Whether the market goes up or down depends on
whether central bank policy is positive or negative for markets.
Not exact matches
He said the
central bank will be spending time on investigating
whether there is a better way to measure trend inflation than the core rate
policy makers follow now.
The question of
whether central banks can use monetary
policy to promote financial stability as well as price stability has re-emerged from time to time.
But investors and policymakers will comb over the Fed's
policy statement for clues about
whether the
central bank plans to raise rates more quickly than previously telegraphed.
The timing of Bernanke's easing raises the stakes for the Fed's four remaining
policy meetings this year as investors focus on
whether the
central bank will provide stimulus for 2013 to help the economy overcome the impact of the fiscal tightening due to take hold in January, said Vincent Reinhart, chief U.S. economist at Morgan Stanley.
Many are now talking about
whether the
central banks will change their
policies on quantitative easing.
In terms, I think of inflation and bond markets, it took six, seven, eight, maybe 10 years of high inflation in the 1970s before you had Paul Volcker brought in to say «enough is enough,» and then again
whether it's led by American monetary
policy but similar moves in Europe, obviously in the UK, a significant tightening of monetary
policy because people got fed up with inflation and I don't think that we are kind of yet at the point where real wages have been suppressed so much by that irritation that inflation is always running ahead, life is becoming more expensive, so we need the
central bank radically to change their
policy.
And
whether the
policies, which I was eluding to earlier, forces the
central banks to reverse course of normalization and taper,
whether it forces them to put into things such as helicopter money — Time will tell.
In this article we'll use forest fire management
policy as an analogy to discuss
whether market forces should be allowed to burst speculative bubbles, «clean the forest floor,» and quickly return the market to a natural state, or if governments and
central banks should try to «put fires out» in an effort to slowly deflate speculative bubbles which, if allowed to burst, might harm the broader economy.
Investors speculated
whether the more hawkish tone from other
central banks might spark a change in
policy by the Reserve
Bank of Australia (RBA).
Whether we have a
central bank or not is a lesser matter, but the current Fed has blown it royally, and is no example for what we should have for monetary
policy.
Senior deputy governor Carolyn Wilkins recently said that given continued and broadening growth, the
central bank would assess
whether the «considerable monetary
policy stimulus presently in place is still required.»
The monetarist prescription of keeping the money supply growing at a constant, non-inflationary rate —
whether this is achieved by deliberate
central bank policy or by some type of gold standard — will not fix the problem.
Every state,
whether real or virtual, can set up its own currency that's managed by its «
central bank» - using a format, for example, such as smart contracts, which analyse economic performance stats and use them to establish monetary
policy.