But if school - level flexibility is essential, we should stoutly defend it for all schools —
whether charters educate 10, 50, or 100 percent of students.
Not exact matches
Points of contention concern funding levels and
whether charter schools serve a proportionate share of children who are expensive to
educate, especially children with learning disabilities.
If you see education reform as a social justice or civil rights crusade, you will care mightily about
whether every
charter is
educating its share of kids with disabilities and
whether enough «people of color» are running these schools.
«
Whether a teacher works in a traditional,
charter, virtual or private school, they need the peace - of - mind of solid protection so that they can focus on
educating children,» said Beckner.
New Jersey's ongoing debate about
whether traditional public schools or
charters do a better job
educating students got some provocative new data yesterday, courtesy of a study from Stanford University that came down on the side of the
charters — particularly in Newark's embattled school district.
It is not about
whether charter schools are good or that
charter schools are successfully
educating their students.
Local school districts have no say in
whether charter schools are created, where they are located, which children they
educate or refuse to
educate, nor do local boards of education have control over any other
charter school policy or practice.
Other questions raised by QUEST include
whether charter schools will be required to increase programming for students with higher needs and English Language Learners so that they take in an equal share of these more costly - to -
educate demographics.
They decided, with no educational data to back their decisions, that
charter schools, regardless of
whether they worked for children or not,
whether they served America's need for an
educated populous or not, would become stand - alone schools that could be run with little accountability, certification, or even democratically elected boards.