,,, NO ONE CAN CHANGE GODS STANDARDS, NO ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We can not expect perfect reporting from men like ourselves, whether of the words of the «historical Jesus» or of those of the living Christ.

While Paul's thought is by no means always clear, and perhaps from letter to letter not always exactly the same, it is nevertheless certain that his concept of resurrection can be clearly distinguished from that of the traditional «bodily resurrection».27 Paul does not speak in terms of the «same body» but rather in terms of a new body, whether it be a «spiritual body», 28 «the likeness of the heavenly man», 29 «a house not made by human hands, eternal and in heaven», 30 or, a «new body put on» over the old.31 In using various figures of speech to distinguish between the present body of flesh and blood and the future resurrection body, he seems to be thinking of both bodies as the externals which clothe the spirit and without which we should «find ourselves naked».32 But he freely confesses that the «earthly frame that houses us today ’33 may, like the seed, and man of dust, be destroyed, but the «heavenly habitation», which the believer longs to put on, is already waiting in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal by nature.

RD.. How path - et - ic to see your hate and fear driving you to death...!?! Man pull your self together and have the courage to face the returns of your deeds... Wars were always there in life whether were religious or not so stop doing it on your self... Beside learn to wish people well whether you agree or disagree with might you succeed in life rather than being a loser... by being a cowered... My posts were meant for the friendly people I had known for some time, whom I found they were full of compassion and not for black hearted one's like you who hate all God creations...

Throughgrace and through nature (for God has made them one economy and one identity in the humanity of Christ) Christ (whether passible on earth or impassible but living in His Church, His Sacraments, and His People) is an «ecological» influence if you like, which reaches, especially through us men, into every aspect of creation.

Like all spiritual creations, whether man or angel, our specific identity is not in ourselves or in the order of the created at all.

the point of this young man's video was to proclaim what Jesus did for you, whether you like it or not.

We bicker and argue over idiotic topic like whether a man can be with a man and whether or not there is an afterlife.

God could had it been both ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

God could had creation either ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

Sometimes I am tempted to make up some such activities, to see what happens (like the man who answered «Principal purpose of visit» when asked on a US immigration form whether he was concerned in plots to overthrow the government of the United States).

Like the doctrine of justification it destroys every false security and every false demand for it on the part of man, whether he seeks it in his good works or in his ascertainable knowledge.

You know those tests that determine whether you think more like a man or a woman?

The deal for Arsenal to get Pierre Emerick Aubameyang from Dortmund is dragging on and on as usual, just like the sale of Alexis Sanchez to Man United, and it will probably hinge on whether the Bundesliga club can get a suitable replacement in before the end of the transfer window.

If Arsenal start like the Man utd match then they have problem which dependant on whether Alexis will be fit or not.

I personally like the idea of Chambers there, he can man mark and intercept pretty well, but whether Wenger will gamble on him in the CL idk, I'm assuming Flamini is starting vs the Greeks.

• Whether Ed Woodward woke up that morning feeling like he was in a good place, like he was a tiger, grrrr, roar, come on, Ed, you're a hero, you're the man, you can do it.

Sure, you could gamble on boring things like the point spread or the game MVP — bets that can be based on stuff like «stats» and «logical reasoning» — but it's way more fun to risk large sums of money on the wholly unpredictable: the number of times the announcers say «12th Man,» the color of the postgame Gatorade shower, whether Michael Crabtree mentions Richard Sherman on Twitter.

Whether you believe the lack of big spending on transfers like we see all the time from our big rivals in the Premier League is down to the cautious approach of Arsene Wenger, the policy of the Arsenal board or because the man at the top silent Stan Kroenke wants it that way, the results are generally the same.

Whether you like him or not, Wenger is an extremely intelligent man and that can not be disputed.

But whether it is because of their failure to create much in front of goal, the concern about the fitness of Diego Costa or the struggle for form of his options in Falcao and Remy, it looks like Mourinho has had a late change of mind and is set to beat Man United to the transfer of Pedro Rodriguez from Barcelona, as reported by the Daily Mail.

The Napoli president seems like a deluded man who's hard to deal with, they managed to dupe PSG into over paying for Cavani and I don't think Wenger is after any Napoli players whether it be Higuain, Callejon or Isigne

Whether he will have games like this on a regular basis or he will miss chances like Dortmund and Spurs is yet to be found out, but i do enjoy the way the Man United boy raised with so much love is now scoring goals for Arsenal and mocking United at not giving him the chance to shine as a forward.

We need to show character like the one we showed against Chelsea and Man city... Cos records can just repeat itself... It's very difficult for Arsenal to beat United whether they're all injured or not

I do not know whether there is a problem because the English FA have been stronger critics of UEFA and FIFA corruption or whether it is just as simple as the fact that football is played in a more robust way in England than on the continent, but neither of these reasons is an excuse for the fact that Arsenal and the likes of Man City keep finding ourselves on the wrong end of decisions.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

I'm sure AKB's, AOB's, and some of us in the middle will all feel sad and shade a tear or two the day Wenger leaves, that's a guarantee because whether we like it or not the man has been a part of our lives (especially for those of us who breath Arsenal).

I still very much doubt whether that will happen, especially anytime soon, but even having a club legend like Adams working for Arsenal in any capacity would be fantastic and if it was going to be in a position where some of his famous leadership skills could rub off on the current players it would be as welcome as a cold beer to man just finishing a long trek through the Sahara desert.

«With the money that's out there in places like China, that will test whether he's a man who wants to win silverware in Europe or if the financial gains he's going to achieve in China is something that floats his boat.

If you ask most Arsenal fans whether the club could do with a defensive midfielder, be ready for a verbal hairdryer, because we have needed one for at least the last three years, But once again during the summer transfer window, the Gunners have been linked with every central midfielder out there but once again look like going into a campaign with Mikel Arteta as the main man.