The question is
whether black churches can continue to be the instruments of empowerment that they historically have been.
Not exact matches
I'm not a member of the Southern Baptist
Church, but if I were, my opinion would be as to
whether a
black man should be elected to the presidency is: does he / she have the qualifications: that is the most important question.
You will definately be able to tell
whether it is a «
Black Christian
Church», «White Christian
Church» or a «Latino Christian
Church» just by looking at the faces of the parishoners.
The controversy, however, is not over
whether Wright is a Christian but
whether he is right in saying, as Senator Obama has also said, that he represents the
black church and, by extension, the
black community.
Just curious,
whether you are white,
black, Asian, Hispanic or other, if the couple getting married isn't a member of the
church (or at least one of the couple) why would they even want to get married there anyway?
Whether one examines
church attendance, election results, rates of intermarriage, or attitudes about dating, one fact stands out: the American melting pot is alive and well for American
blacks, just as it was in the past for Italians, Jews, and Asians, to name just a few.
While I would agree that there is little grey area in choosing
whether to support victims or abusers, using a
black / white dichotomy for victims and abusers is too simplistic for the dynamics of dysfunctional or abusive
churches.
He said «And it's why [Perry's] comfortable in so many different settings,
whether it's a Catholic or a Hispanic or a
black church.»
«And it's why [Perry's] comfortable in so many different settings,
whether it's a Catholic or a Hispanic or a
black church.»
Added
black on top for a chic, modern look that works
whether you're headed to
church & brunch or a date night!