Sentences with phrase «whether paying for reviews»

But maybe we should set aside whether paying for reviews is ever acceptable (many well respected sources such as Kirkus charge for their reviews although admittedly they don't promise a positive one).

Not exact matches

While legal, it's presumably not great for Yelp's reputation if the public thinks the company is tinkering with its review - filtering algorithm based on whether or not a company pays for advertising.

Absent an annual review, it's tough to determine whether you're paying too much, paying for coverage you no longer need or are underinsured — which exposes your family to risk.

A critical planning strategy for many businesses and individuals is to periodically review whether you could be paying too much in property taxes.

The laws, which are now being reviewed under a public comment period, will likely spark a legal battle over who would pay for burials and whether or not such rules should even be on the books.

«Given the savings that the department must make over the next few years, we recommend that it review its practice on bonuses and consider whether, within government guidelines, increasing performance - related bonuses for those at the lower end of salary scales, with a consequent reduction for its higher - paid senior staff, might help to improve staff morale,» the report stated.

The senior salaries review body (SSRB) is conducting a widespread review of MPs» pay next year, looking at annual salaries and issues such as whether members should be rewarded for longevity of service.

If you are still deciding whether to get a free or paid membership in your preferred dating site, you can go online and check on reviews from paying members to help you decide which option would be best for you.

Whether you're looking for a lover, a friend or simply a At we review the best free and paid dating websites with exclusive offers as well as blog stories and feedback from our readers in Australia.

Our titular characters try to earn a billion dollars to pay back the money they wasted on a big movie, and myself and Germain Lussier from SlashFilm recorded a video blog reviewing the film and letting people know whether it's just for the fans.

St. Clair, who calls Florence «Bunny», has a full - time job trying to hide all the negativity from her, whether it's paying for good reviews or preventing hecklers from attending her concerts.

He noted that the DOJ did not get everything it wanted in the ruling — namely, the right to review student demographic information for a full 45 days before the state could let families know whether they'd been awarded vouchers to help them pay private - school tuition.

CBST will review your child's file and decide whether the city will pay for a private school placement.

I disagree with Kozlowski I review books both from Publishers and Indies — and I think he has sour grapes, I do not distinguish between whether the author has paid it all themselves — or whether they have gone the traditional route and been fortunate to be picked up — YES Indie Publishing means that the Author gets the profits faster — BUT THEY HAVE PAID for Editors, Covers etc and had to market the book themselves out their own pocpaid it all themselves — or whether they have gone the traditional route and been fortunate to be picked up — YES Indie Publishing means that the Author gets the profits faster — BUT THEY HAVE PAID for Editors, Covers etc and had to market the book themselves out their own pocPAID for Editors, Covers etc and had to market the book themselves out their own pocket!

«Paid Reviews — We do not permit reviews or votes on the helpfulness of reviews that are posted in exchange for compensation of any kind, including payment (whether in the form of money or gift certificates), bonus content, entry to a contest or sweepstakes, discounts on future purchases, extra product, or otherReviews — We do not permit reviews or votes on the helpfulness of reviews that are posted in exchange for compensation of any kind, including payment (whether in the form of money or gift certificates), bonus content, entry to a contest or sweepstakes, discounts on future purchases, extra product, or otherreviews or votes on the helpfulness of reviews that are posted in exchange for compensation of any kind, including payment (whether in the form of money or gift certificates), bonus content, entry to a contest or sweepstakes, discounts on future purchases, extra product, or otherreviews that are posted in exchange for compensation of any kind, including payment (whether in the form of money or gift certificates), bonus content, entry to a contest or sweepstakes, discounts on future purchases, extra product, or other gifts.

Regardless of all this, whether to pay for any sort of book review is the writer's choice.

The best essay writing service reviews will talk about the level of customer service, the quality of the paper the person received, the ability of the writer to deliver on all of the requirements, whether or not the company followed through on their guarantees and the actual price they paid for the service they received.

And whether you love or hate a book, post a review and include a disclaimer that you haven't been paid for doing so.

When a Fiverr reviewer says, «Just tell me what you want the review to say,» it's not honest, whether the person paying for it is an individual or a big publishing company.

I suggest your default position is to let the reader of the review decide for him or herself whether or not to pay attention to the review.

I answered «yes» to all of the questions on debating whether or not to pay for a Kirkus indie review.

They will be able to check easily whether the author paid for a review.

Not yet having read the NYT piece, I'll say this: Posting a paid review without disclosing that it was paid for is considered deceitful and unethical according to the US federal government (whether the tenor of the review was guaranteed or not).

The point is not whether the review was paid for or not, it is whether it is objective and truthful.

You'll give us as much information possible about your book, choose whether you want standard service (7 - 9 weeks) or express service (4 - 6 weeks) and pay for your review (standard service $ 425, express service $ 575).»

Professional reviews for all published books — whether trad or indie — are, directly or indirectly, paid for.

What the expose didn't cover was whether or not all of the reviews written by paid reviewers were paid for.

If you review the list of benefits for a card you're considering and determine that there is significant potential value, try the card for a year then evaluate whether you actually received enough value to justify paying the renewal annual fee and keeping the card.

A counselor can review your financial situation, help you with budgeting and see whether you're a candidate for a debt management plan, which would allow you to pay off your credit card debt over time, perhaps at a lower interest rate.

While you're reviewing your possessions, think about whether you want to insure them for actual cash value (where the policy would pay less money for older items than you paid for them new) or for replacement cost (which would cover to replace the items).

A credit card checkup includes reviewing annual fees — Before paying your credit card's annual fee for another year, look at whether you're getting your money's worth and consider other card options.

I'm opening this review with all of this because your decision on whether or not to buy Battlegrounds should depend heavily on whether or not the chance to unlock bonus items is important to you, and how much you're willing to pay for that chance.

At the point where I would ordinarily reach out to the people who'd given me a review copy, and politely enquire as to whether these performance issues were going to be fixed, instead I wrote about the game somewhat incensed, having just paid for something that didn't work as intended.

The judicial review proceedings were concluded by consent in June 2016 leaving the only issue for determination by the court of whether costs should be paid by the Scottish authorities on the «standard» or «indemnity» basis.

These include: United States v. Resendiz - Ponce, which presents the question whether the omission of an element from a federal indictment can constitute harmless error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a long distance carrier for alleged violations of the Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture on them.

The lawyer also asked whether any of her medical bills had been paid through a group health insurance policy, if she had reviewed that policy to determine whether one insurer might have to compensate another, and if any agreement was made by the tow truck's insurer with medical providers for paying off the medical bills.

It is meant to expose marketing practices that exploit viral media by paying for favorable reviews — whether the payment is in cash or goods.

Whether Legal Aid ends up paying those costs or not, it needs to review its own internal workings to make sure it never again supports for so long what the judge rightly called a «meritless» case.

You have to balance the cost of the vendor for TAR versus how much it is going to cost if you use keywords and manual review — or even worse manual review with no keyword screening and are paying whether its contract attorneys or associates at the firm x hundred dollars per hour to review documents.

In addition to that, you will also want to review the insurance carrier that you're considering buying the policy through in order to determine whether or not it is strong and stable financially, and that it also has a good, positive reputation, for paying out its policyholder claims.

It is also recommended that you review the insurance company you're considering buying the policy through to determine whether it is strong and stable financially and that it has a good, positive reputation for paying out its claims.

Key Consumer Tip: Many factors determine what you'll pay for homeowners insurance, so whether you're buying or building a new home or just reviewing the cost and coverage under your current homeowners insurance policy, be aware of what affects your bottom line.

While your GMI plan for worldwide coverage will not be affected by PPACA, you should review the information below to see if you are exempt from the requirements of PPACA or not, and whether you will have to pay a tax penalty or not.

In addition, it is important to review the insurance carrier that you're considering buying your coverage through to determine whether or not it is strong and stable financially, and that it has a positive reputation for quickly paying out its policy holder's claims.

While your Reside ® plan for worldwide coverage will not be affected by PPACA, you should review the information below to see if you are exempt from the requirements of PPACA or not, and whether you will have to pay a tax penalty or not.

The New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission (MVC) reviews your driving history every year to assess whether or not you need to pay surcharges for excess points.

It is also essential that you review the insurance carrier that you are considering buying your policy through to determine whether it is reliable and stable financially and that it has a good reputation for paying out its policy holders» claims.

It is also important that you review the insurance company you are considering buying your policy through to determine whether it is financially stable, and that it has a positive reputation for paying out its policy holder claims.

Also, it is also important that you review the insurance carrier that you are thinking about buying the policy though to determine whether or not it is strong and stable financially, that that it has a good, positive reputation for paying out its claims promptly.