Sentences with phrase «whether homosexual»

The dating site offers to hook up services for all the genders; whether homosexual, gay lesbian, bisexuals or even homosexuals; all will find their like - minded partners on the sex dating website.

The dating site offers to hook up services for all the genders; whether homosexual, gay lesbian, bisexuals or even homosexuals; all will find their like - minded partners on the sex dating websiteThe hooking up website claims over 42 million subscribers of mixed races whether Latinos, African Americans or even Asians.

Given this general agreement, scholars do differ as to whether homosexual activity actually played any role in the story at all.

Add to this that it is generally admitted that some seminaries and houses of formation did not, over an extended period of time, teach what the Church teaches about sexual morality, whether homosexual or heterosexual.

But our specific question today is whether homosexual actions in general and as such are expressions of idolatry.

In homosexual behavior the bodily joining of their practitioners, whether homosexual or heterosexual, does not unite them biologically as one complete procreative organism.

And so it really comes down to whether homosexual behavior is sinful.

I would be happy to debate the question as to whether homosexual activity is in itself inherently sinful, but this was not my statement as you suggest.

Americans were equally split on whether homosexual relationships between adults are wrong, with 44 percent saying yes and 46 percent saying no.

It only makes it all the more urgent for young people to be told the truth that sexual promiscuity, whether homosexual or heterosexual, may endanger their lives, that condoms are by no means a foolproof way to avoid that risk, and that chastity is the best defense.

Mr. Anderson protests that sexual promiscuity of any sort, whether homosexual or heterosexual, puts people at risk.

Both sides are fighting the battle on the question of whether homosexuals are «wired» for homosexuality, that is, whether there is an intrinsic neurochemical basis for sexual orientation.

When Ronald Reagan was asked whether homosexuals should be barred from public office in the United States, he replied jokingly that they should certainly «be barred from the department of beaches and parks.»

What does that have to do with whether homosexuals can also be encouraged to live in stable situations?

The answers will also be relevant for a preliminary reference that the Dutch Counscil of State has made in a few asylum cases regarding the interpretation of article 9 of the Directive, in particular whether homosexuals can be ascribed as «a social group» in the sense of the provision, and whether it can be expected from them «to conceal some homosexual activities».

Not exact matches

I think you will find that part of the ostracization has nothing to do with whether or not pastors or church members will allow participating homosexuals to attend their churches.

The question is whether those who would condemn homosexual acts should be able to force their views of Scripture on those who disagree any more than those who affirm gay relationships should be able to force their view of Scripture on those opposed.

you guys know, don't you, that there are theological discussions with biblical scholars on both sides of the debate on whether the bible condemns homosexuality and homosexual behavior?

«Regarding homosexuals, it went so far as to pose the question whether the church could accept and value their sexual orientation without compromising Catholic doctrine,» said John Thavis, a former Rome bureau chief for Catholic News Service.

For some time he had mused publicly about whether we might not come to see monogamous homosexual relationships in a different light.

She had apparently got to the point where she honestly did not know that a child is the natural fruit of a union between a man and a woman: in her understanding «sex» is something done for pleasure, according to one's desires, whether lesbian or homosexual or whatever, and procreation an entirely different matter connected with options presented at various times, possibly involving in - vitro fertilization and test - tubes.

A person's sexuality — whether heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual — is a very deep biological piece of who that person is as an individual.

Though I am encouraged that Hill sees potential hazards in the use of terms like «gay Christian» and «homosexual Christian,» he, along with Gonnerman and Tushnet, may not sufficiently recognize the problems with describing or defining a person in terms of his or her affective desire for the same sex (whether that desire is relational, romantic, or sexual), in place of the clear definition of our sexual identity revealed to us by Scripture and the Church.

Love the fact that people give sexual expression to «who they really are»» whether heterosexual or homosexual» but hate these men for belonging to an institution that teaches that sexual expression is not necessary to being who you really are.

The first and most obvious is that what he has to say captures so well the essence of the revisionist argument, and second it makes clear that the argument of the revisionists is the same whether they are speaking of heterosexual or homosexual relations.

The topic of debate shifted to homosexuality when Mr Schofield asked Mrs Williams whether she would encourage someone identifying as homosexual to seek help.

A Christian from South Yorkshire who was ejected from his university course after being accused of make derogatory comments about homosexuals may learn on Friday whether his High Court battle has been successful.

And I'm not interested in entering into a debate on the interpretation of scripture and whether or not God dislikes homosexual behavior.

The question before us was whether the states would be obliged to honor the marriage of homosexual couples if the courts in Hawaii delivered to the country that unsolicited gift.

I agree with what you have written from the biblical perspective and would like to take it further in the sense that that we are all sinners whether fornicators liars homosexuals the difference is that if we decide to follow Jesus we not only repent of our sin but we turn away from continuing to sin Remenber the woman caught in adultery Jesus said go and sin no more that applys to all of us that have accepted Jesus.But unless we die to our desires we cant live for him.brentnz

Personally, I find it demeaning for conversations to label me and ask whether I choose heterosexual activity, homosexual activity, or chastity.

Whether it is that teenage girl, or that homosexual, or that drug addict, or a struggle with pornography, or materialism and greed, or lying, or stealing, or overeating.

And there is an important point - belief is up to individual interpretation, and since God gave us free will and intelligent brains to chose our interpretation, it is up to us whether we take His will to mean that we must love and serve others or to mean that, for example, if you divorce or are homosexual you will burn in enternal anguish in Hell.

It is not clear whether I Corinthians 6:9 and I Timothy 1:10 refer to the «passive» and «active» partners in homosexual relationships, or to homosexual and heterosexual male prostitutes.

Even today when pressures such as «outing» seek to enforce a gay identity on all homosexuals, many of them take the view that homosexuality is just one facet of their identity - whether an advantage, or a curse, or simply a slightly awkward fact about themselves - which has little bearing on the rest of their lives outside the bedroom.

He adamantly opposed any manifestations of genital sexuality, whether heterosexual or homosexual.

Minors do not have the capacity to consent to sexual contact with adults, whether in the heterosexual or homosexual context.

Whether killing people for homosexual behavior can be justified in terms of the contribution it makes to the common good or not is a secular civil judgment call.

Caring in tone, the film is devoid of egregious polemic, whether pro or con current homosexual activisms.

Social classification both creates the homosexual phenomenon and contains the evaluative frameworks by which it is judged, whether as deviant, tolerable, approvable or admirable.

The basis for deciding whether one is a homosexual person is the erotic preference for partners of the same sex.

«Christians,» they said, «must re-think the usual position that has turned homosexuals into modern day lepers» and «homosexual acts should be judged in each individual instance by whether the participants were expressing genuine love or simply «using» each other for selfish purposes (New York Times 20 November 1967 p. 1).

The history of the church is largely one of exclusion of those who are practicing homosexuals, whether that refers to «one night stands» or lasting loving relationships.

I don't care what your stance is on homosexual marriage, gay rights, or whether or not same - sex relationships are sinful, everybody should be able to agree that what «Grace» University is doing is certainly NOT gracious.

So, also, we might well wonder whether or not «the homosexual problem» could be rooted in a homophobia frequently experienced by heterosexuals.

Here homosexuals may ask themselves whether their homosexuality is to be placed in the service of God through the establishment of a committed and enduring relationship.

Whether legal rights concerning homosexual parenting and adoption are extended or limited, it is also clear that LGBT activists will use homosexual marriage as a Trojan horse in their greater efforts to deny natural sexuality, to erase sexual differences and replace them with orientations that make it possible to leave behind the «straitjacket of nature» and to pursue the destruction of the heterosexual foundations of our society.

Over the past ten years, several institutes that study public opinion have regularly asked representative samples of the population of those over eighteen years of age whether they favored or opposed homosexual marriage and adoption of children by same - sex couples.

There is no question of denying the suffering experienced by homosexual couples, whether male or female, owing to their infertility — a suffering they share with heterosexual couples who can not procreate.

And this is true for all couples, heterosexual as well as homosexual, whether the couples are married or not.