It's also unclear
whether federal intervention to raise teacher pay is desirable, would have a positive effect on retention, and would benefit student learning.
Asked
whether federal intervention is needed...
Not exact matches
Current right - wing mythology has it that bad banking is always the result of government
intervention,
whether from the
Federal Reserve or meddling liberals in Congress.
The unprecedented
federal intervention into local schools has been welcomed by some cash - strapped states, but it's also meeting resistance from high - achievers like Minnesota and Massachusetts, which wonder
whether the second round of Race to the Top is even worth winning.
The reasoning behind this proposition is that: A) EBHV programs are designed to serve women categorized as «at - risk» due to a variety of demographic factors, including single - parent household status, age at time of first pregnancy, being categorically undereducated, under or unemployed, and meeting
federal standards of living at or below the poverty line; B) these programs serve women during pregnancy and / or shortly after the birth of their children, offering an excellent chance for the early prevention of trauma exposure; and C)
intervention services are provided at the same times that attachment (
whether secure or insecure) is being developed between mothers and children, providing the opportunity that generational risk may be mitigated.
In New Zealand, recent strengthening of the Māori health workforce has led to a number of successes:
interventions led by, focused on, and targeted to Māori; consistent investment in Māori health over a prolonged period; and an emphasis on the development of dual cultural and clinical competencies.14 In the United States, successful Native American health service development in the early 1990s appears to have been shaped by
federal government administration, the separation of the Indian Health Service from other Native American affairs, and provision of an integrated health service.15 In both countries, recent reductions in overall death rates for indigenous people have been noted; in the US this relates to injury prevention, whereas in NZ it relates to fewer deaths due to circulatory conditions.16 Although it is not known
whether improved health services for indigenous peoples in the US and NZ have a causal relationship with decreased mortality, the two appear to «travel together» well.