Sentences with phrase «whether accommodating the employee»

Employers must assess each employee's needs individually to determine whether accommodating the employee would cause undue hardship.

Not exact matches

Innovative office design is implemented through all areas: from how comfortable a desk is to whether the employee lounge is laid out to accommodate both large groups and private conversations, from conference room adaptability to inspirational reception areas.

Sticking points for approving the ride - sharing services include how to craft new laws to properly insure Uber and Lyft drivers in case they are in an accident, whether employees should be subject to fingerprinting, and how to better accommodate disabled people.

Sticking points for approving the ride sharing services include how to craft new laws to properly insure Uber and Lyft drivers, in case they are in an accident, whether or not employees should be subject to fingerprinting, and how to better accommodate disabled people.

Whether accommodating an individual would constitute «undue hardship» is complex analysis, one component of which is whether the discriminating standard, in this case presumably that the potential employee not be a smoker, is a bona fides operational requiWhether accommodating an individual would constitute «undue hardship» is complex analysis, one component of which is whether the discriminating standard, in this case presumably that the potential employee not be a smoker, is a bona fides operational requiwhether the discriminating standard, in this case presumably that the potential employee not be a smoker, is a bona fides operational requirement.

A one - liner medical note, particularly when attempting to justify a long - term absence, does not provide enough information for an employer to assess whether it can accommodate an employee's return to work.

If the employee has permanent limitations related to the work injury, the employer has to decide whether they can accommodate the restrictions.

In an arbitration between the Corporation of Quinte West and CUPE, Local 759, (decision released on October 21, 2011), Arbitrator Paula Knopf considered whether an employer has an obligation to accommodate an employee who suffers from allergies that are caused, at least in part, by scented products in the workplace.

It may seem puzzling that a court can find an employer has breached its duty to accommodate but that the defence of undue hardship nonetheless applies, when the question was whether the employer accommodated the employee to the point of undue hardship.