Sentences with phrase «whether in at least some cases»

At times, people have questioned whether in at least some cases, parties should be able to appeal prothonotary decisions directly to the Federal Court of Appeal, rather than first to a single judge of the Federal Court.

Not exact matches

In the case where your loan is investing in growth, the question will always be whether or not the growth will outpace (or at least eventually outweigh) the effective interest ratIn the case where your loan is investing in growth, the question will always be whether or not the growth will outpace (or at least eventually outweigh) the effective interest ratin growth, the question will always be whether or not the growth will outpace (or at least eventually outweigh) the effective interest rate.

US District Judge Mark Goldsmith had already issued a 14 day stay of removal on June 22nd for at least 114 mostly Christian Iraqis detained in the Detroit area, saying he needed time to work out whether he has jurisdiction over the case.

Whether we share this hope or not, let us at least admit that in this case the artists have proved the best expositors of the Bible.

Now, if it is possible for A to completely determine all of the activities of B even in the case where B is making maximum effort to determine its activities for itself, then whether or not A does in fact do so, there is at least a possible world (W) in which A does just that.

One of the older issues within this topic is whether modern «republicanism» (small R) has roots in orthodox forms of Christianity, at least in some important cases, or if it is primarily a product of irreligious and / or unorthodox philosophies.

It is precisely because of the particular shape of the Christ - event as Paul understands it — as a gift (1:6, 15) given without regard for its recipients» worth, status, honor, or cultural capital, whether Jewish or pagan (1:14 - 15; 6:15), delivering them from enslavement to cosmic powers (4:1 - 7)-- that Paul deems circumcision unnecessary and, in the Galatians» case, at least, positively forbidden (5:4).

Whether nonviolent resistance can always overcome aggression and whether its cost in suffering and death will in every case be less than that of war is difficult to say, but at least it can not be said that pacifism is merely a policy of capituWhether nonviolent resistance can always overcome aggression and whether its cost in suffering and death will in every case be less than that of war is difficult to say, but at least it can not be said that pacifism is merely a policy of capituwhether its cost in suffering and death will in every case be less than that of war is difficult to say, but at least it can not be said that pacifism is merely a policy of capitulation.

Whether this is motivational genius (sacrificing one player as an example to the rest of the team), petty caprice (for some perceived slight or offence) or both isn't really the point, and in Berbatov's case there is at least something of a footballing excuse.

Whether or not you overtly oppose any type of spanking, support it in very limited cases, or like many parents, publicly decry its use but privately have used it at least once on a defiant or out - of - control child, the controversy surrounding it isn't likely to end for generations to come.

In every case, at least one person (usually the father) was present to assist, and in most cases there was also another woman present, whether her mom or a frienIn every case, at least one person (usually the father) was present to assist, and in most cases there was also another woman present, whether her mom or a frienin most cases there was also another woman present, whether her mom or a friend.

A federal investigation into corruption in Suffolk County law enforcement has expanded, as the Justice Department examines at least a half - dozen cases to determine whether political considerations influenced decisions made by the local district attorney's office.

Whatever the case, whether full or partial, these government shutdowns are big news (in the US, at least) when they happen.

A federal investigation into corruption in Suffolk County, N.Y., law enforcement has expanded, as the Justice Department examines at least a half - dozen cases to determine whether political considerations influenced decisions made by the Suffolk district attorney's office, according to two people in law enforcement and three who have been questioned by the Justice Department.

The only difference — at least in this case — is whether or not two tons of an illegal narcotic stuffed into every possible opening of a recreational vehicle and a ruthless drug lord (Tomer Sisley) who actually should have the marijuana are involved.

In that case, we should ask ourselves whether we have enough data to start or have at least the correct data.

Whether that's a lot to you for a small SUV depends on your station in life, but at least in this case you're not just paying for a badge --- you're getting one of the most comfortable, competent and entertaining daily drivers on the road today.

And the last time I recall a company saying its liquidity was fine was Bear, and at least at the time of its crunch, Bear's long - term prospects looked better than Ambacs» do (there is still ample debate as to whether Bear was insolvent or not: the answer in most cases depends on one's view of the credit default swaps market).

But when the apparent abuser is CEO of a prominent sports catering company, and the abuse is captured on an elevator surveillance camera, it raises some questions — including, in this case at least, whether he should remain in that position.

Regardless of whether they are owned or not, cats who are outdoors are the leading cause of cat overpopulation in communities and can be a conservation threat to at least some species of wildlife on a case - by - case basis.

Whether his art belongs on equal footing with the Old Masters is up for debate, but at least he's making his case in more interesting ways.

You can identify the main problem areas for your client in the case, and also whether there are any potential gaps in the evidence or at least weaknesses that can be exploited.

Law schools have been heavily criticized for lacking coherent educational missions and for having no means of assessing whether they accomplish what they ostensibly intend to accomplish.82 More particularly, the prevailing «case method» of instruction in law schools, at least standing alone, is criticized as ineffective in training law students to become practicing lawyers.83 Thus, although most law schools say they intend to train students to become practicing lawyers, many fall short of that goal, leaving students to learn various fundamental lawyering skills on the job or elsewhere.

The interesting part is here that the Court established a set of criteria which — at least in my reading — seem to be destined to become benchmarks for future cases to establish in a given situation whether Member States are «implementing» the law of the EU and would thus be bound be EU fundamental rights.

Still, when the difference is over the something as basic as whether the conclusion is both reasonable and logical — implying that (at least for these judges) there's a difference, I'd like to know what they think the difference is in principal, and in the particular case.

Such a case would permit one to determine whether the view Grant advocated in her cert petition tracks her own view, but the issue does not appear to have come before the court again since that time — at least not in a form that has resulted in a written opinion.

In the absence of criminal allegations (in respect of which Mr. Ghomeshi would be presumed innocent until proven otherwise), the question is whether it is appropriate for a private 3rd party (albeit, in this case, a state actor) to take action against Mr. Ghomeshi, particularly if that private party has come to its own conclusion that the activities were not criminal (which, while not determinative of the matter, should at least be binding as between the CBC and Mr. GhomeshiIn the absence of criminal allegations (in respect of which Mr. Ghomeshi would be presumed innocent until proven otherwise), the question is whether it is appropriate for a private 3rd party (albeit, in this case, a state actor) to take action against Mr. Ghomeshi, particularly if that private party has come to its own conclusion that the activities were not criminal (which, while not determinative of the matter, should at least be binding as between the CBC and Mr. Ghomeshiin respect of which Mr. Ghomeshi would be presumed innocent until proven otherwise), the question is whether it is appropriate for a private 3rd party (albeit, in this case, a state actor) to take action against Mr. Ghomeshi, particularly if that private party has come to its own conclusion that the activities were not criminal (which, while not determinative of the matter, should at least be binding as between the CBC and Mr. Ghomeshiin this case, a state actor) to take action against Mr. Ghomeshi, particularly if that private party has come to its own conclusion that the activities were not criminal (which, while not determinative of the matter, should at least be binding as between the CBC and Mr. Ghomeshi).

Not only did it unduly heighten the burden to modify child custody agreements — a decision since rectified in Miles v. Miles, 393 S.C. 111, 711 S.E. 2d 880 (2011)-- but it also granted the family court unfettered discretion in deciding whether to apply Schedule A or Schedule C child support guidelines in setting child support when both parties have the child at least 110 overnights, holding that the family court has the «discretion to utilize any Worksheet [it] finds appropriate under the facts of the case» in an action to modify child support.

It is at least very skeptical of whether the pursuit of injunctive relief is legitimate in cases in which the defendant is clearly entitled to a license on FRAND terms.

The Court of Review is an appellate court, and like other Article III appellate courts, it has the power to bind both lower courts (in this case, the FISC) and later Court of Review panels.22 The Court of Review probably has the same discretion as federal courts of appeals to designate opinions as precedential and non-precedential; at least, no statutory provision declares otherwise.23 The two public Court of Review opinions are published in redacted form in the Federal Reporter.24 As with the published case of the FISC sitting en banc, these published Court of Review cases are certainly precedential.25 We do not know the volume, if any, of secret non-precedential Court of Review opinions, or whether there are non-public Court of Review opinions that are nonetheless treated as precedential.

The old authorities looked to whether the bills were final in respect of an entire case, or at least in respect of an interim period.

Of course, whether the means at issue in a given case are the least restrictive available is a difficult question, and legislatures and courts might disagree about that.

In any case, whether or not Congress manages to pry any more out of Zuckerberg, at least we all get to watch him sweat.

It also gives you battery status in the iOS notifications; on the flip side, the Mophie has a manual switch to control whether the case's power is being used (something Apple doesn't allow you to do) and a four - LED power gage that, though less accurate than Apple's percentage, can at least be checked without your iPhone needing to be in the case and turned on.

Conduct disorder and ODD coexist with ADHD in at least 30 %, and in some reports up to 90 %, of cases.36 These most frequently occurring comorbidities can, however, be considered more as complications of ADHD, with adversity in their psychological environment possibly determining whether children at risk make the transition to antisocial conduct.40