Not exact matches
U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken in Oakland, Calif., on April 29 ordered the Bush administration to stop dragging its feet on the fate of
polar bears and decide by May 15
whether declining
sea ice in the Arctic threatens their existence.
For example, few data are available for the
polar winter, and it is not known
whether aragonite - undersaturated areas decrease in size with the seasonal freezing of
sea ice.
Determining
whether polar ice sheets are shrinking or growing, and what their contribution to changes in
sea level is, has motivated
polar scientists for decades.
Second, the debates among climatologists nowadays are not over
whether there is human - exacerbated climate change — melting
polar ice, rise in
sea level, more tropical storms, etc. — but over how large the effects are (one or four degrees), and what the specific consequences for each spot on the globe will be.
They used all the scientific papers they could find that investigated both
polar bears and
sea ice, which added up to 92, and scored their positions on
sea ice extent and
whether it is decreasing significantly and the threat of extinction versus adaptability of
polar bears.
I'm not sure
whether this is off topic, but I have read in other threads that there is less cold water plunging to the ocean floor around Antarctica (and presumably the Arctic too) due to the
sea water becoming less saline due to increased precipitation and melting
polar ice.
The paper questioned
whether climate change was dangerous for
polar bears and
whether the region was warming at all, even as NASA reported that the 2007 minimum
sea ice levels were at an all - time low, falling to nearly 40 percent below the 1979 - 2000 average.