When Gort first visited in 1951, it spent little effort on climate change issues, focusing on other aspects of our planet instead: Gort returned in 2012 to answer puny human climatologist questions about
whether climate change caused particular weather phenomena by making an obvious point: rather than struggle with theoretical analysis, you can simply use your Climate Changeometer to remove all the excess greenhouse gases and aerosols above natural levels and then measure the outcome.
When the weather is unseasonably hot or cold, Americans across the political spectrum have even stronger views about
whether climate change caused by human activity is a reality or not.
Not exact matches
The president of Kinder Morgan Canada, Ian Anderson, recently claimed he is not smart enough to know
whether human activity — i.e. the fossil fuel industry —
causes climate change.
I really don't see what he gains from being indifferent and idiotic about the issue, but for the mere fact he can't make up his mind
whether humans are a
cause behind global
climate changes makes me think this guy isn't fit to run the country.
The question of
whether or not humans
cause climate change matters because for many people an answer of «no» will remove the need to act, and even if the answer is «yes» it helps determine who should pay.
Therefore, people who find # 1 absurd can determine
whether or not we should do anything about
climate change by determining
whether or not humans are
causing it.
«I do not believe that human activity is
causing these dramatic
changes to our
climate the way these scientists are portraying it,» the first term senator said Sunday on ABC «This Week,» after being asked by ABC News» Jon Karl
whether humans were contributing to the heating up of the planet.
«Identifying which of these candidate genes actually
causes variation in responses to cold snaps will give us the potential to understand
whether evolution to
climate change can occur in both wild and domesticated animals, allowing us to better predict which species or breeds will be «winners» and «losers» and to better mitigate the effects of anthropogenic
climate change on a wide range of organisms from beneficial pollinators to invasive pests,» said Theodore Morgan an associate professor of evolutionary genetics in the Division of Biology at Kansas State University and senior author of the study.
Whether or not farmers agree about the
causes or even existence of
climate change, researchers agree that farmers still have to prepare their farms for the consequences of rising temperatures, increased atmospheric CO2 and more extreme weather events.
They found a strong positive relationship between trust in specific groups and
whether they agreed that human activity is
causing climate change.
Alaskan scientists aren't the only ones who have noticed:
Climate change activists have already adopted the walrus's
cause, and the U.S. Interior Department is now deciding
whether to list the walrus as endangered species.
Dear EarthTalk: Has anyone been tracking
whether climate change is
causing more loss of human life as it gets more pronounced?
An emphatic 2008 report by economist Ross Garnaut, a former global warming agnostic who became, in his own words, «a late - life convert» to the green
cause, did much to dispel any lingering questions among most Australians about
whether the threat of
climate change was real.
While some may see evidence of rapid glacier thinning in the past and again today as evidence that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet is nearing a collapse driven by human -
caused climate change, Steig said at this point, scientists just don't know
whether that is the case.
The researchers asked the students
whether they believed that humans are
causing climate change, and they also had the students complete a test intended to reveal their automatic, instinctual preferences toward the politicians.
Nowadays, there is a raging debate over
whether climate change, and the overall rise in global temperature it is supposed to bring, will
cause tropical cyclones to develop more often and become more powerful in the future.
A quarter of producers said they believed
climate change was
caused mostly by natural shifts in the environment, and 31 percent said there was not enough evidence to determine
whether climate change was happening or not.
Associate professor of natural resource social science Linda Prokopy and fellow researchers surveyed 6,795 people in the agricultural sector in 2011 - 2012 to determine their beliefs about
climate change and
whether variation in the
climate is triggered by human activities, natural
causes or an equal combination of both.
However, the data so far is not sufficient to say
whether the storm activity
changes are
caused by
climate change — this has to be investigated further.»
The work covered just one small part of Europe, and the authors could not explain what might be
causing the drop,
whether climate change, habitat destruction or something else.
It is not clear
whether or not Romney accepts the science on the pace and
causes of
climate change, but he promises to amend the Clean Air Act to specifically exclude regulation of carbon emissions.
Bennett: When you say an open mind, you mean you're just not sure
whether human activity
causes climate change?
The acknowledged role of sunspots and cosmic rays in forming clouds has been fertile ground for
climate deniers, who have cast doubt on
whether anthropogenic
climate change (in other words,
change caused by humans) is occurring at all.
They are designed to put senators on the record on
whether climate change is real and human -
caused.
The poll did not ask respondents
whether climate change is
caused by people.
Indeed, a recent Pew poll shows that there is a substantial and growing amount of public disagreement about basic scientific facts, including human evolution, the safety of vaccines and
whether or not human -
caused climate change is real and happening.
37 - percentage point gap over
whether climate change is mostly
caused by human activity — 87 % of AAAS scientists say it is, while 50 % of the public does.
Regardless of
whether participants said they accepted that human activity
caused climate change, most recognized that scientists expect
climate change to create serious environmental dangers, including increased coastal flooding.
Such mixed results aren't unusual in attribution science, which seeks to look for the
causes,
whether climate change or natural fluctuations, that
change the odds of extreme weather events.
Through many of those years, Taylor was a frequent spokesperson for those scientists who regularly challenged
whether climate change is real, human -
caused, or, in either event, worth worrying about or doing anything to address.
Not only do pupils understand the
causes and effects, they examine evidence as to
whether or not
climate change is real or a hoax.
I have a question for you — as you know, «
climate change» is happening...
whether human
caused or not, it certainly feels like we are seeing more extreme weathers of late.
Drawing on everything from 18th - century rococo to 1970s punk, her recent work shows images of people surviving after civilizations collapse, though the nature of the
cause is unclear,
whether from
climate change, social injustice or financial meltdown.
«The approaches used in detection and attribution research described above can not fully account for all uncertainties, and thus ultimately expert judgement is required to give a calibrated assessment of
whether a specific
cause is responsible for a given
climate change.
RE # 77 & «The answer to the oft - asked question of
whether an event is
caused by
climate change is that it is the wrong question.
«The answer to the oft - asked question of
whether an event is
caused by
climate change is that it is the wrong question.
We can argue about how to deal with manmade
climate change and we can argue about how bad the impacts will be but arguing about
whether there is global warming or
whether humans are
causing it is, quite frankly, absurd.
How is your question relevant to the issue of
whether humans are
causing climate change IN ADDITION to the natural
changes?
Thus, the title of the USF press release, «Frogs Getting Sick from
Climate Change,» is accurate in suggesting that climate change caused increased frog infection and infection - induced mortality, whether one interprets «climate change» as referring to the short - term temperature shifts investigated by our experiments, or to increased temperature variability caused by global climate
Climate Change,» is accurate in suggesting that climate change caused increased frog infection and infection - induced mortality, whether one interprets «climate change» as referring to the short - term temperature shifts investigated by our experiments, or to increased temperature variability caused by global climate c
Change,» is accurate in suggesting that
climate change caused increased frog infection and infection - induced mortality, whether one interprets «climate change» as referring to the short - term temperature shifts investigated by our experiments, or to increased temperature variability caused by global climate
climate change caused increased frog infection and infection - induced mortality, whether one interprets «climate change» as referring to the short - term temperature shifts investigated by our experiments, or to increased temperature variability caused by global climate c
change caused increased frog infection and infection - induced mortality,
whether one interprets «
climate change» as referring to the short - term temperature shifts investigated by our experiments, or to increased temperature variability caused by global climate
climate change» as referring to the short - term temperature shifts investigated by our experiments, or to increased temperature variability caused by global climate c
change» as referring to the short - term temperature shifts investigated by our experiments, or to increased temperature variability
caused by global
climate climate changechange.
Also, the brief period I spent scanning abstracts [no time this week to read papers] indicates a difference of opinion suggesting
whether there is a correlation between clouds and CRF (including a no by Balling and Cerveny Theoretical and Applied Climatology 75:3 - 4 pp. 225 - 231 — which may be a good indicator as there was a skeptic flurry last year over connecting CRF to
climate as another try at natural
causes being responsible for recent
climate change).
Climate change is
causing drought, inclement
whether, and sea level rise.
The issue of
whether or not
climate change is happening, and determining the
cause, is pure science with an immutable truth behind it.
While statistical studies document a relationship between
climate variability and conflict, there remains much disagreement about
whether climate change directly
causes violent conflicts.
The issue today is
whether we will trigger tipping points that
cause climate change to accelerate beyond our control.
Public opinion on
climate change —
whether it is «happening,» is «human
caused,» etc. — didn't move an inch at all during that time.
But researchers don't know what exactly is
causing this shift in the Hadley cell,
whether it's explicitly due to human - induced
climate change and how long the shift may last.
There are divergent views on
whether the recent droughts affecting the tornado states were
caused by
climate change — although
climate models do predict more droughts in central North America, which is often a vast playpen of deadly twisters.
But mainstream scientists don't waste their time arguing about
whether or not humans are
causing climate change.
Everyone agrees that
climate changes; the argument is about what
causes it and
whether or not humans play any or a significant role in recent
changes.
«I'm saying we need to acknowledge that and rethink how we're going to deal with the risks from future
climate change whether it's
caused by humans or natural processes,» said Curry.