From a European perspective it's not really sure
whether continued warm water transport to the north would actually count as good news.
Since Callendar (1938), great progress has been made in understanding the past changes in Earth's climate, and
whether continued warming is beneficial or not.
Not exact matches
The loss may be accelerating: since 2006,
warm summers have caused levels to rise by 0.75 millimetres per year, though van den Broeke says we can't be sure
whether this trend will
continue (Science, DOI: 10.1126 / science.1178176).
Unfortunately, as monitoring efforts
continue, we may see these pretty patterns cut short:
warming temperatures could deplete phytoplankton populations, which means less fish, squid, and krill for the birds to feast on, and could affect
whether sooty shearwaters have enough energy to make it back to their New Zealand breeding grounds.
Forests are also vulnerable to changes in climate, leading scientists to explore
whether they can
continue their sequestering magic in a
warming world.
Thus as a practical matter, it doesn't really matter
whether the inertia is climatic or societal or technological or economic because the globe will
continue to
warm under all realistic scenarios (what we do have a possible control over is the magnitude of that
warming).
William M. Gray wrote... I judge our present global ocean circulation to be similar to that of the period of the early 1940s when the globe had shown great
warming since 1910, and there was concern as to
whether this 1910 - 1940 global
warming would
continue.
In the paper Gray makes many extravagant claims about how supposed changes in the THC accounted for various 20th century climate changes («I judge our present global ocean circulation conditions to be similar to that of the period of the early 1940s when the globe had shown great
warming since 1910, and there was concern as to
whether this 1910 - 1940 global
warming would
continue.
Unlike some other scientists, Mulvaney declined to comment on
whether the
warming will
continue.
Whether by
warming your heart or making you laugh, you can at least find a reason to...
Continue reading →
We don't know
whether or not global
warming is actually dangerous, but we should lower emissions rather than
continue our current habits in hopes that things will turn out alright.
No trend
continues forever, including
warming,
whether anthropogenic or not.
They will
continue to rise regardless of
whether we attempt to do anything about recent
warming.
Yet the world is
warming,
whether or not another Katrina happens this season is not as solid as current well documented
warming trends, which
continue to defy «natural variabilty» temperature fluctuations.
Folks can
continue arguing about
whether global
warming is a significant factor intensifying Western wildfires or can dig in to end irrational incentives fostering development in fire - prone «red zones.»
It seems somewhat disingenuous for the book's authors to
continue assert that there is an ongoing debate regarding
whether global
warming is caused by humans, and then use pre-1998 references to make this case.
Unfortunately, various commentators
continue to try and blame the
warming signal on natural and cyclic variability,
whether it's solar cycles, the AMO, or El Nino.
by Chris White Daily Caller The ExxonMobil probes are meant to determine
whether the company decided to
continue pulling oil out of the ground despite acknowledging global
warming is a growing issue, the leader of the investigation told reporters Friday.
The mantra goes that when atmospheric CO2 peaks at whatever value,
whether it's 500ppm or 1000ppm
warming will
continue long after that.
(September 2, 2011) CERN experiment overturns global -
warming orthodoxy The 20 - year - long global
warming debate is in its final stages, the controversy having been settled over
whether manmade causes such as carbon dioxide or natural causes such as the Sun dominate climate...
Continue reading →
At the moment, the oceans are absorbing about a third of the carbon dioxide we are emitting, but scientists are unclear
whether it will
continue to do so in the future, as the oceans become
warmer and more acidic.
To those of us who have dared to question on scientific and economic grounds the official story on global
warming, it is a
continuing surprise that there is so little concern about
whether or not that story is objectively true... The herd and the hive do not care.
Inherent in the question is that it's a test of
whether a pre-1997
warming trend has
continued past 1997.
When we ask
whether 1970 - 1997
warming has
continued past 1997 we should be asking
whether the 1970 - 1997 trend has
continued, not
whether temperature has increased since 1997.
Surely it's the longterm trend that defines
whether warming continues, not the specific path temperature took.»
I have no idea as to
whether the globe will
continue to
warm or cool or bump around at the current temperatures tonyb
Whether CO2 levels are high or low, as long as we are in an interglacial period it seems entirely reasonable that the oceans will
continue to
warm.
The world may have
warmed, but we still don't know if, and by how much it will
continue to
warm, and
whether or not any future
warming will be a net beneficial or catastrophic.
It is unclear
whether this
warm state
continues, with the persistance of the long La Niña from late 1998 until early 2001.
An assessment of
whether or not there was a meaningful slowdown or «hiatus» in global
warming, was recently discussed by Tamino...
Continue reading →
In the mean time, I shall
continue to visit your site as I am trying to get my mind «up to speed» on the details of «global
warming» predictions — and do some bush league predictions of my own (as I enjoy «computer modeling» real systems,
whether I am good at it or not).
Personally, I do not know
whether the earth is going to
continue to
warm, or that having reached a peak in 1998, we are at the start of a cooling cycle that will last several decades or more.
An example of an explicit endorsement without quantification would be «while anthropogenic forcings
continue to rise, combined natural forcings are negative over recent times, and internal variability is small» from which it is readilly deduced that anthropogenic factors are the primary cause of recent
warming, without being able to quantify
whether they contribute 55 % or 110 %, or something in between.
While I am pretty sure IPCC won't repeat the silly mistake of projecting global
warming of 0.2 C per decade for the next two decades (as it did in AR4), it will be interesting to see
whether or not IPCC modifies its AR5 report to include the possibility of
continued global cooling over the next two or three decades despite unabated human GHG emissions and concentrations expected to reach new record levels.
The letters were submitted to the Department of the Interior as the agency faces a court - imposed deadline next week on
whether polar bears, which are acutely imperiled by global
warming, should
continue to be classified merely as «threatened» or given maximum protection as «endangered.»
It is not yet clear
whether this linearity will
continue: but, if it does, all of the IPCC's predictions (or, if you prefer, «projections») of future global
warming will require substantial downward adjustment on this ground alone.
But of course, these so - called «skeptics» will
continue to blather on endlessly about: 1)
whether the oceans are
warming or 2) that the effects will be «harmless».
Whether from ignorance or mendacity, climate activists
continue to ignore climate scientists» work about the pause in
warming since roughly 1998.
An important question is
whether the lack of
continued global
warming in recent years will be temporary, or is this further evidence that the climate system is more complex than concluded in such assessments as provided by the IPCC.
The Washington Post ran an article on September 17 on the controversy over
whether Pat Michaels, long - time voice of the global
warming denial machine, was entitled to
continue to identify himself as the Virginia State Climatologist.