Sentences with phrase «whether orders of this court»

«But there's something very important going on... and that is whether orders of this court can be disobeyed with impunity.

Not exact matches

Still, experts said those comments were likely to hurt the government's case in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which heard arguments on Tuesday night over whether the TRO should be upheld while the order's legality is established.

If Trump's past comments about a ban on Muslims don't weigh heavily on the judges» perceptions of his motivations, the speed with which the order was drafted and rolled out — largely bypassing the government's traditional national - security apparatus — and the extent to which it has been altered since may give courts reason enough to wonder whether an «ulterior motive» was at play, Stock said.

US prosecutors have asked the court to «make a strenuous inquiry into whether the defendant is financially unable to afford counsel» in order to prevent taxpayers from «needlessly» paying for the defense of man reputed to be worth billions.

A preliminary injunction against Zillow and one of its chief execs, Errol Samuelson, is set to lift on March 22, but a Washington state Superior Court judge has ordered an investigation into whether Zillow and Samuelson should be held in contempt for violating the injunction.

The court considered there was a real issue as to whether or not there are presently any validly appointed directors of YAC and ordered the issue be determined as soon as possible at a trial to be held on 22 February in the Supreme Ccourt considered there was a real issue as to whether or not there are presently any validly appointed directors of YAC and ordered the issue be determined as soon as possible at a trial to be held on 22 February in the Supreme CourtCourt.

Stevens offered not a word of concern about whether religious students might feel themselves to be less than full members of the political community if, by order of the nation's highest court, their messages and only their messages are categorically excluded from the school's public arena.

Were a person to have violated a court order directing the return of a runaway slave when Dred Scott was the law, would a genuinely held belief that a slave was a human person and not an article of property be a matter the Court could not consider in deciding whether that person was guilty of a criminal contempt chcourt order directing the return of a runaway slave when Dred Scott was the law, would a genuinely held belief that a slave was a human person and not an article of property be a matter the Court could not consider in deciding whether that person was guilty of a criminal contempt chCourt could not consider in deciding whether that person was guilty of a criminal contempt charge?

An affidavit was filed a week ago by the A-G asking the Apex Court to order the defendant (Mr. Woyome) to appear before it on Thursday, November 10, at 9:00 am, «to be examined orally on oath by the 1st Defendant (Attorney - General) whether Mr. Woyome has any property or other means of satisfying the judgement debt».

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».

He also want an order of the court, directing the respondents, whether by themselves, their servants, agents, privies or otherwise howsoever to forthwith release the application from unlawful custody.

Dissatisfied with the conduct of the police, the group went to court to seek clarification on whether or not it was appropriate for a Circuit Court to entertain matters arising out of the enforcement of the Public Ordercourt to seek clarification on whether or not it was appropriate for a Circuit Court to entertain matters arising out of the enforcement of the Public OrderCourt to entertain matters arising out of the enforcement of the Public Order Act.

Evan Davis, head of the Committee for a Constitutional Convention, files suit against the New York State Board of Elections to obtain a court order requiring the question whether to call a state constitutional convention to be placed on the front rather on the back of the ballot this November.

The suit also asks the court to «pierce the corporate veil» to reveal the identities of those behind the LLCs in order to determine whether the companies exist for a legitimate business purpose, or if they are «corporate alter - egos» meant to circumvent the limits.

A copy of the suit said: «This honourable court will be moved by Gary Nimako Marfo ESQ., counsel for and on behalf of plaintiff / applicants herein praying for an order of interlocutory injunction to restrain defendants / respondents, whether by themselves, agents, servants, workmen, hirelings, privies or any person claiming under or through them or howsoever described, from holding out the second defendant / respondent, [as] the parliamentary candidate - elect for Klottey Korle constituency.»

«The issue before the trial court was whether the 1st respondent (PDP) can rubbish the judgment / order of the court for whatever reason and set up a caretaker committee, other claims notwithstanding.

A copy of the suit, which is available to ClassFMonline.com said: «This honourable court will be moved by Gary Nimako Marfo ESQ., counsel for and on behalf of plaintiff / applicants herein praying for an order of interlocutory injunction to restrain defendants / respondents, whether by themselves, agents, servants, workmen, hirelings, privies or any person claiming under or through them or howsoever described, from holding out the second defendant / respondent, [as] the parliamentary candidate - elect for Klottey Korle constituency.»

«Furthermore, we demand an explanation from the DSS whether in a democracy, it is part of the its mandate to disobey court orders anddump Nigerians in detention for 18 days on unfounded allegations.

Hon. Kola Oluwawole, Deputy Speaker; Hon Segun Adewumi and 16 others, said the DSS must explain to Nigerians whether in a democracy, it was part of the its mandate to disobey court orders and dump Nigerians in detention for 18 days on unfounded allegations.

The court presided over by Justice Eric Kyei Baffour ordered the commission to give the PPP the chance to correct the anomalies on the nomination forms of its Flagbearer, and subsequently decide on whether to allow him into the race or not.

On September 17, a hearing was held in San Francisco Superior Court in Field v Bowen, over whether Judge Curtis Karnow's order of August 1 could be reconsidered.

The three - judge appeals court panel said in its order Thursday that the Supreme Court should rule on whether voiding the law is the proper remedy for an open meetings law violation and whether a court has the authority to stop the secretary of state from publishincourt panel said in its order Thursday that the Supreme Court should rule on whether voiding the law is the proper remedy for an open meetings law violation and whether a court has the authority to stop the secretary of state from publishinCourt should rule on whether voiding the law is the proper remedy for an open meetings law violation and whether a court has the authority to stop the secretary of state from publishincourt has the authority to stop the secretary of state from publishing it.

Drawing on Standing order 93 (1), Dr. Ayine invited the Speaker of Parliament to rule on whether the House's intention to approve the nominee will not be wrong pending the Supreme Court case.

He was however quick to add that, the court's order «will open the question as to whether or not some of the issues being complained about by the EC are errors that can be corrected or issues that border on criminality as the EC has pointed out in relation to Papa Kwesi Nduom.»

In the alternative, he prayed the court to give an order of interim injunction mandating the defendants, whether by themselves, their servants, agents, privies or howsoever called to publish the name of the plaintiff as an aspirant for the November 19, 2011 governorship primary in Bayelsa State or any governorship primary election scheduled for Bayelsa State, on any date which the defendants may choose, pending the determination of the substantive suit.

A U.S. District Court judge is considering whether to order reforms to stop and frisk after a 10 - week bench trial in which a dozen people testified that they were stopped by police solely because of their race.

John Whittingdale has apparently not decided whether or not to issue a «commencement order», which is a formality within the provision of the Crime and Courts Act.

The court presided over by Justice Eric Kyei Baffour, subsequently ordered the Commission to give the PPP the chance to correct the anomalies on the nomination forms of its Flagbearer, and subsequently decide whether to accept him inn the race or not.

U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken in Oakland, Calif., on April 29 ordered the Bush administration to stop dragging its feet on the fate of polar bears and decide by May 15 whether declining sea ice in the Arctic threatens their existence.

The court stopped short of determining whether or not the FWS should have completed an EIS because it said the errors in the service's assessment made it unclear whether or not the orders would have a significant effect on the environment.

A panel of judges from the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to rule this week on whether a temporary halt placed on the order by a federal district judge should be kept in place.

When the Times is slapped with a temporary court order preventing further disclosures, it's up to Graham and the Post, which has gotten a batch of the papers, too, to decide whether to support the Times and publish its own information.

Then they faced the question of whether to publish — risking legal sanction, financial disaster, and possibly even prison — or to wait until the Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of Nixon's court oCourt ruled on the constitutionality of Nixon's court ocourt order.

Amid the recent economic turmoil and gaping state budget shortfalls, questions of whether court - ordered funding remedies have delivered — and why they have or have not — have taken on particular import.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant had ordered L.A. Unified to show that it was using test scores in evaluations by Tuesday after ruling earlier this year that state law required such data as evidence of whether teachers have helped their students progress academically.

Little is known about whether court mandates ultimately affect the distribution of taxes and spending or whether the legislature offsets the distributional consequences of those court orders with

To the extent permitted by law, we shall not be liable for any Losses by or with respect to the Account, except to the extent that such Losses are actual Losses proven with reasonable certainty, are not speculative, are proven to have been fairly within the contemplation of the parties as of the date hereof, and are determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or an arbitration panel in a final non-appealable judgment or order to have resulted solely from our gross negligence or willful misconduct and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we will not be liable for any indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages or other losses (regardless of whether such damages or other losses were reasonably foreseeable).

The judge will determine, based on the evidence, whether you are court ordered to forfeit your rights of ownership or place a bond.

Whether you're working with a family that was court ordered to complete dog training or a family that's on its last leg with a dog that's bitten multiple relatives, there are some precautions you need to take and be aware of the liabilities you're taking on.

Yesterday the Court further denied a government request for an additional 3 to 4 years of delay, instead ordering the DOE to revise the long - overdue petroleum reduction goal to an achievable number within one year, and in the following year to determine whether the AFV purchase rules must apply to private and municipal vehicle fleets, potentially requiring the purchase of tens of thousands of additional AFVs.

A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision is pending on whether to uphold U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Vince Chhabria's order sending those suits back to state court from federal cCourt of Appeals decision is pending on whether to uphold U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Vince Chhabria's order sending those suits back to state court from federal cCourt for the Northern District of California Judge Vince Chhabria's order sending those suits back to state court from federal ccourt from federal courtcourt.

Courts can not only order prosecutors to consider a case, but they can also find an «abuse of prosecutorial discretion» and then decide themselves whether the state has to prosecute a case, enforce a law, etc..

They stated a case for consideration of the High Court in relation to s 33 «where the only issue in dispute is whether payments of child support maintenance in question have not been paid, are the magistrates obliged to make [the] order if they are satisfied that payment was made but by a method other than that notified by the Child Support Agency»?

The court has a discretion as to whether repayment should be made by a losing payee spouse; and thus for example «to order repayment unconditionally or subject to a prohibition against enforcement against her without further leave»; but such discretion «should certainly not be equated with that of determining the incidence of costs at the conclusion of an appeal».

The exercise that the court conducts is not one of enforcing the agreement but of determining whether an order should be made in the same terms of the agreement.

In these circumstances the Court decided to refer the following questions for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU: 1) whether for the purposes of Art. 2 (2)(c), Member States can require the direct descendant who is older than 21 years to have tried, without success, to obtain employment in the country of origin in order to be regarded as «dependant» and fall within the scope of the provision; and 2) whether in interpreting the term «dependant» any significance should be attached to the fact that the family member is, due to the personal circumstances such as age, education and health, deemed to obtain employment in the host Member State, which would mean that the conditions of dependence will no longer be met.

They say the theory that parties choose their arbitral seat on the basis of whether the court of that jurisdiction is able to issue an anti-suit injunction is unproven and that such orders are no longer as popular as they once were in any event.

Finally, beyond the United Kingdom's withdrawal, the post will move on to consider whether the idea of a joint national and European court could provide a solution to the problems that arise from the unique composite nature of the EU legal order.

Although the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) long ago characterised the deliberate refusal of a Member State to implement EU law as a «failure in the duty of solidarity» that «strikes at the fundamental basis» of the EU legal order (Case 39/72, para. 25), it has not been clear whether the principle of solidarity among Member States can be enforced in European courts.

Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25 says that the «duty» of the court in deciding whether to make an order is to have regard to «all the circumstances of the case» (emphasis added); and, in particular, to a variety of present and future — when the application bites — factors.