But research on
whether more school choice improves education is mixed.
Not exact matches
Whether it's providing
more choices with less sugar in stores or removing full - calorie soft drinks from
schools, we're always looking for different ways to support your efforts to make every day a balanced one.
And as I sat through this district's presentation,
school food professionals in the audience were eagerly asking for
more details about all of it: the cost of the coffee cups,
whether the lid and cardboard sleeve were included in the price, which extra-brightly-colored Trix were used in the treats shown above (apparently Trix Swirls is the
more eye - catching
choice).
About 80 % of
schools with
more than one class in a year group give parents of twins a
choice of
whether to separate their twins or keep them together.
Whether you're thinking about a career change or going back to
school for
more advanced education, your resources are precious, and we here at the Institute for the Psychology of Eating want you to feel confident that you're making the right
choice.
The researchers also compared sugary ready - to - eat cereal to oatmeal and found oatmeal's nutritional advantage (
more nourishing whole food meal) made it a better
choice at improving brain power and encouraging better test scores.1 Additional stats show higher test grades and better
school attendance in breakfast eaters than in non-breakfast eaters too.2 Bottom line: to excel in whatever we do,
whether it be
school, work, play or relationships, we need breakfast to be at the top of our mental game.
Reality: While it's true that younger students,
whether they be elementary
school students or freshmen at your high
school, need a
more fundamental set of skills for both academics and behavior, students of all ages can work to know themselves better, relate better to others, and make responsible
choices.
The coming debate will be over
whether the solution is to create a
more sweeping form of public
school choice or to revive private
school vouchers to create the alternative the public system has so far squelched.
Remember that my test for
whether school choice raises demand for certain teacher characteristics is two-fold: 1)
whether a
school that faces stronger competition hires teachers with
more of a certain characteristic; and 2)
whether that characteristic earns a premium in an environment of greater
school choice.
Again, however, our data do not tell us
whether the charter presence has caused opinion to change or
whether charters have simply located in areas that are
more hospitable to
school choice.
As the evidence on
school choice continues to grow, it is tempting to compare the results achieved by
school voucher programs to those of charter
schools — to ask
whether one option or the other represents a
more promising avenue for expanding educational opportunity.
Whether your sights are set on
more rigorous academic standards, foolproof reading instruction, greater teacher effectiveness, expanded
school choice, overhauled governance, or almost anything else that would benefit from big - time change, the challenge is huge.
Whether it is for stronger academics, safer learning environments, empowered teachers or
more personalized curriculum, Americans are seeking
school choice.
Ryan is
more positive about the varieties of
school choice —
whether within
school districts, or by way of charter
schools and vouchers, and of course he favors interdistrict
choice — but the legislative and judicial obstacles (not to mention practical ones) to the expansion of this route are clear.
Their enthusiasm for
school choice suggests that they are
more confident of parents» ability to sense
whether a
school or teacher is effective and to act on that knowledge.
The piece was intended to demonstrate that 1) good outcomes are associated with good
choices made by families and thus 2) we can not conclude that
schools and neighborhoods do not matter because such conclusions are invalidated by selection; that 3) we can not tell
whether «bad» families are inefficacious because they only have bad
choices open to them or because they would make bad
choices even if offered good ones; and 4) we ought to be far
more open to any policy that makes better
choices available to families who now have little or no
choice open to them.
Taken together this picture of the
choice process requires us to consider
whether improvements in the traditional modes of providing information to parents (e.g. printed
choice guides, websites) alone can substantively lead to
more informed parents and by extension, expansion of parents»
choice sets that include
more diverse
schools.
The current local controversy over
whether the
school board should approve two
more charter
schools is not about believing in
school choice, it's about survival.
Two issues dominate the
school choice debate:
whether competition would make
schools more productive, and
whether choice would result in sorting or stratification.
The proposed expansion of
school choice in Wisconsin comes at a time when President Barack Obama and Republicans are promoting charter
schools and teacher accountability, while skeptics question
whether choice programs have proven to be any
more effective than traditional public
schools.
The question is
whether we should add
more money to
schools prior to demanding
choice and accountability.
Still, it remains to be seen
whether or not the
school choice movement will have significant impact on the awareness of families for choosing
more philosophically diverse
schools.
Liberal courts are disposed to discover something in state constitutions that will disqualify the law, regardless of
whether the constitution prohibits vouchers according to a strict constructionist reading, but conservative courts that may be friendlier to
school choice also will adhere
more closely to a strict reading of the letter and intent of the constitution.
Part of the purpose of making this data available was to help parents see how the students in their children's
school were faring and make
more informed
choices,
whether it's pressuring the
school and district to do better, or taking their children elsewhere.
If parents who make
school choices for thir own kids, but stand in the way of other parents choosing a
school that best fits their needs,
whether magnet, charter or anything else, they should feel far
more than a little hypocritical.
Going from country to country, it is clear that
more competition —
whether through public or private
school choice measures — leads to higher test scores for public and private
schools alike.
We can debate the point
whether or not charters are public
schools, but I think the
more important question is
whether charters are providing viable
school choices that families want.
More generally, at the heart of
school choice,
whether in the form of vouchers or charter
schools, is a «belief in the power of deregulation» (Ravitch, 2010a, p. 127).
During his speech, Harker also said that educating high
school students about options (
whether it's a scholarship, private loan, federal grant or student loan) and consequences can also enable them to make better,
more successful
choices.
Whether for new high
school graduates entering the job market for the first time or for older individuals seeking to transition to a
more rewarding field, becoming a veterinary assistant can be an excellent
choice.