Sentences with phrase «whether god exists»

Humanists are agnostic because they think that we can not know whether God exists or not.

Students act as lawyers and jury members to decide whether God exists or does not exist.

This is a short series of lessons to evaluate whether God exists or not by comparing the creation stories with the Big Bnag theory and Evolution.

At this juncture, inconsolable Katherine starts yearning to return home to England and even questions whether God exists.

Whether God exists or not is a question about which science is neutral.»

Science does not have a test for whether God exists or had a role in planning how life unfolded.»

Do you find yourself playing Dr. Phil to your increasingly curious child, fielding questions about tough topics like whether God exists or why some people are fat?

3 If in the moment of beginning his proof it is not absolutely undetermined whether the God exists or not, he does not prove it; and if it is thus undetermined in the beginning he will never come to begin, partly from fear of failure, since the God perhaps does not exist, and partly because he has nothing with which to begin.

That means that it can not be a factual question whether God exists.

It seems to me that whether God exists or not is a question not dependent on what people, intelligent or not, believe.

in other words, people can argue about the details of their religious beliefs, but it boils down to whether god exists or not.

Thus Buchler says that «the question whether God exists or does not is a symptom of deficiency in the categorial equipment of a metaphysics» (MNC 8).

You could remodel that argument to say no one knows whether God exists (or gods).

Presumably including the philosophy of science in his general use of the word «science» he says: «Until now science hasn't been able to prove whether God exists or not - whatever God may be.

I can understand it being subjective if the notion of whether God exists or not is subjective.

People have debated for centuries about whether God exists or not and I doubt if there will be any undisputable objective conclusion that all can agree on anytime soon about that.

None of that proves whether either one actually existed, or, for that matter, whether a god exists.

whether God exists or not..

I don't know whether god exists or not.

I no longer know whether God exists.

And he does not know whether God exists or not, else he would have proved that «IT» does not exists.

Although I originally saw similarities in how I believed in the existence of God and the existence of you despite lack of tangible evidence, I don't know that consistency is necessary in how I assess whether you exist and whether God exists.

The doubter, then, who claims to have at his disposal a criterion by which he can prove whether God exists or not, will never see miracles; miracles can be seen only by the doubter who despairs of his own strength and ability to see God if God does not reveal Himself, but who is ready to let God speak to him.

I» â $ ™ m not sure how that whole causal agent tangent got going... or how it relates to whether God exists.

because we believe that ideas are important, whether god exists or not.

Satan has no more effective weapon in his arsenal that to make us question — not so much whether God exists, but whether God is really good.

nah: «Your own ignorance of the subject has no bearing on whether a god exists.»

Why is it not acceptable to simply concede that I don't know whether a god exists or not, when I've seen no evidence to show there is one nor have I seen any proof there isn't one?

It doesn't matter whether god exists or not.

Therefore, to decide accurately whether God exists may require a more whole - person response, rather than just a mind or language game «in the head.»

None of this has anything to do with whether any god exists.

This is indeed a great story and breakthrough and it is a moment of rejoicing but not for the believers but rather for the Atheists and Agnostics for getting closer to the answer of whether God exists and whether there is a Supreme Being!

It is not simply a matter of debating whether God exists or not, for this begs the basic question of what is meant by the word «God».

Your claim is that you have to look in every corner of the universe in order to know whether God exists or not then how did you come to the conclusion that God exists yourself?

People can debate back and forth until the end of time whether God exists, however one can not deny His existence when they have felt Him touch their hearts.

a) if there is life after death in the way I used to envision it, b) whether God exists in an objective, verifiable sense (don't know how I'd ever prove such an ephemeral, numinous ideal in words anyway) c) whether I or anyone else is «saved.»

Bell's belief that God does / not does exisit does nothing to effect whether God exists.

We don't say there are six types of Theists, we focus on the Religions, and that is what is missing — a modern Religion / Belief system for Atheists — as Atheism does not mean without rules, just about whether God exists or not.

Just as astronomers must use deductive reasoning to determine whether something exist, so likewise must anyone regarding whether God exists.

Your friend might say: «Maybe you can not check experientially whether God exists or not, but we can try to check the value of my insights indirectly.

I've already conceded that I can not possess actual knowledge of whether God exists, why is this same simple and factual concession so difficult for theists?

Kumail is actually an agnostic, claiming not to know whether God exists, but contemptuously spitting out the word «Pakistan» in a climactic confrontation with his father, where he lays out his refusal to pretend to inhabit Pakistan whilst living in Chicago.

That doesn't mean a thing, There's no evidence either way on whether God exists or not.

It makes absolutely no statement on whether your god exists, or it's motivations.

Maybe there is a third possibility to whether God exists or not, however we on our pale blue dot have no mechanism to comprehend it.

Though they disagree on whether God exists, premoderns and postmoderns share the major premise that knowing requires His existence.

I think 2 different people could each read the bible, koran or torah or any other religious based guidebook and depending on what they have experienced in life come to 2 absolutely different opinions on whether God exists or not.

I am happy that the writer had the choices that she did... She is also free to decide whether or not she is a Catholic... She however, took an available medication for a health problem... most Catholic facilities recognize such health problems and allow for that treatment... I am completly puzzled, though, that she would not want other Catholics to be able to choose differently than she did... for those people who wish to use contraceptive services and medication, options are open to them... I am not Catholic, did not grow up in a faith based family, and don't know whether a God exists or not... However, to leave a relgious group with no option but to contradict its own tenets is an attempt by those who don't believe in those tenents to mock them, certainly, but more to erode them... this seems the aim of many and when those folks operate from inside the government... that intrusion is an overreach of the govenrment...

If it's the matter of god, then you're dealing with something other than atheism considering atheism focuses on religion, not the matter of whether god exists or not.

«I do not know whether God exists but I'm inclined to be skeptical.»