There is no point in predicting
whether certiorari will.
Not exact matches
Samuel Casey, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said in a statement: «We are disappointed by the Court of Appeals decision and, given the reasoning in the two concurring opinions, we are evaluating
whether and on what grounds our clients will be seeking
certiorari before the United States Supreme Court.»
See Scenic Am., Inc., v. Department of Transportation, No. 16 - 739 (Gorsuch, J., statement respecting the denial of
certiorari)(questioning
whether deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), is owed to an agency's interpretation of contractual terms); see also Garco Constr., Inc. v. Speer, No. 17 - 225 (Thomas, J., dissenting from the denial of
certiorari, joined by Gorsuch, J.)(encouraging the Court to overrule Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997), and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410 (1945)-RRB-.
[Footnote 1] We granted
certiorari to determine
whether the actions of the Illinois Supreme Court constituted improper judicial interference with decisions of the highest authorities of a hierarchical church in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
We granted
certiorari, 510 U. S. 1068 (1994), to consider
whether Oregon's limited judicial review of the size of punitive damages awards is consistent with our decision in Has lip.
The disagreement framed by the case over
whether the legal rule must be published or may be conveyed less formally is clear;
certiorari should be granted here to decide the issue.
Justice Kennedy was talking about how law review case comments generally come out too late to be of use to the Court (especially in the context of deciding
whether to grant
certiorari in a case).
The Court granted
certiorari to review
whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's practice of determining the patentability of...
The US Supreme Court is currently considering
whether to grant
certiorari and hear this case.
On Aug. 19, Argentina filed petition for a writ of
certiorari, urging the justices to settle what it described as a significant split among circuit courts regarding
whether an arbitration tribunal's «manifest disregard of the law» provides a sufficient basis for federal courts to undo that tribunal's rulings.
The Court granted
certiorari to review
whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's practice of determining the patentability of some, but not all, claims challenged in a petition for inter partes review violates the America Invents Act.
The Supreme Court granted
certiorari on
whether RICO can be applied extraterritorially.
The court had granted
certiorari to resolve a division among lower courts
whether police routinely may extend an otherwise completed traffic stop, absent reasonable suspicion, in order to conduct a dog sniff.
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court granted
certiorari to resolve
whether bankruptcy judges have discretion under Bankruptcy Code section 330 (a) to award bankruptcy attorneys fees and costs for defending fees / expenses which are the subject of fee applications for «core» fees.
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, the United States Supreme Court granted
certiorari from the Tenth Circuit's decision in Marx v. General Revenue Corp., U.S. No. 11 - 1175, to determine
whether a prevailing defendant can be awarded routine costs (not attorney's fees) against a losing plaintiff in a Fair Debt Collection Practice Act (FDCPA) case where the plaintiff was found to have brought the suit in good faith.
On January 13, 2017, the Supreme Court granted
certiorari in Kokesh v. Securities and Exchange Commission (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017)(No. 16 - 529) to determine
whether disgorgement claims are subject to the five - year statute of...