R (Wylde) v Waverley BC [2017] EWHC 466 (Admin) Leading case on
whether objectors to development can have standing to rely upon the Public Contracts Regulations.
Local boards and courts are to decide
whether the objector's beliefs are sincerely held and whether they are, in his own scheme of things, religious; they are not to require proof of the religious doctrines, nor are they to reject beliefs because they are not comprehensible.
Not exact matches
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, and will decide
whether businesses run by religious
objectors to gay marriage may refuse to cater a gay wedding.
A powerhouse cast is featured in a dramatic film about the legal battle over
whether to find in favor of the boxing champ in his appeal for conscientious
objector status in the military draft.
(school closure, right of
objectors to appear before SOC, scope of SOC's duty to hear objections orally, natural justice, locus /
whether pupils can be the applicants; abuse of process;)
Maybe it's bad for federal law to impose such an obligation on employers,
whether because the law is too vague, imposes unduly on private employers, imposes unduly on coworkers, gives an undue preference to conscientious
objectors (it has been interpreted to apply to nonreligious conscientious
objectors as well as religious ones), or something else.